The influence of demographic and cognitive diversity and personality factors on team performance 인구통계학적 다양성, 인지다양성 및 성격 특성을 중심으로

Main Article Content

YounHee Roh
YoungWoo Sohn

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of team composition on team performance. A total of 67 student teams participated in their team-based task for more than 10 weeks and a team is an unit of analysis. The composition variables included demographic diversity (gender and college starting year), cognitive diversity, and Big Five personality factors. To test the hypothesis that there will be significant differences in team performance between three groups (low-, medium-, and high-diversity) varying with demographic (gender and college starting year) and cognitive diversity, one-way ANOVAs and post-hoc analyses were used. Findings regarding gender diversity revealed that team performance was greater for medium- and low-diversity groups than for high-diversity group. While findings regarding college starting year revealed that team performance was greater for low- and high-diversity groups than for medium-diversity group, findings regarding cognitive diversity measured by diversity of attending colleges revealed that team performance was greater for medium-diversity group than for high-diversity group. These findings suggest that there will be an optimal level of diversity for enhancing team performance. Then we examined the relationships between Big Five personality factors as team composition variables and team outcomes. Team extroversion showed positive relationships with the creative part and team presentation. However, the minimum of team agreeableness showed negative relationships with the logical part of team performance, which was the opposite of our hypothesis. We discussed that the personality factors for team composition could vary with task characteristics.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...
 

