Occupational drivers and ordinary people's mental models of Autonomous Vehicles
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study compared the differences in mental models of Autonomous Vehicles(AVs), which have recently received attention, by dividing them into ordinary people and occupational drivers. In Study 1, 16 psychological concepts(nodes) for car driving and AVs were extracted by interviewing ordinary people and occupational drivers. The connection relationship between the psychological concepts extracted for car driving in Study 2 and AVs in Study 3 was identified, and the differences in mental models between the two groups were compared. The relationship between concepts was analyzed through social network analysis. As a result of the study, there was a difference in the perceptions of car driving and AVs between ordinary people and occupational drivers. With respect to car driving, ordinary people recognized a direct relation with positive words such as relaxation, travel, family, and comfort, whereas occupational drivers recognized direct relation with occupations such as livelihood, accident, occupation, and labor. For AVs, ordinary people recognized a direct relation with only positive words such as freedom, leisure, and development, whereas professional drivers recognized not only positive words such as happiness, joy, and leisure but also nagative words such as anxiety, job loss, risk, crisis. This results show that ordinary people have more positive expectations for the changes that AVs will bring than occupational drivers. Whereas it can be said that occupational drivers have a more conservative attitude than ordinary people in accepting AVs, and show anxiety about job loss that AVs will bring. Based on the above results, the implications and limitations were discussed.
Metrics
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Funding data
-
National Research Foundation of Korea
Grant numbers NRF-2019S1A5A8037785 -
Ministry of Education
References
강소라 (2016). 자율주행자동차 법제도 현안 및 개선과제.
곽기영 (2014). 소셜 네트워크 분석. 서울: 청람.
국토교통부, 한국교통안전공단, 한국교통연구원 (2020). 자율주행자동차 윤리가이드 라인.
권주영, 주다영 (2018). 완전 자율주행 자동차의 실내공간 설계를 위한 문헌연구 기반의 실내행위 분석 및 유형화. 한국 HCI 학회 논문지, 13(2), 5-20.https://doi.org/10.17210/jhsk.2018.05.13.2.5
김규옥, 문영준, 조선아, 이종덕 (2016). 자율주행차 윤리 및 운전자수용성 기초연구. 교통연구원.
김규옥 (2019). 자율주행 대중교통 공공성 확보를 위한 쟁점과 개선방향. 방송과 미디어, 24(1), 73-83.
김민호, 박현지 (2020). 자율주행자동차의 윤리적 고찰과 법제정비 방안. 미국헌법연구, 31(1), 1-36.
김용학 김영진 (2016). 사회연결망 분석 (4 판). 서울: 박영사.
김용학 (2007). 사회연결망 분석. 서울: 박영사.
김정호 (2022. 5. 6). 교통지옥이 된 제주 ‘자율주행 공유차량이 등장한다면’. 제주의소리.
김해연, 성동규 (2018). 자율주행자동차 구매의도에 미치는 영향요인 연구. 한국콘텐츠학회논문지, 18, 81-100.
김효실 (2018. 10. 4). 택시업계 “카풀 안 접으면 카카오콜 안 받겠다”. 한겨레.
노승원, 노창균, 문병섭, 하정아 (2022). 실시간 수요대응 자율주행 모빌리티 평가 항목 정의. 한국산학기술학회논문지, 23(1),https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2022.23.1.871
류 정 (2022. 3. 28). 강남 한복판에서 시가 없는 자율 주행 택시 타볼 수 있다. 조선일보.
박지영, 우승국, 이동윤 (2018). 자율주행자동차 도입의 파급효과와 대응전략. 한국교통연구원 기본연구보고서, 1-200.
변순용, 황기연, 임이정 (2018). 자율주행자동차에 대한 한국형 윤리 가이드라인 연구. 윤리연구, 1(123), 203-239.https://doi.org/10.15801/je.1.132.201812.203
변순용 (2017). 자율주행자동차의 윤리적 가이드라인에 대한 시론. 윤리연구, 1(112), 199-216.https://doi.org/10.15801/je.1.112.201703.199
유정훈 (2019). [특집 1] 자율주행 택시는 기대해도 되는가?. 월간교통, 6-9.
이대국, 전민재, 김민성, 김이강, 조충호 (2022). On-demand 자율주행 서비스를 위한 세종시 대중교통 음영지역에 대한 분석. 한국통신학회 학술대회논문집, 922-923.
