Evaluation of the three-component model of organizational commitment in South Korea Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling(ESEM) approach

Main Article Content

Jungwon Ahn
Soonmook Lee

Abstract

Allen and Meyer's(1990) 3-component model of organizational commitment(OC) was investigated using exploratory structural equation modeling(ESEM) with samples of full-time social workers at social welfare organizations in South Korea. Confirmatory factor analysis(CFA) has been at the heart of testing factor structure of the 3-component model in organizational commitment research wherein each scale of the affective, continuance, and normative commitment is reported to measure conceptually and empirically separable construct. The present study applied ESEM, specifically ‘intra-scale’ and ‘inter-scale’ ESEM, to scrutinize factor structure of the 3-component scales. ESEM methodology uses exploratory approach in that all cross-loadings are estimated between each measure and factors, with uniqueness correlated according to the researcher's hypotheses as in CFA. In this respect, ESEM can be viewed as an open approach to item analysis distinguished from the conventional (closed) approach, such as EFA and CFA. This study provided detailed assessment of the 3-component model through comparisons of factor structures estimated by EFA, CFA and ‘intra’ ESEM, followed by the ‘inter’ ESEM conducted on all other variables(assumed to be similar constructs with or antecedents of OC). As a result, the ‘intra-scale’ ESEM showed a substantially better fit and yielded more discriminated factors(less correlated) than did EFA and CFA that are models for planned scale. The ‘inter-scale’ ESEM revealed how seriously method effect can distort an original factor structure in empirical data measured together with multiple scales of other constructs. Using ESEM has advantages of estimating common factor structures, controlling for common method effect that are typically included in measures in applied research. Also, it allows for much more possibilities that each item can measure multiple constructs so as to reveal more realistic factor structures. Taken together, the present results suggest a need to conceptualize and validate a new scale for organizational commitment reflecting Korean culture.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...
 

