Validation of the Korean version of Multidimensional Calling Measure(MCM-K)

Main Article Content

YooJin Ha
Yeeun Choi
HaeYoung Eun
YoungWoo Sohn


The purpose of the present research was to examine the reliability, validity and factorial structure of the Korean version of Multidimensional Calling Measure(MCM). The items from the original scale were translated into Korean and back-translated prior to the distribution to 385 working adults in various vocations. Internal and external values were used in order to test convergent and discriminant validities, and Brief Calling Scale and Korean version of the Calling and Vocation Questionnaire(CVQ-K) were used in terms of examining concurrent validity. In addition, autonomy was used as the independent variable, and several work-related variables(career commitment, organizational commitment, organizational identification, and burnout) as well as life-related variables (meaning in life and life satisfaction) were used as dependent variables for testing predictive validity. Results from the confirmatory factor analysis supported the three factor structure in the Korean version, as in the original scale. MCM-K showed higher correlation with the internal value than the external value, and it also showed significant positive relationship with both Brief Calling Scale(BCS) and Korean version of Calling and Vocation Questionnaire(CVQ-K). Furthermore, the relationships with independent and dependent variables were consistent with previous research, confirming the predictive validity of the scale. Such results altogether imply that MCM-K is a reliable and valid tool for measuring and studying the concept of calling within Korean society. Directions for future research and limitations were also discussed.


Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
Ha, Y., Choi, Y., Eun, H., & Sohn, Y. (2014). Validation of the Korean version of Multidimensional Calling Measure(MCM-K). Korean Journal of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 27(1), 191–220.
Empirical Articles

Funding data


고득영 (2011). 직무자율성이 혁신행동에 미치는 영향: 직무만족의 매개효과와 성격과 조직혁신풍토의 조절효과를 중심으로. 광운대학교 산업심리학과 대학원 석사학위 논문.

김도영, 유태용 (2002). 성격의 5요인과 조직에서의 맥락수행간의 관계. 한국 심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 15(2), 1-24.

김미희, 신유형, 문철우 (2012). 개인-직무 적합성과 과업 및 맥락 성과: 과업 중요성과 자율성의 조절효과를 중심으로. 인사조직연구, 20, 93-128.

남유진 (2013). 행정조직의 임파워링 리더십, 직무만족, 혁신행동 및 직무임베디드니스 간의 관련성에 관한 연구: 직무의미성과 절차공정성의 매개효과를 중심으로. 금오공과 대학원 박사학위논문.

대한상공회의소 (2013). 100대 기업이 원하는 인재상 보고서. 조사보고서.

박지연 (2004). 개인-조직, 개인-직무, 개인-상사간 부합성: 관련변인 규명 및 문화 간 비교. 서울대학교 심리학과 석사학위논문.

심창현 (2013). 팀 리더의 지원적 리더십과 성과 및 OCB 간 관계에 대한 매개 및 조절 효과의 다수준적 접근. 한양대학교 석사학위논문.

안관영, 김민환 (1999). 직무특성과 조직시민행동간의 관계에 대한 재직기간과 성취욕구의 조절효과에 관한 연구. 한국산학경영연구.

유태용, 현희정 (2003). 개인과 환경간 부합 연구에서 다차항 회귀분석과 반응표면 방법론의 적용. 한국 심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 16(2), 1-19.

이종현 (2009). 성격 6요인과 과업 및 맥락수행간의 관계. 아주대학교 심리학과 석사학위논문.

이지우 (1997). 직무특성과 종업원 태도 사이의 관계에 대한 직무몰입의 매개역할. 한국인사ㆍ조직학회, 5(1), 87-122.

이학종 (1977). 한국기업의 문화적 특성과 새 기업문화개발. 서울: 박영사

최명옥 (2004). 개인의 태도 및 행동에 대한 개인-환경간 부합의 영향: 상호작용 효과를 중심으로. 광운대학교 산업심리학과 석사학위논문.