이미영 (2003). 인터넷 쇼핑 시장의 구조화에 관한 연구. 연세대학교 대학원 석사학위 논문.
이상돈, 정채연 (2017). 자율주행자동차의 윤리화의 과제와 전망. IT와 법 연구, 15, 281-325.https://doi.org/10.37877/itnlaw.2017.08.15.9
이성희, 유소영, 김성신, 김은지, 강남우 (2019). 사용자 경험 데이터 주도의 자율주행 택시 기술 수용성 분석. 대한기계학회 춘추학술대회, 2272-2272.
이지인, 임채린, 김나은, 김진우 (2016). 근거 이론을 적용한 자율주행 자동차 환경에서의 운전자 경험 연구. 한국 HCI 학회 학술대회, 178-185.https://doi.org/10.17210/hcik.2016.01.178
이혜원, & 정은경. (2021). 자율주행 자동차 사고 상황에 대한 한국인의 윤리적 판단. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 40(1),https://doi.org/105-129.10.22257/kjp.2021.3.40.1.105
전성준, 이상진, 김진우 (2016). 자율 주행 자동차에서 대화형 에이전트의 물리적 실재 디자인에 대한 연구. 한국 HCI 학회 학술대회, 343-344.
정민호, 고수윤 (2020). 자율주행 상용화를 위한 법제도 방향성 검토. 법학연구, 23(2), 105-128.https://doi.org/10.22789/IHLR.2020.06.23.2.105
정은경 (2016). 코칭에 대한 일반인과 코칭전문가의 인식: 상담에 대한 인식과의 비교. 사회과학연구, 55(2), 357-379.https://doi.org/10.22418/JSS.2016.12.55.2.357
조선아, 김규옥 (2020). 자율주행차의 사회적 수용성에 영향을 미치는 사회․경제적 요인. 교통연구, 51-64.https://doi.org/10.34143/jtr.2020.27.3.51
조수연 (2016. 9. 26). 잇따른 자율주행차 사고···구글, 스위스 무인버스도. 이코노믹 리뷰.
조지선, 이주, 홍아성, 손영우 (2013). 이상적 공인에 대한 기대와 공인에 대한 실제 평가: 정치인과 연예인에 대한 인지적 표상을 중심으로. 감성과학, 16(2), 249-264.
통계청 (2021). 2020년 운수업조사 결과(물류산업통계 포함).
한국자동차연구원 (2021). 자율주행 ‘레벨3’ 상용화를 위한 규제대응 현황.
한국정보화진흥원 (2018). 자율주행, 자동차산업의 빗장을 열다.
황신웅 (2005). 모바일 기기 구매 의사결정에 관한 멘탈 모델의 추출. 연세대학교 대학원 박사학위 논문.
황현규 (2022. 4. 10). “6시간 차에 있어야 했어요”…‘그린카’ 앱 먹통. KBS.
Buckley, L, Kaye, S. A., & Pradhan, A. K. (2018). Psychosocial factors associated with intended use of automated vehicles: A simulated driving study. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 115, 202-208.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2018.03.021
Burt, R. S. (1982). Toward a structural theory of action (Vol. 10). New York: Academic Press.
Cohen, T., Stilgoe, J., Stares, S., Akyelken, N., Cavoli, C., Day, J., ... & Wigley, E. (2020). A constructive role for social science in the development of automated vehicles. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 6, 100133.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2020.100133
Cooke, N. M., Durso, F. T., & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1986). Recall and measures of memory organization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12(4), 538.https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.12.4.538
Daly, A., (2017). Privacy in automation: an appraisal of the emerging Australian approach. Comput. Law Secur. Rep. 33(6), 836-846.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2017.05.009
Fagnant, D. J., & Kockelman, K. (2015). Preparing a nation for autonomous vehicles: opportunities, barriers and policy recommendations. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 77, 167-181.
