김영식, 서용원 (2015). 조직구성원의 개인주의-집합주의 가치지향성이 정서표현 및 호감도에 미치는 효과. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 28(4), 565-598.
서수균, 권석만 (2002). 자존감 및 자기애 성향과 공격성의 관계. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 21(4), 809-826.
임성만 (2006). 조직신뢰와 구성원 신뢰의 기반 요인 및 관계성. 서울대학교 박사학위논문.
이병주, 장재윤 (2014). 간호사가 지각하는 의사와의 갈등 전이: 전이 형태와 정서의 매개역할. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 27(2), 449-469.
이순묵 (2006). 요인분석의 기초. 서울: 교육과학사.
조긍호 (1993). 대인 평가의 문화간 차이 대인 평가 이원모형의 확대-서론. 한국심리학회지: 사회, 7(1), 124-149.
조수연 (2007). 팀 내 갈등 측정도구 개발 및 타당화. 성균관대학교 석사학위논문.
조영호 (2001). “동적 집합주의”:한국재벌기업의 기업문화. 국제지역연구, 5(1), 103-124.
최상진, 김기범 (1999). 한국인의 Self의 특성: 서구의 self개념과 대비를 중심으로. 한국 심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 13(2), 275-292.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitude and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Amason, A. C. (1996). Distinguishing the effects on functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: Resolving a paradox for top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 39(1), 123-148.
Baumeister, R. F. (1998). The self. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 680-740). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Muraven, M., & Tice, D. M. (1998). Ego-depletion: is the active self a limited resource? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1252-1265.
Baumeister, R. F., & Scher, S. J. (1998). Self-defeating behavior patterns among normal individuals: Review and analysis of common self-destructive tendencies. Psychology Bulletin, 104, 3-22.
Baumeister, R. F., Smart, L., & Boden, M. (1996). Relation of threatened egotism to violence and aggression: The dark side of high self-esteem, Psychological Review, 103, 5-33.
Behfar, K. J., Mannix, E. A., Peterson, R. S., & Trochim, W. M. (2011). Conflict in small groups: The Meaning and consequences of process conflict. Small Group Research, 42(2), 127-176.
Behfar, K. J., Peterson, R. S., Mannix, E. A., & Trochim, W. M. (2008). The Critical Role of Conflict Resolution in Teams: A Close Look at the Links Between Conflict Type, Conflict Management Strategies, and Team Outcomes. Journal of Applied psychology, 93(1), 170-188.
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance Tests and Goodness of fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.
Bernieri, F. J. (2001). Toward a taxonomy of interpersonal sensitivity. In J. A. Hall & F. J. Bernieri(Eds.), Interpersonal sensitivity: Theory and measurement(pp. 3-20). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Bradley, B. H., Anderson, H. J., Baur, J. E., & Klotz, A. C. (2015). When Conflict Helps: Integrating Evidence for Beneficial Conflict in Groups and Team Under Three Perspectives, Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 19(4), 243-272.
Bradley, B. H., Postlethwaite, B. E., Klotz, A. C., Hamdani, M. R., & Brown, K. G. (2012). Reaping the benefits of task conflict in teams: The critical role of team psychological safety climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 151-158.
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long(Eds.): Testing Structural Equation Models. Sage Publications.
Carney, D. R., & Harrigan, J. A. (2003). It takes one to know one: Interpersonal sensitivity is related to accurate assessments of others' interpersonal sensitivity, Emotion, 3, 194-200.
Cho, Y. H., Yu, G. C., Joo, M. K., & Rowley, Chris. (2014). Changing corporate culture over time in south korea. Asian Pacific Business Review. 20(1), 9-17.
Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E.(1997). What makes team work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23(3), 239-290.
Cohen, G. L., & Sherman, D. K. (2002). Accepting threatening information: Self- affirmation and the reduction of defensive biases. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 119-123.
Colquitt, J. A., Scott, B. A., & Lepine, J. A. (2007). Trust, Trustworthiness, and Trust Propensity: A Meta-Analytic Test of Their Unique Relationships With Risk Taking and Job Performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 909-927.
Coopersmith, S. (1967). The antecedents of self-esteem. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press Inc.
De Dreu, C. K. W. (2011). Conflict at work: Basic principles and applied issues. In S. Zedeck(Ed.), APA Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology(Vol, 3). Washington, DC
De Dreu, C. K. W. (2006). When Too Little or Too Much Hurts: Evidence for a Curvilinear Relationship Between Task Conflict and Innovation in Teams. Journal of Management, 32(1), 83-107.
De Dreu, C. K., & Gelfnad, M. J. (Eds.). (2008). The psychology of conflict and conflict management in organizations. New York, NY: Erlbaum.
De Dreu, C. K., & van Knippenberg, D. (2005). The possessive self as a barrier to conflict resolution: Effects of mere ownership, process accountability, and self-concept clarity on competitive cognitions and behavior, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 345-357.
