김은정, 이종건 (2010). 조직문화와 셀프리더십이 조직유효성에 미치는 영향. 기업경영연구, 17(1), 81-101.
나인강 (2005). 직무만족, 이직의도 및 이직행위의 관계에 대한 패널자료 분석. 대한경영학회지, 18(2), 509-530.
대한상공회의소 (2013. 05. 22). 한․미․일․독 기업의 채용시스템 비교와 시사점. http://www.korcham.net/Main/Best/CHO09102R.asp?m_CciId=B001&m_DataID=20120926728에서 2016. 05. 19 자료 얻음.
박용선, 이규만 (2011). 지방공무원의 개인특성과 직무특성이 경력몰입에 미치는 영향. 지방정부연구, 15(2), 35-50.
박원우, 김미숙, 정상명, 허규만 (2007). 동일방법편의(Common Method Bias)의 원인과 해결방안. 인사․조직연구, 15(1), 89-133.
신영숙 (2007). 이슈 리더십이 직무태도와 혁신행동에 미치는 영향: 심리적 임파워먼트의 매개효과, 사회구조적 특성 및 직종의 조절효과: 교육행정조직을 중심으로. 박사학위논문. 동양대학교.
심윤희, 유태용 (2009). 개인-직무 부합이 종업원의 직무열의에 미치는 영향: 의미성과 유능성의 매개효과를 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 22(3), 399-420.
양동민, 심덕섭 (2015). 직무요구 및 직무통제가 일-가정 갈등, 직무탈진 및 이직의도에 미치는 영향. 기업경영연구, 22(2), 87-108.
오인수, 김광현, Darnold, T. C., 황종오, 유태용, 박영아, 박량희 (2007). 직무만족, 조직몰입, 성과, 이직의도 간의 관련성: 문헌고찰 및 메타분석. 인사․조직연구, 15(4), 43-76.
유태용, 현희정 (2003). 개인과 조직성격간 부합, 개인과 직무특성간 부합이 조직과 직무에 대한 태도 및 행동에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지 산업 및 조직, 16(3), 201- 222.
이지영, 김진교 (2006). 온라인 패널 조사와 오프라인 대인면접 조사 간 데이터 품질 비교: 신뢰도와 타당도를 중심으로. 마케팅연구, 21(4), 209-231.
정유선, 박형인 (2015). 개인-직무 부합과 직무만족 및 이직의도 간 관계에 대한 메타분석. 한국 산업 및 조직심리학회 춘계학술대회, 182-183, 5월 16일. 서울: 서강대학교 다산관.
최명옥, 유태용 (2005). 개인-조직, 개인-직무, 개인-상사 부합이 조직몰입, 직무만족, 이직의도에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 18(1), 139-162.
캠퍼스잡앤조이 (2017. 02. 06). 2017년 공공기관 입사 시 필수, NCS란 무엇일까? http://www.jobnjoy.com/portal/jobnews/public_company_view.jsp?nidx=191342&depth1=1&depth2=1&depth3=3에서 2017. 03. 20 자료 얻음.
탁진국 (2007). 개인-직무 부합의 선행변인과 이직의도와의 관계: 신입사원을 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 20(4), 459-473.
허창구, 신강현 (2012). 개인-직무 부합과 직무탈진 및 직무열의 관계: LMX의 조절효과. 한국심리학회지 산업 및 조직, 25(3), 535- 556.
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.
Bakker, A. B., Hakanen, J. J., Demerouti, E., & Xanthopoulou, D. (2007). Job resources boost work engagement, particularly when job demands are high. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 274-284.
Cable, D. M., & DeRue, D. S. (2002). The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 875-884.
Cable, D. M., & Edwards, J. R. (2004). Complementary and supplementary fit: A theoretical and empirical integration. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 822-834.
Cammann, C., Fichman, M., Jenkins, G. D., & Klesh, J. R. (1979). The Michigan organizational assessment questionnaire. Unpublished manuscript, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Cammann, C., Fichman, M., Jenkins, G. D., Jr., & Klesh, J. R. (1983). Assessing the attitudes and perceptions of organizational members. In S. E. Seashore, E. E. Lawler, III, P. H. Mirvis, & C. Cammann (Eds.), Assessing organizational change: A guide to methods, measures, and practices (pp. 71-138). New York: John Wiley.
Campion, M. A., & Thayer, P. W. (1985). Development and field evaluation of an interdisciplinary measure of job design. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 29-43.
Caplan, R. D., Cobb, S., French, J. R. P., Jr., Harrison, R. V., & Pinneau, S. R., Jr. (1980). Job demands and worker health: Main effects and occupational differences. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.
Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1988). The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 13, 471-482.
Cotton, J. L., & Tuttle, J. M. (1986). Employee turnover: A meta-analysis and review with implications for research. Academy of Management Review, 11, 55-70.
Edwards, J. R. (1991). Person-job fit: A conceptual integration, literature review, and methodological critique. Oxford, England: John Wiley & Sons.
Edwards, J. R. (1994). The study of congruence in organizational behavior research: Critique and a proposed alternative. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 58, 51-100.
Edwards, J. R., Cable, D. M., Williamson, I. O., Lambert, L. S., & Shipp, A. J. (2006). The phenomenology of fit: Linking the person and environment to the subjective experience of person-environment fit. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 802-827.
Edwards, J. R., Caplan, R. D., & Harrison, R. V. (1998). Person-environment fit theory: Conceptual foundations, empirical evidence, and directions for future research. In C. L. Cooper (Ed.), Theories of organizational stress (pp. 28-67). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Edwards, J. R., & Harrison, R. V. (1993). Job demands and worker health: Three-dimensional reexamination of the relationship between person-environment fit and strain. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 628-648.