Fagnant, D. J., & Kockelman, K. M. (2014). The travel and environmental implications of shared autonomous vehicles, using agent-based model scenarios. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 40, 1-13.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.04.003
Ford M (2015) Rise of the Robots: Technology and the Threat of a Jobless Future. New York: Basic Books. https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501719868
Fraedrich, E., Heinrichs, D., Bahamonde-Birke, F.J., Cyganski, R., (2019). Autonomous driving, the built environment and policy implications. Transport. Res. Pol. Pract. 122, 162-172.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.02.018
Gafert, M., Mirnig, A. G., Fröhlich, P., & Tscheligi, M. (2022, April). Tele Operation Station: XR-Exploration of User Interfaces for Remote Automated Vehicle Operation. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts (pp. 1-4).https://doi.org/10.1145/3491101.3519882
Gkartzonikas, C., & Gkritza, K. (2019). What have we learned? A review of stated preference and choice studies on autonomous vehicles. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 98, 323-337.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2018.12.003
Greenblatt, J. B., & Saxena, S. (2015). Autonomous taxis could greatly reduce greenhouse-gas emissions of US light-duty vehicles. Nature Climate Change, 5(9), 860-863. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2685
Hensher, D.A., (2018). Tackling road congestion - what might it look like in the future under a collaborative and connected mobility model? Transport Pol. 66, A1-A8.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.02.007
Holländer, K. (2022). Digitizing human-to-human interaction for automated vehicles [Unpubliched doctoral dissertation].
Kaye, S. A., Somoray, K., Rodwell, D., & Lewis, I. (2021). Users’ acceptance of private automated vehicles: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of safety research, 79, 352-367.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2021.10.002
Kőnig, M., & Neumayr, L. (2017). Users’ resistance towards radical innovations: The case of the self-driving car. Transportation Research Part F, 44, 42-52.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2016.10.013
Kun, A. L. (2018). Human-machine interaction for vehicles: Review and outlook. Foundations and Trends® in Human–Computer Interaction, 11(4), 201-293. http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/1100000069
Kun, A. L., Boll, S., & Schmidt, A. (2016). Shifting gears: User interfaces in the age of autonomous driving. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 15(1), 32-38.https://doi.org/10.1109/MPRV.2016.14
Liljamo, T., Liimatainen, H., & Pöllänen, M. (2018). Attitudes and concerns on automated vehicles. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 59, 24-44.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.08.010
Lipson H and Kurman M (2016) Driverless: Intelligent Cars and the Road Ahead. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Milakis, D., Van Arem, B., & Van Wee, B. (2017). Policy and society related implications of automated driving: A review of literature and directions for future research. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, 21(4), 324-348. https://doi.org/10.1080/15472450.2017.1291351
Millard-Ball, A. (2018). Pedestrians, autonomous vehicles, and cities. Journal of planning education and research, 38(1), 6-12.https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X16675674
Mindell D (2015) Our Robots, Ourselves: Robotics and the Myths of Autonomy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Mizruchi, M. S. (1992). The Stucture of Corporate Political Action. Harvard University Press.
Pettigrew, S., Cronin, S. L., Norman, R., 2018a. The unrealized potential of autonomous vehicles for an aging population. J. Aging Soc. Policy.https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2018.1500860
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78.https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
SAE (2016) Taxonomy and defnitions for terms related to driving automation systems for on-road motor vehicles (Surface Vehicle Recommended Practice: Superseding J3016 Jan 2014), SAE International, September 2016.
Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Strayer, D. L., Yu, Z., Biondi, F., & Cooper, J. M. (2018). Cognitive underpinnings of beliefs and confidence in beliefs about fully automated vehicles. Transportation Research Part F, 55, 114-211; 122.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.02.029
Taeihagh, A., Lim, H.S.M., (2019). Governing autonomous vehicles: emerging responses for safety, liability, privacy, cybersecurity, and industry risks. Transport Rev. 39, 103-128. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2018.1494640
Xu, Z., Zhang, K., Min, H., Wang, Z., Zhao, X., & Liu, P. (2018). What drives people to accept automated vehicles? Findings from a field experiment. Transportation research part C: emerging technologies, 95, 320-334.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2018.07.024
Yang, J., & Coughlin, J. F. (2014). In-vehicle technology for self-driving cars: Advantages and challenges for aging drivers. International Journal of Automotive Technology, 15(2), 333-340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-014-0034-6
Zhang, T. Tao, D, Qu, X., Zhang, X, Lin, R, & Zhang, W. (2019). The roles of initial trust and perceived risk in public’s acceptance of automated vehicles. Transportation Research Part C, 98, 207-220.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2018.11.018