De Dreu, C. K. & Weingart, L. R. (2003). A contingency theory of task conflict and performance in group and organizational teams. In M. A. West, D.
De Dreu, C. K., & West, M. A. (2001). Minority dissent and team innovation: The Importance of participation in decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 1191-1201.
Deutsch, M. (1949). A theory of cooperation and competition. Human Relations, 2, 129-152.
Deutsch, M. (1973). The resolution of conflict: Constructive and destructive processes. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
de Wit, F. R. C., Greer, L. L., & Jehn, K. A. (2012). The paradox of intragroup conflict: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(2), 360-390.
de Wit, F. R. C., Jehn, K. A., & Scheepers, D. (2013). Task conflict, information processing, and decision-making: The damaging effect of relationship conflict. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 122(2), 177- 189.
DuBois, D. L., & Flay, B. R. (2004). The healthy pursuit of self-esteem: comment on and alternative to the crocker and park(2004) formulation. Psychological Bulletin, 130(3), 415-420.
Dulewicz, V., Higgs, M., & Slaski. M. (2003). Measuring emotional intelligence: Content, construct and criterion-related validity. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 18(5), 405-420.
Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams, Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 350-383.
Engelberg, E., & Sjöberg, L. (2004). Emotional intelligence, affect intensity, and social adjustment. Personality & Individual Differences, 37, 533-542.
Evan, W. (1965). Conflict and performance in R&D organizations. Industrial Management Review, 7, 37-46.
Forsyth, D. R. (2014). 집단역학 5판 [Gorup dynamics]. (남기덕, 노혜경, 안미영, 이종택, 이진환, & 최훈석 역). 서울 CENGAGE Learning. (원전은 2010에 출판).
Gelfand, M. J., Leslie, L. M., Keller, K., & De Dreu, C. K. (2012). Conflict culture in organizations: how leaders shape conflict cultures and their organization-level consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(6), 1131-1147.
Gomero, N., González-Romá, V., & Peiró, J. M. (2008). The influence of intra-team conflict on work team's affective climate: A longitudinal study. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 81, 47-69.
Greer, L. L., Jehn, K. A., & Mannix, E. A. (2008). Conflict transformation: An exploration of the inter-relationships between task, relationship, and process conflict. Small Group Research, 39, 278-302.
Guenter, H., van Emmerik, H., Schreurs, B., Kuypers, T., van Iterson, A., & Notelaers, G. (2016). When task conflict becomes personal: The impact of perceived team performance. Small Group Research, 47(5), 569-604.
Hackman, J. R., & Morris, C. G. (1975). Group task, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration. In L. Berkowitz(Eds). Advanced in experimental social psychology, 8, 45-99. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York: Wiley.
Hemmati, T., Mills, J. F., & Kroner, D. G. (2004). The validity of the Bar-On emtional intelligence quotient in an offender population. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 695-706.
Hu, L. T. & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55.
Hunt, N., & Evans, D. (2004). Predicting traumatic stress using emotional intelligence. Behavior Research and Therapy, 42(7), 791-798.
Janssen, O., Van de Vliert, E., & Veenstra, C. (1999). How task and person conflict shape the role of positive interdependence in management teams. Journal of Managment, 25(2), 117-141.
Jehn, K. A. (1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 256-282.
Jehn, K. A., & Bendersky, C. (2003). Intragroup conflict in organizations: A contingency perspective on the conflict-outcome relationship. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 187- 242.
Jehn, K. A., & Mannix, E. A. (2001). The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 238-251.
Jehn, K. A., Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. (1999). Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups, Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4), 741-763.
Jehn, K. A., Rispens, S., & Thatcher, S. M. B. (2010). The effects of conflict asymmetry on work group and individual outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 596-616.
Kelley, H. H. (1979). Personal relationships: Their structures and processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kernis, M. H., Grannemann, B. D., & Barclay, L. C. (1989). Stability and level of self-esteem as predictors of anger arousal and hostility, Journal of personality and social psychology, 56, 1013-1022.
Kerwin, S., Doherty, A., & Harman, A. (2011). “it's not conflict, it's differences on opinion”: An in-depth examination of conflict in nonprofit boards. Small Group Research, 42(5), 562-594.
Klein, J. K., Dansereau, F., & Hall, R. J. (1994). Level issues in theory development, data collection, and analysis. Academy of Management Review, 19(2), 195-229.
Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Klein, K. J. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 3-90). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Kruglanski, A. W., & Webster, D. M. (1991). Group members' reactions to opinion deviates and conformists at varying degrees of proximity to decision deadline and of environmental noise. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 215-225.
Lewis, J. D., & Weigert, A. (1985). Trust as a social reality. Social Forces, 63, 967-985.
Markus, H. R. & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
Mayer, J. D., Salovey, P., & Caruso, D. R. (2000). Models of emotional intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg(Eds.), Handbook of emotional intelligence (pp. 92-117). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709-734.