Edwards, J. R., & Parry, M. E. (1993). On the use of polynomial regression equations as an alternative to difference scores in organizational research. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 1577-1613.
Erdogan, B., & Bauer, T. N. (2009). Perceived overqualification and its outcomes: The moderating role of empowerment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 557-565.
Fine, S. (2007). Overqualification and Selection in Leadership. Training Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 14, 61-68.
French, J. R. P., Jr., Caplan, R. D., & Harrison, R. V. (1982). The mechanisms of job stress and strain. New York, NY: Wiley.
Feldman, D. C. (1996). The Nature, antecedents and consequences of underemployment. Journal of Management, 22, 385-407.
Harrison, R. V. (1978). Person-environment fit and job stress. In C. L. Cooper and R. Payne (Eds.), Stress at work (pp. 175-205). New York, NY: Wiley.
Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Johnson, W. R., Morrow, P. C., & Johnson, G. J. (2002). An evaluation of a perceived overqualification scale across work settings. The Journal of Psychology, 136, 425-441.
Kristof-Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals' fit at work: A meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group, and person-supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58, 281-342.
Luksyte, A., Spitzmueller, C., & Maynard, D. C. (2011). Why do overqualified incumbents deviate? Examining multiple mediators. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 16, 279-296.
Maxwell, S. E., & Delany, H. D. (1993). Bivariate median splits and spurious statistical significance. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 181-190.
Maynard, D. C., Joseph, T. A., & Maynard, A. M. (2006). Underemployment, job attitudes, and turnover intentions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 509-536.
Maynard, D. C., Brondolo, E. M., Connelly, C. E., & Sauer, C. E. (2015). I'm too good for this job: Narcissism's role in the experience of overqualification. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 64, 208-232.
Menon, S. (2001). Employee empowerment: An integrative psychological approach. Applied Psychology, 50, 153-180.
Morgeson, F. P., & Campion, M. A. (2002). Minimizing tradeoffs when redesigning work: Evidence from a longitudinal. Personnel Psychology, 55, 589-612.
Muchinsky, P. M., & Monahan, C. J. (1987). What is person-environment congruence? Supplementary versus complementary models of fit. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 31, 268-277.
Oh, I. S., Guay, R. P., Kim, K., Harold, C. M., Lee, J. H., Heo, C. G., & Shin, K. H. (2014). Fit happens globally: A meta‐analytic comparison of the relationships of person-environment fit dimensions with work attitudes and performance across east Asia, Europe, and North America. Personnel Psychology, 67, 99-152.
Park, H. I. (2016, August). Various effects of person-job fit: Content dimensions matter. Paper accepted at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Anaheim, CA.
Park, H. I., & Beehr, T. A. (2012). Person-Job Fit: Scale development for supplies-values fit and demands-abilities fit. Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, San Diego, CA.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879-903.
Shanock, L. R., Baran, B. E., Gentry, W. A., Pattison, S. C., & Heggestad, E. D. (2010). Polynomial regression with response surface analysis: A powerful approach for examining moderation and overcoming limitations of difference scores. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25, 543-554.
Shanock, L. R., Baran, B. E., Gentry, W. A., Pattison, S. C., & Heggestad, E. D. (2014). Erratum to: Polynomial regression with response surface analysis: A powerful approach for examining moderation and overcoming limitations of difference scores. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29, 161-161.
Schneider, B. (1987). The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 40, 437-453.
Seibert, S. E., Wang, G., & Courtright, S. H. (2011). Antecedents and consequences of psychological and team empowerment in organizations: a meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 981-1003.
Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1442-1465.
Spreitzer, G. M., Kizilos, M. A., & Nason, S. W. (1997). A dimensional analysis of the relationship between psychological empowerment and effectiveness satisfaction, and strain. Journal of Management, 23, 679-704.
Tett, R. P., & Meyer, J. P. (1993). Job satisfaction, Organizational commitment, Turnover Intention, and Turnover: Path analyses based on meta‐analytic findings. Personnel Psychology, 46, 259-293.
Thomas, K. W., & Velthouse, B. A. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: An “interpretive” model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of Management Review, 15, 666-681.
- Abstract viewed - 124 times
- PDF downloaded - 199 times
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© Korean Journal for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2017
Chonnam National University
Chonnam National University
How to Cite
Moderating effects of psychological empowerment on the relationships between person-job fit and turnover intention
심리적 임파워먼트의 조절효과
Vol 30 No 2 (2017): Korean Journal of Industrial and Organizational Psychology
Submitted: Apr 18, 2019
Published: May 31, 2017
This study investigated the moderating effects of psychological empowerment on the relationships between person-job (P-J) fit and turnover intention. P-J fit was measured using demands-abilities (D-A) fit on two job dimensions: social interaction and leadership. Psychological empowerment was assessed using four sub-types: meaning, competence, self-determination, and impact. First, we investigated whether mismatch between job demands and personal abilities would be related to increased turnover intention. We also examined whether psychological empowerment would mitigate these relationships. Data were collected from 415 full-time workers. The results from polynomial regressions showed that the relationships of D-A fit with turnover intention were different depending on the direction and the dimensions of misfit. The interaction between D-A fit and psychological empowerment was found as expected in seven out of eight cases in total, except for the interaction between D-A fit in social interaction and competence. These results imply that psychological empowerment, as a job resource, could ameliorate the negative impacts of P-J misfit on turnover intention.