Article Details

Section
Empirical Articles

References

김종규, 이순묵, 윤창영 (2015). 핵심자기평가의 내적 구조 검토: 탐색적 구조방정식 모형(ESEM)의 적용을 통한 선언척도와 실제 척도의 차이 검토. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 28(3), 355-384.
남궁준재, 이순묵, 김효선 (2013). 상황판단검사에서 시나리오 효과를 통제한 탐색적 요인분석. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 26(4), 599-624.
민선홍 (2014). 상황적 검사에 대한 탐색적 요인분석의 두 접근: 탐색적 구조방정식 모형과 다중검사 요인분석모형의 비교. 성균관대 석사학위 논문.
유병주 (1982). 직무만족의 개념정의 및 측정에 관한 연구. 경상논집, 4(1), 45-67.
유현숙 (2004). 여성의 인적․사회적․심리적 자본에 대한 실증연구. 대전대학교 대학원 박사학위 논문.
이수진 (1994). 사회복지사의 직무만족에 관한 연구. 미간행 이화여자대학교 사회복지대학원 석사학위 논문.
이순묵 (1995). 요인분석 I. 서울: 학지사.
이회영 (2012). 심리적 자본과 조직공정성이 직무만족과 조직몰입에 미치는 영향. 성균관대 석사학위 논문.
최소연 (2005). 조직공정성이 사회복지사의 조직시민행동에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구. 한국사회복지학, 57(3), 389-413.
최수미, 조영일 (2013). 부정문항이 포함된 척도의 요인구조 및 방법효과 검증과 남녀 간의 차이 비교: Rosenberg 자기존중감 척도를 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 32(3), 571-589.
홍세희, 노언경, 정 송 (2011). 부정문항이 포함된 검사의 요인구조: 자아존중감 검사의 예. 교육평가연구, 24(3), 713-732.
Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(1), 1-18.
Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1996). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: An examination of construct validity. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 49(3), 252-276.
Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16(3), 397-438.
Becker, H. S. (1960). Notes on the concept of commitment. American Journal of Sociology, 32-40.
Bergman, M. E. (2006). The relationship between affective and normative commitment: review and research agenda. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(5), 645-663.
Bovaird, J. A., & Koziol, N. A. (2012). Measurement models for ordered-categorical indicators. Handbook of structural equation modeling, 495-511.
Brown, S. P. (1996). A meta-analysis and review of organizational research on job involvement. Psychological Bulletin, 120(2), 235.
Browne, M. W. (2001). An overview of analytic rotation in exploratory factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36(1), 111- 150.
Buchanan, B. (1974). Building organizational commitment: The socialization of managers in work organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 533-546.
Casper, W. J., Harris, C., Taylor-Bianco, A., & Wayne, J. H. (2011). Work-family conflict, perceived supervisor support and organizational commitment among Brazilian professionals. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79(3), 640-652.
Cohen, A. (2003). Multiple commitments in the workplace: An integrative approach. Psychology Press.
De Gieter, S., Hofmans, J., & Pepermans, R. (2011). Revisiting the impact of job satisfaction and organizational commitment on nurse turnover intention: an individual differences analysis. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 48(12), 1562-1569.
Dunham, R. B., Grube, J. A., & Castaneda, M. B. (1994). Organizational commitment: The utility of an integrative definition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(3), 370.
Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College ublishers.
Ehrhardt, K., Miller, J. S., Freeman, S. J., & Hom, P. W. (2011). An examination of the relationship between training comprehensiveness and organizational commitment: Further exploration of training perceptions and employee attitudes. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 22(4), 459-489.
Fu, W., Deshpande, S. P., & Zhao, X. (2011). The impact of ethical behavior and facets of job satisfaction on organizational commitment of Chinese employees. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(4), 537-543.
Gellatly, I. R. (1995). Individual and group determinants of employee absenteeism: Test of a causal model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16(5), 469-485.
Hackett, R. D., Bycio, P., & Hausdorf, P. A. (1994). Further assessments of Meyer and Allen's (1991) three-component model of organizational commitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(1), 15.
Hofstede, G. (1980a). Motivation, leadership, and organization: do American theories apply abroad?. Organizational Dynamics, 9(1), 42-63.
Hom, P. W., Katerberg, R., & Hulin, C. L. (1979). Comparative examination of three approaches to the prediction of turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64(3), 280.
Jaros, S. J. (1997). An assessment of Meyer and Allen's (1991) three-component model of organizational commitment and turnover intentions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 51(3), 319-337.
Jaros, S. (2007). Meyer and Allen model of organizational commitment: Measurement issues. ICFAI Journal of Organizational Behavior, 6(4), 7-25.
Jöreskog, K. G. (1971). Statistical analysis of sets of congeneric tests. Psychometrika, 36(2), 109- 133.
Kanter, R. M. (1968). Commitment and social organization: A study of commitment mechanisms in utopian communities. American Sociological Review, 499-517.
Kidron, A. (1978). Work values and organizational commitment. Academy of Management Journal, 21(2), 239-247.
Ko, J. W., Price, J. L., & Mueller, C. W. (1997). Assessment of Meyer and Allen's three-component model of organizational commitment in South Korea. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(6), 961.
Lee, J. A., & Yang, C. (2005). Factor structure of organizational commitment: Differences between US and South Korean samples 1, 2, 3. Psychological Reports, 96(3), 595-602.
Lee, K., Allen, N. J., Meyer, J. P., & Rhee, K. Y. (2001). The Three‐Component Model of Organizational Commitment: An Application to South Korea. Applied Psychology, 50(4), 596-614.
Luthans, F., Avolio, B. J., Avery, J. B., & Norman, S. M. (2007). Psychological capital measurement and relationship with performance and satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 60(3), 541-572.
