Validation of the Korean version of the thriving at work scale An evaluation of discriminant validity

Main Article Content

MyoungSo Kim
JungKoum Choi

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to validate the Thriving at Work Scale(TWS) developed by Porath and colleagues(2012) in Korea. Specifically, the study was attempted to (1) examine the factor structure and items of the TWS to develop the Korean version of the TWS(TWS-K), and (2) investigate the discriminant validity of the TWS-K with the 5 similar concepts proposed only conceptually in the literature(job engagement, flow, resilience, flourishing, psychological well-being) as well as the incremental validity of the TWS-K over job engagement on performance. Two surveys were conducted for this purpose, and a total of 850 employees working at different fields in Korea participated in off-line or on-line survey. In Study 1, we conducted both exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses using the off-line data of 205 participants. The results showed that the factor structure of vitality and learning composed of positive 10 items in the TWS-K had a better fit compared to the original positive 8 and negative 2 items included in the TWS. It was also found that the reliability of the TWS-K was much higher than that of the TWS among Koreans. In Study 2, the results of a confirmatory factor analysis on 645 on-line participants demonstrated the six-factor model which assumed the independence of 6 related factors had the best fit among 6 models, supporting the discriminant validity of the TWS-K. Support was also found for the criterion-related validity of the TWS-K on the various criteria of performance. In addition, the results of hierarchical multiple regression analyses confirmed that thriving at work is a distinct construct, as the incremental variances of thriving at work on task, contextual, and adaptive performance were significant when each of similar concepts such as jog engagement controlled. Finally the implications and future research directions were discussed based on the findings.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
KimM., & ChoiJ. (2018). Validation of the Korean version of the thriving at work scale: An evaluation of discriminant validity. Korean Journal of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 31(3), 715-739. Retrieved from https://journal.ksiop.or.kr/index.php/KJIOP/article/view/50
Section
Empirical Articles

References

구재선, 김의철 (2006). 심리적 특성, 생활 경험, 행복의 통합적 관계. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 20(4), 1-18.

구재선, 서은국 (2011). 한국인, 누가 언제 행복한가? 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 25(2), 143-166.

구재선, 서은국 (2013). 행복이 미래 수입과 직업수행에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 27(2), 17-36.

구재선, 이아롱, 서은국 (2009). 행복의 사회적 기능: 행복한 사람이 인기가 있나? 한국심리학회지: 사회문제, 15(1), 29-47.

김나형 (2010). 상사-부하 관계(LMX)의 질과 부하 직원의 경력만족, 업무성과, 업무관련 정서적 웰빙(JAWS)에 대한 연구: 멘토링의 조절효과를 중심으로. 고려대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.

김용호 (2012). 직무관여와 조직몰입의 관계: 상사-부하 교환관계(LMX)의 질, 조직지원인식의 조절효과. 아주대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.

김정운, 박정열 (2008). 일과 삶의 균형 (Work-Life Balance) 척도 개발을 위한 연구. 여가학연구, 5(3). 53-69.

김주엽 (2006). 일과 가정의 균형에 관한 문헌적 검토. 인적자원개발연구, 8(1). 83-117.

김주엽 (2009). 행복: 조직행동의 새로운 지평. 인적자원개발연구, 12(1), 123-141.

김주엽, 박종찬, 김찬중 (2009). 일과 생활의 균형, 만족 및 이직의도의 관계. 인사관리연구, 33(4), 121-153.

남정민 (2012). 고몰입 인적자원관리가 구성원의 태도에 미치는 영향에 대한 다수준분석: 심리적 임파워먼트 및 조직신뢰의 매개효과 및 업종의 조절효과. 중앙대학교 대학원 박사학위논문.

모화숙, 박미라, 하대현 (2013). Big 성격요인과 주관적 안녕감간의 관계에 대한 자기효능감의 매개효과. 교육심리연구, 27(3), 761- 781.

박경환 (2012). 기혼 여성관리자의 일-가정 관계가 관리능력, 직무만족, 조직몰입, 그리고 삶의 만족에 미치는 영향. 대한경영학회지, 25(2), 879-905.

박종찬 (2009). 성격유형, 일-생활 균형, 그리고 이직의도와의 관계. 충북대학교 대학원 박사학위논문.

서은국 (2011). 단축형 행복 척도(COMOSWB) 개발 및 타당화. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 25(1), 95-113.

우정원, 홍혜영 (2011). 가족 친화적 조직분위기, 직장-가정갈등과 심리적 안녕감이 조직몰입에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 30(4), 933-957.

유경량 (2007). 유아교육기관에서 팔로워십이 Leader-Member Exchange(LMX)와 임파워먼트와의 관계에 미치는 영향. 건국대학교 대학원 박사학위논문.