파이낸셜 뉴스 (2013). 새해 직장상사에게 가장 바라는 점 1위. 2013년 1월 8일. http://

현희정 (2002). 개인-조직, 개인-직무, 개인-상사간 부합이 개인의 태도에 미치는 영향: 다차항회귀분석과 반응표면 분석의 적용. 광운대학교 산업심리학과 석사학위논문.

황애영, 탁진국 (2011). 주도성이 주관적 경력성공에 미치는 영향: 프로틴 (protean) 경력지향을 매개변인으로. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 24(2), 409-428.

LG 경제연구원 (2012). ‘자기주도성’, 조직의 혁신과 변화의 동력.

WU QIONG (2013). 주도적 성격이 주도적 행동에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구. 세종대학교 석사학위논문.

Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Sage.

Ashford, S. J., & Black, J. S. (1996). Proactivity during organizational entry: The role of desire for control. Journal of Applied psychology, 81(2), 199. DOI:

Baba, V. V., Tourigny, L., Wang, X., & Liu, W. (2009). Proactive personality and work performance in China: The moderating effects of emotional exhaustion and perceived safety climate. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l'Administration, 26(1), 23-37. DOI:

Bakker, A. B., Tims, M., & Derks, D. (2012). Proactive personality and job performance: The role of job crafting and work engagement. human relations, 65(10), 1359-1378. DOI:

Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1993). Autonomy as a moderator of the relationships between the Big Five personality dimensions and job performance. Journal of applied Psychology, 78(1), 111. DOI:

Bass, B. M. (1990). Handbook of leadership: A survey of theory and research. Free Press.

Bateman, T. S., & Grant, J. M. (1993). The proactive component of organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14, 103-118. DOI:

Bem, D. J., & Allen, A. (1974). On predicting some of the people some of the time: The search for cross-situational consistencies in behavior. Psychological review, 81(6), 506. DOI:

Bem, D. J., & Funder, D. C. (1978). Predicting more of the people more of the time: Assessing the personality of situations. Psychological Review, 85(6), 485. DOI:

Cable, D. M., & Judge, T. A. (1996). Person-Organization fit, job choice decisions, and organizational entry. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67, 294-311. DOI:

Campbell, D. J. (2000). The proactive employee: Managing workplace initiative. The Academy of Management Executive, 14(3), 52-66. DOI:

Campion, M. A., Medsker, G. J., & Higgs, A. C. (1993). Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel psychology, 46(4), 823-847. DOI:

Chatman, J. A. (1991). Matching people and organizations: Selection and socialization in public accounting firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 459-484. DOI:

Choi, H. S., &Thompson, L. (2005). Old wine in a new bottle: Impact of membership change on group creativity. Organizational Behavior and human decision processes, 98(2), 121-132. DOI:

Choi, J. N., Price, R. H., & Vinokur, A. D. (2003). Self‐efficacy changes in groups: effects of diversity, leadership, and group climate. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(4), 357-372. DOI:

Colbert, A. E., & Witt, L. A. (2009). The role of goal-focused leadership in enabling the expression of conscientiousness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(3), 790. DOI:

Crant, J. M. (1995). The Proactive Personality Scale and objective job performance among real estate agents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(4), 532. DOI:

Crant, J. M. (2000). Proactive behavior in organizations. Journal of Management, 26(3), 435-462. DOI:

Crant, J. M., & Bateman, T. S. (2000). Charismatic leadership viewed from above: The impact of proactive personality. Journal of organizational Behavior, 21(1), 63-75. DOI:<63::AID-JOB8>3.0.CO;2-J

Crant. J. M. & Bateman, T. S., (2004). The central role of proactive behavior. In S. K. Parker & C. G. Collins (Chairs), Proactivity: Enhancing understanding of self-starting and dynamic action within organizations. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the Academy of Management, New Orleans, L.A.

Dierdorff, E. C., Rubin, R. S., & Bachrach, D. G. (2012). Role expectations as antecedents of citizenship and the moderating effects of work context. Journal of Management, 38(2), 573-598. DOI:

Dragoni, L. (2005). Understanding the emergence of state goal orientation in organizational work groups: the role of leadership and multilevel climate perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1084. DOI:

Fahr, J., Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. 1990. Accounting for organizational citizenship behavior: Leader fairness and task scope versus satisfaction. Journal of Management, 16: 705- 722.

