Analysis of the factor structure of Core Self-Evaluations through exploratory structural equation modeling 탐색적 구조방정식 모형(ESEM)의 적용을 통한 선언척도와 실제척도의 차이 검토
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study was conducted to investigate the factor structure of Core Self-Evaluations(CSE) by means of exploratory structural equation modeling(ESEM) models. ESEM is a technique that has been proposed for the analysis of internal structure that overcomes some of the limitations of EFA and CFA. The results show that factor structures of CSE consist of one factor. Typically, the one- or two- factor structure is supported by previous studies. The reason for discrepancies is as follows. First, the 12 Core Self-Evaluations Scale(CSES) items have the potential to be an indicator of other similar constructs because the items cut across the four core traits such that some items may reflect a combination of two or more of the core traits. Second, the relationship between the various traits that may be the concept of CSE have not been fully investigated. Therefore, CSE construct should be clarified in the logical structure of the CSE theory and the development of the scale with the more sophisticated internal structure are required.
Metrics
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
박순옥 (1989). 검사제작을 위한 정보함수와 상대적 효율성의 응용연구. 교육평가연구 3(1), 147-181.
박정수 (1992). 문항반응이론에서 일차원성에 관한 통게적 가설 검정. 한국교육, 19, 73-87.
성태제 (1991). 문항반응이론 입문. 양서원
성태제 (2005). 교육 평가. 학지사 DOI: https://doi.org/10.34225/jidc.2005.4.24
성태제 및 김경희 (1993). 문항수, 문항난이도, 문항변별도 변화에 따른 신뢰도 계수와 검사정보함수의 변화. 교육평가연구, 6(2), 123-154.
이순묵 (1995). 요인분석 I. 서울: 학지사.
이종구, 이순묵 (1991). SAS의 이해와 활용. 성원사
안창규 (1990). 검사의 신뢰도를 높이기 위한 문항선정 기준에 관한 연구. 부산대학교 학생 생활연구보, 25, 95-167
정 송, 이순묵, 이영선 및 이민수 (2011). MMPI 단축형 우울척도 개발: 문항기반 요인분석의 사용. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 30(3), 811-830
한윤영 (2013). 문항반응이론을 적용한 한국형 재구조화연함검사(K-RAT)의 문항탐색. 영재와 영재교육, 12(2), 93-113.
황정규 (1989). 학습과 교육평가. 교육과학사
Adams, J. S. (1963). Toward an understanding of inequity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 76, 422-436. doi:10.1037/h0040968 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040968
Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 267-299. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60108-2
Agho, A. O., Price, J. L., & Mueller, C. W. (1992). Discriminant validity of measure of job satisfaction, positive affectivity and negative. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 65, 185-196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1992.tb00496.x
Akan, O. H., Allen, R. S., & White, C. S. (2009). Equity Sensitivity and Organizational Citizenship behavior in a team environment. Small Group Research, 40, 94-112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496408326575
Allen, R., S., Takeda, M., & White, C. S. (2005). Cross-cultural equity sensitivity: A test of differences between the United States and Japan. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 20, 641-662. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940510631426
Baker, F. B. (1992). Item Response Theory: Parameter estimation technique. NY: Marcel Dekker.
Birnbaum, A. (1968). Some latent trait models and their use in inferring an examinee’s ability. In F. M. Lord & M. R. Novick (Eds.), Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading MA: Addison-Wesley.
Blakely, G. L., Andrews, M. C., & Moorman, R. H. (2005). The moderating effects of equity sensitivity on the relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Business and Psychology, 20, 259-273. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-005-8263-3
Buelens, M. & Poelmans, S. A. Y. (2004). Enriching the Spence and Robbins’ typology of workaholism: Demographic, motivational and organizational correlates. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 17, 440-458. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09534810410554470
Carmines, E. G., & Zeller, R. A. (1979). Reliability and validity assessment. Beverly Hills CA: Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412985642
Cohen, P. Y., & P. M. Popovich (2002). Correlation: Parametric and nnparametric measures. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412983808
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychoetrika, 16, 297-234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Erlabum.
Foote, S. D., & Harmon, H. (2006). Measuring equity sensitivity, Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol. (21), 90-108.