유정희 (2010). 방송인의 감정노동과 직무스트레스가 심리적 안녕감과 소진에 미치는 영향. 경성대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.

이경민, 최윤정 (2009). 유아교사의 행복, 강점, 직무만족의 관련성 탐색 연구. 유아교육연구, 29(3), 215-235.

이기은, 전무경 (2011). 사회적 지원과 교환관계의 질이 조직 내 구성원의 혁신행동에 미치는 영향. 대한경영학회지, 24(2), 943- 961.

이숙정, 오재림 (2010). 여성친화적 조직문화, 조직유효성, 직장 및 가정생활 갈등과 주관적 안녕감 간의 관계. 아시아여성연구, 49(1), 7-39.

이윤경 (2009). 일과 생활의 균형(Work-Life Balance)이 조직유효성에 미치는 영향. 부산대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.

이재신, 이지혜 (2011). 교사의 자율성, 낙관성, 교수몰입과 주관적 안녕감 간의 관계. 한국교원교육연구, 28(1), 65-90.

이종찬, 장경혜 (2003). 상사-부하간 교환관계가 직무만족과 조직몰입에 미치는 영향: 대학 비서직 근무자를 대상으로. 인적자원개발연구, 5(1), 55-74.

이종찬 (2012). 조직지원인식과 상사-부하 간 교환관계가 구성원의 태도와 행위에 미치는 영향. 대한경영학회지, 25(3), 1361- 1377.

이지혜 (2010). 교사의 심리적 소진과 주관적 안녕감과의 관계: 조직몰입의 매개효과. 한국교원교육연구, 27(3), 143-164.

임주희 (2010). LMX(리더-구성원 교환관계)와 TMX(팀-구성원 교환관계)가 직장-가정 갈등에 미치는 영향: 자기결정감의 매개효과와 고용안정성의 조절효과 검증. 고려대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.

장재윤, 김혜숙 (2003). 직장-가정 간 갈등이 삶의 만족 및 직무태도에 미치는 효과에 있어서의 성차: 우리나라 관리직 공무원들을 대상으로. 한국심리학회지: 사회문제, 9(1), 23-42.

조범상 (2005). 좌뇌형 기업, 우뇌형 기업. LG주간경제, 814, 26-30. http://www.lgeri.com/ uploadFiles/ko/pdf/man/consul814_4_20050107135012.pdf에서 2013, 1, 12 인출.

주재성 (2006). 상사와 부하간 관계의 질(Leader-Member Exchange)을 통한 조직 성과 연구: 벤처기업을 중심으로. 연세대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.

지혜정 (2010). WLB(Work-Life Balance)수준에 따른 직무만족과 이직의도의 차이 검증. 충북대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.

차동옥, 김정식, 곽신근, 신유순 (2010). 리더-부하간 교환관계(LMX)가 정서적 몰입과 근속적 몰입에 미치는 영향: 직무스트레스의 매개효과를 중심으로. 한국콘텐츠학회논문지, 10(1), 364-363.

천혜정, 한나 (2009). 근로자의 일 지향성, 일 스트레스 및 조직문화가 일과 삶의 조화에 미치는 영향. 한국가족자원경영학회지, 13(4). 53-72.

Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of occupational psychology, 63(1), 1-18.

Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1996). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: An examination of construct validity. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 49(3), 252-276.

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, Strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.

Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-600.

Beutell, N, J., & Greenhaus, J. H. (1982). Interrole conflict among married women: The influence of husband and wife characteristics on conflict and coping behavior. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 21(1), 99-110.

Boehm, J. K., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2008). Does happiness promote career success?. Journal of Career Assessment, 16(1), 101-116.

Buchanan, B. (1974). Building organizational commitment: The socialization of managers in work organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 19(4), 533-546.

Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rodgers, W. L. (1976). The quality of American life. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Cropanzano, R., & Wright, T. A. (1999). A 5-year study of change in the relationship between well-being and job performance. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 51(4), 252-265.

Cropanzano, R., & Wright, T. A. (2001). When a ‘happy’ worker is really a ‘productive’ Worker: A review and further refinement of the happy- productive worker thesis. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 53(3) 182-199.

Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Wong, M. M. (1991). The situational and personal correlates of happiness: A crossnational comparison. Subjective Well- being: An Interdisciplinary Perspective, 21, 193- 212.

Diener, E., Sandvik, E., & Pavot, W. (1991). Happiness is the frequency, not the intensity, of positive versus negative affect. In F. Strack, M. Argyle, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Subjective Well-being: An Interdisciplinary Perspective (pp. 119-139). New York: Pergamon.

Epitropaki, O., & Martin R. (1999). The impact of relational demography on the quality of leader-member exchanges and employees' work attitudes and well-being. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72(2), 237-240.