Magazine, S. L., Williams, L. J., & Williams, M. L. (1996). A confirmatory factor analysis examination of reverse coding effects in Meyer and Allen's affective and continuance commitment scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56(2), 241-250.
Marsh, H. W., Muthen, B., Asparouhov, T., Ludtke, O., Robitzsch, A., Morin, A. J. S., & Trautwein, U. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling, integrating CFA and EFA: Application to students’ evaluations of university teaching. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 439-476.
Mathieu, J. E., & Zajac, D. M. (1990). A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment. Psychological Bulletin, 108(2), 171.
McGee, G. W., & Ford, R. C. (1987). Two (or more?) dimensions of organizational commitment: Reexamination of the affective and continuance commitment scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72(4), 638.
Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1987a). A longitudinal analysis of the early development and consequences of organizational commitment. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue Canadienne des Sciences du Comportement, 19(2), 199.
Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61-89.
Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1997). Commitment in the workplace: Theory, research, and application. Sage.
Meyer, J. P., Becker, T. E., & Vandenberghe, C. (2004). Employee commitment and motivation: a conceptual analysis and integrative model. Journal of applied psychology, 89(6), 991.
Meyer, J. P., & Herscovitch, L. (2001). Commitment in the workplace: Toward a general model. Human Resource Management Review, 11(3), 299-326.
Meyer, J. P., & Maltin, E. R. (2010). Employee commitment and well-being: A critical review, theoretical framework and research agenda. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 77(2), 323-337.
Meyer, J. P., & Smith, C. A. (2000). HRM practices and organizational commitment: Test of a mediation model. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de L'administration, 17(4), 319-331.
Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J., & Smith, C. A. (1993). Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 538.
Meyer, J. P., Paunonen, S. V., Gellatly, I. R., Goffin, R. D., & Jackson, D. N. (1989). Organizational commitment and job performance: It's the nature of the commitment that counts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(1), 152.
Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D. J., Herscovitch, L., & Topolnytsky, L. (2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of vocational behavior, 61(1), 20-52.
Meyer, J. P., Stanley, L. J., & Parfyonova, N. M. (2012). Employee commitment in context: The nature and implication of commitment profiles. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(1), 1-16.
Moorman, R. H. (1991). Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship?. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(6), 845.
Moorman, R. H., Niehoff, B. P., & Organ, D. W. (1993). Treating employees fairly and organizational citizenship behavior: Sorting the effects of job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and procedural justice. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 6(3), 209- 225.
Mowday, R. T. (1999). Reflections on the study and relevance of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 8(4), 387- 401.
Mowday, R. T., Porter, L. W., & Steers, R. M. (1982). Employee-organization linkages: The psychology of commitment, absenteeism, and turnover (Vol. 153). New York: Academic Press.
Mowday, R. T., Steers, R. M., & Porter, L. W. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14(2), 224-247.
Muthén, L. K. and Muthén, B. O. (2010). Mplus User’s Guide. Sixth Edition. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
Napior, D. (1972). Nonmetric multidimensional techniques for summated ratings. Multidimensional Scaling, 1, 157-178.
Nie, Norman, Dale Bent & C. Hadlai Hull. (2009). PASW Statistics 18 Brief Guide.
Niehoff, B. P., & Moorman, R. H. (1993). Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 36(3), 527-556.
Robbins, T. L., Summers, T. P., Miller, J. L., & Hendrix, W. H. (2000). Short Research Note: Using the group‐value model to explain the role of noninstrumental justice in distinguishing the effects of distributive and procedural justice. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(4), 511-518.
Rummel, R. J. (1970). Applied factor analysis. Northwestern University Press.
Salancik, G. R. (1977). Commitment and the control of organizational behavior and belief. New Directions in Organizational Behavior, 1-54.
Smith, P. C., Kendall, L. M., & Hulin, C. L. (1969). The measurement of satisfaction in work and retirement.
Solinger, O. N., Van Olffen, W., & Roe, R. A. (2008). Beyond the three-component model of organizational commitment. Journal of applied psychology, 93(1), 70.
Somers, M. J. (1995). Organizational commitment, turnover and absenteeism: An examination of direct and interaction effects. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16(1), 49-58.
Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism & collectivism. Westview Press.
Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4-70.
Vandenberg, R. J., & Self, R. M. (1993). Assessing newcomers' changing commitments to the organization during the first 6 months of work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 557.
Wasti, S. A. (1999). Organizational commitment in a collectivist culture: The case of Turkey (Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign).
Wiener, Y., & Vardi, Y. (1980). Relationships between job, organization, and career commitments and work outcomes-An integrative approach. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 26(1), 81-96.
Wiener, Y. (1982). Commitment in organizations: A normative view. Academy of Management Review, 7(3), 418-428.

Most read articles by the same author(s)