Medina, F. J., Munduate, L., Dorado, M. A., Martínez, I., & Guerra, J. M. (2005). Types of intragroup conflict and affective reactions. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 20(3/4), 219- 230.
Messé, L. A., Stollak, G. E., Larson, R. W., & Michaels, G. Y. (1979). Interpersonal consequences of person perception in two social contexts, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 369-379.
Nowicki, S. Jr., & Duke, M. P. (1992). The association of children's nonverbal decoding abilities with their popularity, locus of control, and academic achievement. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 153, 385-393.
O'Neill, T. A, Allen, N. J., & Hastings. S. E., (2013). Examining the ‘pros’ and ‘cons’ of team conflict: A team-level meta-analysis of task, relationship, and process conflict. Human Performance, 26(3), 236-260.
Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking Individualism and Collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128(1), 3-72.
Pelled, L. H.(1996). Demographic diversity, conflict, and work group outcomes: An intervening process theory. Organization Science, 6, 615-631.
Pelled, L. H., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Xin, K. R. (1999). Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 1-28.
Riggio, R. E. (2001). Interpersonal sensitivity research and organizational psychology: Theoretical and methodological applications. In: Interpersonal sensitivity: Theory and measurement. Hall, J. A., & Bernieri, F. J. (Ed). Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 305-317.
Rispens, S. (2012). The Influence of Conflict Issue Importance on the Co-occurance of Task and Relationship Conflict in Teams. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 61(3), 349- 369.
Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Roseth, C. J., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2008). Promoting early adolescents' achievement and peer relationships: the effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures. Psychological Bulletin, 134(2), 223-246.
Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10). New York: Academic Press.
Rousseau, D. M., Sitikin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23, 393-404.
Schlenker, B. R., & Leary, M. R. (1982). Audiences' reactions to self-enhancing, self- denigrating, and accurate self-presentations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18(1), 89-104.
Shaw, R. B. (1997). Trust in the balance, Jossey-Bass CA.
Simons, T. L., & Peterson, R. S. (2000). Task conflict and relationship conflict in top Management teams: the pivotal role of intragroup trust, Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(1), 102-111.
Solansky, S. T., Singh, B., & Huang, S. (2014). Individual perceptions of task conflict and relationship. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 7(2), 83-98.
Steele, C. M. (1988). The psychology of self-affirmation: Sustaining the integrity of the self. In L. Berkowitz (Eds), Advanced in experimental social psychology, 21, 261-302.
Tennen, H. J., & Herzberger, S. (1987). Depression, self-esteem, and the absence of the self protective attributional biases. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 72-80.
Tjosvold, D. (1990). The goal interdependence approach to communication in conflict: An organizational study. In M. A. Rahim(Ed.), Theory and research in conflict management(pp. 15-31). New York: Praeger.
Tjosvold, D. (2008). Conflicts in the study of conflict in organizations In C. K. W. De Dreu & M. J. Gelfand (Eds.), The psychology of conflict and conflict management in organizations (pp. 445-454). New York: Erlbaum.
Tynan, R. (2005). The effects of threat sensitivity and face giving on dyadic psychological safety and upward communication. Journal of Applied Psychology, 35(2), 223-247.
Wall, J. A., & Callister, R. R. (1995). Conflict and its management. Journal of Management, 21(3), 515-558.
Warwick, J., & Nettelbeck, T. (2004). Emotional intelligence is? Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 1091-1100.
Weingart, L. R., & Jehn, K. A. (2000). Manage intra-team conflict through collaboration. In E. A. Locke (Eds), The Blackwell Handbook of Principles of Organizational Behavior (pp. 226-238). MA: Blackwell Publishers.
Yang, J., & Mossholder, K. W. (2004). Decoupling task and relationship conflict: the role of intragroup emotional processing, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 589-605.
- Abstract viewed - 105 times
- PDF downloaded - 106 times
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© Korean Journal for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2017
How to Cite
Identifying moderators of effects of task conflict on relationship conflict
관계의 질과 개인차에 따라서
Vol 30 No 3 (2017): Korean Journal of Industrial and Organizational Psychology
Submitted: Apr 18, 2019
Published: Aug 31, 2017
In this article, two studies were conducted to identify variables that moderate the effects of task conflict on relationship conflict. In the first study, Relationship quality dimension variables (trust, promotive interdependence) were used to identify moderating effects. For study 1, data were collected from 400 employees using survey questionnaires. The results showed that high level of trust and promotive interdependence buffer the effects of task conflict on relationship conflict. In study 2, Individual difference dimension (self-esteem, interpersonal sensitivity) variables were used. The data were collected from 269 employees using survey questionnaires. The results revealed that high level interpersonal sensitivity reduced the effects of task conflict on relationship conflict. Finally, implications and limitations of these results were discussed.