Fiedler, F. E. (1996). Research on leadership selection and training: One view of the future. Administrative Science Quarterly, 241-250. DOI:

Ford, D. K. (2011). An Evaluation of Moderating Influences of Employee Proactive Personality: Empowerment and Political Skill. Portland State University.

Frese, M., Kring, W., Soose, A., & Zempel, J. (1996). Personal initiative at work: Differences between East and West Germany. Academy of Management Journal, 39(1), 37-63.

Fried, Y., & Ferris, G. R. (1986). The dimensionality of job characteristics: Some neglected issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 419. DOI:

Fuller, J. B., Barnett, T., Hester, K., & Relyea, C. (2003). A social identity perspective on the relationship between perceived organizational support and organizational commitment. The Journal of Social Psychology, 143(6), 789-791. DOI:

Fuller, Jerry Bryan, Jr, Hester, K., & Cox, S. S. (2010). Proactive personality and job performance: Exploring job autonomy as a moderator. Journal of Managerial Issues, 22(1), 35-51, 6.

Greguras, G. J., & Diefendorff, J. M. (2010). Why does proactive personality predict employee life satisfaction and work behaviors? A field investigation of the mediating role of the self-concordance model. Personnel Psychology, 63(3), 539-560. DOI:

Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1975). Development of the job diagnostic survey. Journal of Applied psychology, 60(2), 159. DOI:

Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1980). Work redesign. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Hersey, P., & Blanchard, K. H. (1993). Management of organizational behavior: Utilizing human resources . Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Hochwarter, W. A., Witt, L. A., Treadway, D. C., & Ferris, G. R. (2006). The interaction of social skill and organizational support on job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(2), 482. DOI:

Hough, L. M., &Schneider, R. J. (1996). Personality traits, taxonomies, and applications in organizations. Individual differences and behavior in organizations, 31-88.

House, R. J., &Mitchell, T. R. (1974). Path goal theory of leadership in Fred Luthans (ed.) Contemporary Readings in Organizational Behavior.

James, L. R., Choi, C. C., Ko, C. H. E., McNeil, P. K., Minton, M. K., Wright, M. A., & Kim, K. I. (2008). Organizational and psychological climate: A review of theory and research. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 17(1), 5-32. DOI:

Kacmar, K. M., Collins, B. J., Harris, K. J., & Judge, T. A. (2009). Core self-evaluations and job performance: the role of the perceived work environment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(6), 1572. DOI:

Kamdar, D., & Van Dyne, L. (2007). The joint effects of personality and workplace social exchange relationships in predicting task performance and citizenship performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(5), 1286. DOI:

Kim, T. Y., Cable, D. M., &Kim, S. P. (2005). Socialization tactics, employee proactivity, and person-organization fit. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(2), 232. DOI:

Lee, K., & Allen, N. J. (2002). Organizational citizenship behavior and workplace deviance: the role of affect and cognitions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 131. DOI:

Light, D., Keller, S., & Calhoun, C. (1975). Sociology. New York: Alfred A.

Lutrick, E. C., & Moriarty, K. O. (2002). Measuring perceived PO fit directly and indirectly: Does method matter. In 17th annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Toronto, Canada.

Major, D. A., Turner, J. E., & Fletcher, T. D. (2006). Linking proactive personality and the Big Five to motivation to learn and development activity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 927. DOI:

Mischel, W. (1977). The interaction of person and situation. Personality at the crossroads: Current issues in interactional psychology, 333, 352.