Article Details

Section
Empirical Articles
Author Biography

YounHee Roh, Korea University

Brain-Based Psychology

References

권석균, 최보인 (2012). 다양성이 팀 프로세스 활성화와 효과성에 미치는 영향, 인사조직연구, 20(2), 1-46.
류수영 (2012). 집단구성의 다양성과 군자적 리더십이 집단성과에 미치는 영향: 군자적 리더십의 조절효과 검증. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 25(1), 27-58.
민윤기 (2004). 사회과학 연구법과 결과해석. 서울: 시그마프레스.
성상현, 이종건, 박헌준 (2007). 다양성이 프로젝트 팀의 성과에 미치는 영향, 인사조직연구, 15(2), 39-70.
안여명, 유태용 (2010). 개인 및 팀 수준에서 성격와 적응수행 간의 관계: 일반적 자기효능감의 매개효과와 변혁적 리더십의 조절 효과, 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 23(1), 155-179.
태원유, 이상우, 윤우근, 서의정 (2011). 창의와 혁신의 원동력, 인력 다양성 관리. CEO Information, 822호.
한국교육심리학회 (1999). 교육심리학 용어사전. 서울: 학지사.
한주희 (1998). 팀조직의 생산성에 관한 연구: 팀의 성격 특성, 팀경영 및 팀성과의 관계. 생산성논집, 12(3), 381-403.
Allison, P. D. (1978). Measures of inequality. American Sociological Review, 43, 865-880.
Arthur, W., Jr., Bell, S. T., & Edwards, B. D. (2007). A longitudinal examination of the comparative criterion-related validity of additive and referent-shift consensus operationalizations of team efficacy. Organizational Research Methods, 10, 35-58.
Baker, D. P., & Salas, E. (1997). Principles and measuring teamwork: A summary and look toward the future. In M. T. Brannick, E. Salas, & C. Prince (Eds.), Team performance assessment and measurement: Theory, methods, and applications (pp.331-355). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bantel, K. A., & Jackson, S. E. (1989). Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference? Strategic Management Journal, 10, 107-124.
Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1-26.
Barrick, M. R., Stewart, G. L., Neubert, M. J., & Mount, M. K. (1998). Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 377-391.
Berscheid, E., & Reis H. T. (1998). Attraction and close relationships. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology, pp.193-281. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Blau, P. M. (1977). Inequality and heterogeneity, New York: Free Press.
Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analyses. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp.349-381). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Brodbeck, F. (2003). Contradiction as an inhibitor and facilitator of group performance. Paper presented at the 11th European Congress of Work and Organizational Psychology, Lisbon, Portugal.
Bunderson, J. S., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2002). Comparing alternative conceptualizations of functional diversity in management teams: Process and performance effects. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 875-893.
Chan, D. (1998). Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of comparison models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 234-246.
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory and New Five-Factor Inventory: Professional manual, Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Cox, T., & Blake, S. (1991). Managing cultural diversity: Implications for organizational competitiveness. Academy of Management Executive, 5(3), 45-56.
Dahlin K. B., Weingart, L. R., & Hinds, P. J. (2005). Team diversity and information use. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 1107-1123.
Devine, D. J., & Phillips, J. L. (2001). Do smarter teams do better? A meta-analysis of cognitive ability and team performance. Small Group Research, 32, 507-532.
Fenwick, G. D., & Neal, D. J. (2001). Effect of Gender Composition on Group Performance. Work & Organization, 8, 205-225.
Fields, D. L., & Blum, T. C. (1997). Employee satisfaction in work groups with different gender composition. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 181-196.
Frank, B. B. (1986). Cognitive styles and teacher education: Field dependence and areas specialization mong teacher education majors. Journal of Educational Research, 1, 19-22.
Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public-domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In Merviedle, I. Deary, F. De Fruyt, & F Ostendorf(Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe( Vol. 7, pp.7-28). Tilburg University Press: The Netherlands.
Graziano, W. G., Hair, E. C., & Finch, J. F. (1997). Competitiveness mediated the link between personality and group performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1394-1408.
Griffith, B., & Hesketh, B. (2004). Why openness to experience is not a good predictor of job performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12, 243-251.
Hambrick, D. C., Cho, T. S., & Chen, M. J. (1996). The influence of top management team heterogeneity on firms’ competitive moves. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 659- 684.
Harrison, D. A., Price, K. H., & Bell, M. P. (1998). Beyond relational demography: Time and the effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on work group cohesion. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 96-107.
Harrison, D. A., Price, K. H., Gavin, J. H., & Florey, A. T. (2002). Time, teams and task performance: Changing effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on group functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1029-1045.
Hollenbeck, J. R., DeRue, D. S., & Guzzo, R. (2004). Bridging the gap between I/O research and HR practice: Improving team composition, team training, and team task design. Human Resource Management, 43, 353- 366.
Horwitz, S. K., & Horwitz, I. B. (2007). The effects of team diversity on team outcomes: A meta-analytic review of team demography. Journal of Management, 33, 987-1015.
Hurtz, G. M., & Donovan, J. J. (2000). Personality and job performance: The Big Five revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 869- 879.
Jackson, C. L., Colquitt, J. A., Wesson, M. J., & Zapata-Phelan, C. P. (2006) Psychological collectivism: A measurement validation and linkage to group member performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 884-899.
Jackson, S. E. (1992). Team composition in organizational settings: Issues in managing an increasingly diverse work force. In S. Worchel, W. Wood, & J. A. Simpson (Eds.), Group Process and Productivity, (pp.138-173). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Jackson, S. E., & Joshi, A. (2004). Diversity in social context: a multi-attribute, multilevel analysis of team diversity and sales performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 675-702.
Jackson, S. E., Joshi, A., & Erhardt, N. L. (2003). Recent research on team and organizational diversity: SWOT analysis and implications. Journal of Management, 29, 801-830.
Jackson, S. E., May, K. E., & Whitney, K. (1995). Understanding the dynamics of diversity in decision-making teams. In R. A. Guzzo & E. Salas (Eds.), Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations (pp.204-261). SanFrancisco: Jossey-Bass.
James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 85-98.
Jehn K. A., & Bezrukova, K. (2004). A field study of group diversity, workgroup context, and performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 703-729.