Green, S. B., Lissitz, R. W., & Mulaik, S. A. (1977). Limitation of coeffcient alpha as an index of test unidimensionality. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 37, 827-838. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447703700403
Greenberg, J. (1979). Protestant ethic endorsement and the fairness of equity inputs. Journal of Research in Personality, 13, 81-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(79)90043-6
Hambleton, R. K., & Swaminathan, H. (1985). Item response theory: Principles and application. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1988-9
Heneman, H. G. & Schwab, D. P. (1985). Pay satisfaction: Its multidimensional nature and measurement. International Journal of Psychology, 20, 129-142.
Huseman, R. C., Hatfield, J. D., & Miles, E. W. (1985). Test for individual perceptions of job equity: Some preliminary findings. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 61, 1055-1064. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1985.61.3f.1055
Huseman, R. C., Hatfield, J. D., & Miles, E. W. (1987). A new perspective on equity theory: The equity sensitivity construct. Academy of Management Review, 12(2), 222-234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1987.4307799
Kickul, J. & Lester, S. W. (2001). Broken promises: Equity sensitivity as a moderator between psychological contract breach and employee attitudes and behavior. Journal of Business and Psychology, 16, 191-217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011105132252
Kickul, J., Gundry, L. K., & Posig, M. (2005). Does trust matter? The relationship between equity sensitivity and perceived equity sensitivity and perceived organizational justice. Journal of Business Ethics, 56, 205-218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-004-0992-0
King, W. C., & Miles, E. W. (1994). The measurement of equity sensitivity. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 67, 133-142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1994.tb00556.x
King, W. C., Miles, E. W., & Day, D. D. (1993). A test and refinement of the equity sensitivity construct. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14, 301-317. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030140403
Lee, K., Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (2001). The three-component model of organisational commitment: An application to South Korea. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 50(4), 596-614. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00075
Lord, F. M. (1980). Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. NY: Erlbaum Associates.
Miles, E. W., Hatfield, J. D., & Huseman, R. C., (1994). Equity sensitivity and outcome importance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 585-596. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030150704
Miner, J. B. (1980). Theories of organizational behavior. Hinsdale, IL: Dryden Press
Mowday, R. T. (1983). Equity theory predictions of behavior in organizations. In R. M. Steers & L Porter(Eds), Motivation and work behavior (3rd. ed, pp. 91-113). NY: McGraw-Hill.
Mudrack, P. E., Mason, E. S., Stepanski, K. M. (1999). Equity sensitivity and business ethics. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72, 539-560. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1348/096317999166833
O’Neill, B. S. & Mone, M. A. (1998). Investigating equity sensitivity as a moderator of relations between self-efficacy and workplace attitudes, Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 805-816. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.83.5.805
Park, H-S, Dailey, R., & Lemus, D. (2002). The use of exploratory factor analysis and principal components analysis in comunication research. Human Communication Research, 28, 562-577. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00824.x
Patrick, S. L., & Jackson, J. J. (1991). Further examination of the equity sensitivity construct. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 73, 1091-1106.
Raja, U., Johns, G., & Ntalianis, F. (2004). The impact of personality on psychological contracts. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 350-367.
Reckase, M. D. (1979). Unifactor latent trait models applied to multifactor tests: Results and implication. Journal of Educational Statistics, 4(3), 207-230. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986004003207
Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika Monograph, No. 17 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03372160
Sauley, K. S., & Bedeian, A. G. (2000). Equity sensitivity: Construction of a measure and examination of its psychometric properties. Journal of Management, 26(5), 855-910. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600507
Shore, T. H., & Straus, J. (2008). Measurement of equity sensitivity: A comparison of the equity sensitivity instrument and equity preference questionnaire. Psychological Report, 102, 64-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.102.1.64-78
Wheeler, K. G. (2007). Empirical comparison of equity preference questionnaire and equity sensitivity instrument in relation to work outcome preferences. Psychological Reports, 100, 955-962. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.100.3.955-962
Mellenbergh, G. J. (1994). A unidimensioinal latent trait model for continuous item responses. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 29, 223-237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2903_2
Ferrando, P. J. (1996). Calibration of invariant item parameters in a continuous item response model using the extended LISREL measurement submodel. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 31, 419-439. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3104_2