Frederick, S., & Lowenstein, G. (1999). Hedonic adaptation. In D. Kahneman, D. Diener, & N. Schwarz(Eds.), Well-being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology (pp.302-329). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology. American Psychology, 56(3), 218-226.

Frone, M. R. (2003). Work-family balance. In J. C. Quick & L. E. Tetric (Eds.). Handbook of occupational health psychology (pp.143-162). Washington: American Psychological Association.

George, J. M. (1991). State or trait: Effects of positive mood on prosocial behaviors at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(2), 299-307.

Graen, G., Novak, M. A., & Sommerkamp, P. (1982). The effects of leader- member exchange and job design on productivity and satisfaction: Testing a dual attachment model. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 30(1), 109-131.

Graen, G. B., & Scandura, T. A. (1987). Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing.Research in Organizational Behavior, 9, 175-208.

Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bein, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219-247.

Grawitch, M. J., Munz, D. C., & Kramer, T. J. (2003). Effects of member mood states on creative performance in temporary workgroups. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 7(1), 41.

Greenhaus, J. H., & Beutell, N. J. (1985). Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of Management Review, 10(1), 76-88.

Greenhaus, J. H., Collins, K. M., & Shaw, J. D. (2003). The relation between work-family balance and quality of life. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63(3), 510-531.

Greenhaus, J. H., & Powell, G. N. (2006). When work and family are allies: A theory of work-family enrichment. Academy of Management Review, 31(1), 72-92.

Gröpel, P., & Kuhl, J. (2009). Work-life balance and subjective well‐being: The mediating role of need fulfillment. British Journal of Psychology, 100(2), 365-375.

Harker, L., & Keltner, D. (2001). Expressions of positive emotion in women's college yearbook pictures and their relationship to personality and life outcomes across adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(1), 112-124.

Headey, B., & Wearing. A. (1989). Personality, life events and subjective well-being: Toward a dynamic equilibrium model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(4), 731-739.

Iaffaldano, M. T., & Muchinsky, P. M. (1985). Job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 97(2), 251- 273.

Iverson, R. D., Olekalns, M., & Erwin, P. J. (1998). Affectivity, organizational stressors, and absenteeism: A causal model of burnout and its consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 52(1), 1-23.

Judge, T. A., Thoreson, C. J., Bono, J. E., & Patton, G. K. (2001). The job satisfaction-job performance relationship: A qualitative and quantitative review. Psychological Bulletin, 127(3), 376-407.

Judge, T. A., Thoresen, C. J., Pucik, V., & Welbourne, T. M. (1999). Managerial coping with organizational change: A dispositional perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(1), 107-122.

Katwyk, Van., P. T., Fox, S., Spector, P. E., & Kelloway, E. K. (2000). Using the job-related affective well-being scale(JAWS) to investigate affective responses to work stressors. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5(2), 219-230.

Marks, S. R., & MacDermid, S. M. (1996). Multiple roles and the self: A theory of role balance. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 417-432.

Meyer, J. P., Paunonen, S. V., Gellatly, I. R., Goffin, R. D., & Jackson, D. N. (1989). Organizational commitment and job performance: It's the nature of the commitment that counts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(1), 152-156.

Mowday, R. T., Steers, R. M., & Porter, L. W. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14(2), 224-247.

Nystrom, P. C. (1990). Vertical exchanges and organizational commitments of American business managers. Group & Organization Management, 15(3), 296-312.

Petty, M. M., McGee, G. W., & Cavender, J. W. (1984). A meta-analysis of the relationships between individual job satisfaction and individual performance. Academy of Management Review, 9(4), 712-721.

Rathi, N. (2011). Psychological Well-Being and Organizational Commitment: Exploration of the Relationship. working paper, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham University.

Scandura, T. A., & Graen, G. B. (1984). Moderating effects of initial leader-member exchange status on the effects of a leadership intervention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(3), 428-436.

Sobel, M. E. (1982). A symptom intervals for indirect effects in structure equation models. In S. Leinhart(Ed..), Sociological Methodology (pp. 290-312). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Somers, M. J. (1995). Organizational commitment, turnover and absenteeism: An examination of direct and interaction effects. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16(1), 49-58.

Staw, B. M., Sutton, R. I., & Pelled, L. H. (1994). Employee positive emotion and favorable outcomes at the workplace. Organization Science, 5(1), 51-71.

Stone, A. A., Neale, J. M., Cox, D. S., Napoli, A., Valdimarsdottir, H., & Kennedy-Moore, E. (1994). Daily event are associated with a secretory immune response to an oral antigen in men. Health Psychology, 13(5), 440-446.

Wright, T. A., & Staw, B. M. (1999). Affect and favorable work outcomes: Two longitudinal tests of the happy-productive worker thesis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20(1), 1-23.

Most read articles by the same author(s)