Jehn, K. A., & Mannix, E. A. (2001). The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 238-251.
Jehn, K. A., Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. (1999). Why differences make a difference: A field study in diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 741-763.
Kilduff, M., Angelmar, R., & Mehra, A. (2000). Top management-team diversity and firm performance: Examining the role of cognitions. Organization Science, 11, 21-34.
Klein, K. J., Bliese, P. D., Kozlowski, S. W. J., Dansereau, F., Gavin, M. B., Griffin, M. A. Hofmann, D. A. James, L. R., Yammarino, F. J., & Bligh, M. C. (2000). Multilevel analytical technique: commonalities, differences, and continuing questions. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp.512-553). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Bell, B. S. (2003). Work groups and teams in organizations. In W. C. Borman & D. R. Ilgen (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 12, pp.333-375). New York: Wiley.
Kristof-Brown, A., Barrick, M. R., & Stevens, C. K. (2005). When opposites attract: A multi-sample demonstration of complementary person-team fit on extraversion. Journal of Personality, 73, 935-958.
LePine, J. A. (2003). Team adaptation and postchange performance: The effects of team composition in terms of members' cognitive ability and personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 27-39.
LePine, J. A., Hollenbeck, J. R., & Ilgen, D. R. (1997). Effects of individual differences on the performance of hierarchical decision making teams: Much more than g. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 803-811.
Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. (1990). Progress in small group research. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 585-634.
Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26, 356-376.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 81-90.
Messick, S. (1984). The nature of cognitive styles: Problems and promise in educational practice. Educational Psychologist, 19, 59-74.
Miller, C. C., Burke, L. M., & Glick, W. H. (1998). Cognitive diversity among upper- echelon executives: Implications for strategic decision processes. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 39-58.
Milliken, F. J., & Martins, L. L. (1996). Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 21, 402-433.
Mohammed, S., & Angell, L. C. (2004). Surface and deep-level diversity in workgroups: Examining the moderating effects of team orientation and team process on relationship conflict. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 1015-1039.
Morgan, F. P., & Lassiter, D. L. (1992). Team composition and staffing. In R. W. Sweezy & E. Salas (Eds.), Teams: Their training and performance (pp.75-100). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
Murnighan, J. K., Conlon, D. E. (1991). The dynamics of intense work groups: A study of British string quartets. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 165-186.
O’Reilly, C. A., Caldwell, D. F., & Barnett, W. P. (1989). Work group demography, social integration, and turnover. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34, 21-37.
Pazy, A., & Oron, I. (2001). Sex proportion and performance evaluation among high-ranking military officers. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 689-702.
Pelled, L. H. (1996). Demographic diversity, conflict, and work group outcomes: An intervening process theory. Organization Science, 7, 615-631.
Pfeffer, J. (1983). Organizational demography. Research in Organizational Behavior, 5, 299-357.
Porter, C. O. L. H., Hollenbeck, J. R., Ilgen, D. R., Ellis, A. P. J., West, B. J., & Moon, H. (2003). Backing up behaviors in teams: The role of personality and the legitimacy of need. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 391-403.
Reilly, R. R., Lynn, G. S., & Aronson, Z. H. (2002). The role of personality in new product development team performance. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 19, 39-58.
Rentsch, J. R., & Klimoski, R. J. (2001). Why do ‘great minds’ think alike? Antecedents of team member schema agreement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 107-122.
Richard, O. C. (2000). Racial diversity, business strategy, and firm performance: A resource- based view. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 164-177.
Richard, O. C, Barnett, T., Dwyer, S., & Chadwick, K. (2004). Cultural diversity in management, firm performance, and the moderating role of entrepreneurial orientation dimensions. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 255-266.
Salgado, J. F. (1997). The five factor model of personality and job performance in the European Community. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 30-43.
Simons, T., Pelled, L. H., & Smith, K. A. (1999). Making use of difference: Diversity, debate, and decision comprehensiveness in top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 662-673.
Steiner, I. (1972). Group processes and productivity. New York: Academic Press.
Stewart, G. L. (2003). Toward an understanding of the multilevel role of personality in teams. In M. R. Barrick & A. M. Ryan (Eds.), Personality and work: Reconsidering the role of personality in organizations: 183-204. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Stewart, G. L. (2006). A Meta-Analytic Review of Relationships Between Team Design Features and Team Performance. Journal of Management, 32, 29-55.
Stewart, G. L., Fulmer, I. S., & Barrick, M. R. (2005). An exploration of member roles as a multilevel linking mechanism for individual traits and team outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 58, 343-365.
Teachman, J. D. (1980). Analysis of population diversity. Sociological methods and research, 8, 341-362.
Timmerman, T. A. (2000). Racial diversity, age diversity, interdependence, and team performance. Small Group Research, 31, 592- 606.
van Knippenberg, D., & Schippers, M. C. (2007). Work Group Diversity. Annual Review of Psychology Vol. 58, 515-541.
Wagner, G. W., Pfeffer, J., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1984). Organizational demography and turnover. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 74-92.
Watson, W. E., Johnson, L., & Merritt, D. (1998). Team orientation, self-orientation, and diversity in task groups: Their connection to team performance over time. Group & Organization Management, 23, 161-189.
Webber, S. S., & Donahue, L. M. (2001). Impact of highly and less job-related diversity on work group cohesion and performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 27, 141- 162.
Williams, K. Y., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1998). Demography and diversity in organizations: a review of 40 years of research. Research in Organizational Behavior. 20, 77-140.
Witkin, H. A., Moore, C. A., Goodenough, D. R., & Cox, P. W. (1977). Role of the field- dependent cognitive styles in academic evaluation: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 31-50.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>