Monson, T. C., Hesley, J. W., & Chernick, L. (1982). Specifying when personality traits can and cannot predict behavior: An alternative to abandoning the attempt to predict single-act criteria. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(2), 385. DOI:

Morgeson, F. P., &Humphrey, S. E. (2006). The Work Design Questionnaire (WDQ): developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. Journal of applied psychology, 91(6), 1321. DOI:

Ng, T. W., Eby, L. T., Sorensen, K. L., & Feldman, D. C. (2005). Predictors of objective and subjective career success: A meta‐analysis. Personnel psychology, 58(2), 367-408. DOI:

Northouse, P. G. (2004). Leadership: theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Oliver, T. C., & Powell, D. M. (2012). Other-Rating and Context-Specific Personality Judgments of Agreeableness and Extraversion. Journal of Organizational Psychology, 12(1), 43- 56.

Organ, D. W., & Konovsky, M. (1989). Cognitive versus affective determinants of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of applied psychology, 74(1), 157. DOI:

Ouchi, W. G., & Wilkins, A. L. (1985). Organizational culture. Annual review of sociology, 11(1), 457-483. DOI:

Parker, S. K. (1998). Enhancing role breadth self-efficacy: the roles of job enrichment and other organizational interventions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(6), 835. DOI:

Pearce, J. L., & Gregersen, H. B. (1991). Task interdependence and extrarole behavior: A test of the mediating effects of felt responsibility. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(6), 838. DOI:

Pitt, L. F., Ewing, M. T., & Berthon, P. R. (2002). Proactive behavior and industrial salesforce performance. Industrial marketing management, 31(8), 639-644. DOI:

Podsakoff, P. M., Ahearne, M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (1997). Organizational citizenship behavior and the quantity and quality of work group performance. Journal of applied psychology, 82(2), 262. DOI:

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of applied psychology, 88(5), 879. DOI:

Rafferty, A. E., & Griffin, M. A. (2004). Dimensions of transformational leadership: Conceptual and empirical extensions. The leadership quarterly, 15(3), 329-354. DOI:

Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: a review of the literature. Journal of applied psychology, 87(4), 698. DOI:

Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of management journal, 37(3), 580-607.

Seibert, S. E., Crant, J. M., & Kraimer, M. L. (1999). Proactive personality and career success. Journal of applied psychology, 84(3), 416. DOI:

Schein, E. H. (1992). Coming to a new awareness of organizational culture (pp.237-54). Sage.

Smith, C. A., Organ, D. W., &Near, J. P. (1983). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. Journal of applied psychology, 68(4), 653. DOI:

Stagner, R. (1977). On the reality and relevance of traits. The Journal of General Psychology, 96(2), 185-207. DOI:

Steger, M. F., Pickering, N. K., Shin, J. Y., & Dik, B. J. (2010). Calling in work: Secular or sacred? Journal of Career Assessment, 18, 82-96. DOI:

Tett, R. P., & Burnett, D. D. (2003). A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 500. DOI:

Tett, R. P., & Guterman, H. A. (2000). Situation trait relevance, trait expression, and cross-situational consistency: Testing a principle of trait activation. Journal of Research in Personality, 34, 397-423. DOI:

Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. Aufl. New York ua.

Thompson, J. A. 2005. “Proactive Personality and Job Performance: A Social Capital Perspective.” Journal of Applied Psychology 90: 1011-1017. DOI:

Turban, D. B., Lau, C. M., Ngo, N. V., Chow, I. H. S., & Si, S. (2001). Organizational attractiveness offirms in the people's Republic of China: A person-organization fit perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 194-206 DOI:

Van Dyne, L., Graham, J. W., & Dienesch, R. M. (1994). Organizational citizenship behavior: Construct redefinition, measurement, and validation. Academy of management Journal, 37(4), 765-802.

Van Knippenberg, D., Van Dick, R., & Tavares, S. (2007). Social identity and social exchange: Identification, support, and withdrawal from the job. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37(3), 457-477. DOI:

Weiss, H. M., &Adler, S. (1984). Personality and organizational behavior. Research in organizational behavior.

Yun, S., Cox, J., & Sims Jr, H. P. (2006). The forgotten follower: a contingency model of leadership and follower self-leadership. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(4), 374-388. DOI:

Zerbe, W. J., & Paulhus, D. L. (1987). Socially desirable responding in organizational behavior: A reconception. Academy of Management Review, 12(2), 250-264. DOI:

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>