The effect of personality diversity on life satisfaction and job performance The mediate effect of mastery approach goal orientation

Main Article Content

ChiHun Park
YoungSeok Park

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to verify the effect of personality diversity on well-being in life and job performance. Personality diversity is a hypothetical construct for this study based on self-concept differentiation across roles, considering both the variability between roles and the variability within a role in personality. Personality diversity is the variety of subject-specific personality, which refers to a variety of distinctive personality that are expressed according to the role. To this end, it is examined how personality diversity relates to life satisfaction and job performance. After that, the process is explained through a mediated model by achievement goals. As a result, personality diversity showed negative relationship with life satisfaction. This result reconfirmed the previous studies. However, personality diversity had positive correlations with task performance, context performance, and adaptational performance. And even after controlling the level of personality, personality diversity showed significant incremental validity for task performance. In addition, the mastery approach goal orientation showed partial mediation effect between the personality diversity and task performance and full mediation effect between the personality diversity and the other criterion variables, contextual and adaptational performance. These results suggest that personality diversity is distinguished from the level of personality and can have adaptive effect on job performance rather than supporting the self-fragmentation hypothesis of prior researches. Finally, the need of reliability test for personality diversity and further research was suggested.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
Park, C., & Park, Y. (2021). The effect of personality diversity on life satisfaction and job performance: The mediate effect of mastery approach goal orientation. Korean Journal of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 34(2), 287–318. https://doi.org/10.24230/kjiop.v34i2.287-318
Section
Empirical Articles

References

Baird, B. M., Le, K., & Lucas, R. E. (2006). On the nature of intraindividual personality variability: Reliability, validity, and associations with well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(3), 512-527.https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.3.512

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173

Befort, N., & Hattrup, K. (2003). Valuing task and contextual performance: Experience, job roles, and ratings of the importance of job behaviors. Applied HRM Research, 8(1), 17-32. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.471.9915&rep=rep1&type=pdf

Bleidorn, W., & Ködding, C. (2013). The divided self and psychological (mal) adjustment - A meta-analytic review. Journal of Research in Personality, 47(5), 547-552.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2013.04.009

Block, J. (1961). Ego identity, role variability, and adjustment. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 25(5), 392-397.https://doi.org/10.1037/h0042979

Chang, J. Y., Cook, A. L., & Payne, S. C. (2013). Temporal dynamics of emotions within a workday: the moderating effect of neuroticism. Korean Journal of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 26(2), 219-243.https://doi.org/10.24230/kjiop.v26i2.219-243

Charbonnier-Voirin, A., El Akremi, A., & Vandenberghe, C. (2010). A multilevel model of transformational leadership and adaptive performance and the moderating role of climate for innovation. Group & Organization Management, 35(6), 699-726.https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601110390833

Church, A. T., Katigbak, M. S., Reyes, J. A. S., Salanga, M. G. C., Miramontes, L. A., & Adams, N. B. (2008). Prediction and cross-situational consistency of daily behavior across cultures: Testing trait and cultural psychology perspectives. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(5), 1199-1215.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2008.03.007

Churchyard, J. (2014). Within-person variation in personality and psychological well-being. Doctoral Dissertation. In: ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.

Clifton, A., & Kuper, L. E. (2011). Self‐reported personality variability across the social network is associated with interpersonal dysfunction. Journal of Personality, 79(2), 359-390.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00686.x

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behaviors science.(2nd). NJ: Laurence Erlbaum Associates. ISBN: 0-8058-0283-5

Debusscher, J., Hofmans, J., & De Fruyt, F. (2016). Do personality states predict momentary task performance? The moderating role of personality variability. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 89(2), 330-351. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12126

Deshon, R. P., & Gillespie, J. Z. (2005). A motivated action theory account of goal orientation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1096-1127.https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1096

Diehl, M., & Hay, E. L. (2007). Contextualized self‐representations in adulthood. Journal of Personality, 75(6), 1255-1284.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2007.00475.x

Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of personality assessment, 49(1), 71-75.https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13

Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., & Scollon, N. C. (2006). Beyond the hedonic treadmill: revising the adaptation theory of well-being. American Psychologist, 61(4), 305-314.https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.61.4.305

Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D. W., Oishi, S., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2010). New well-being measures: short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 97(2), 143-156.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9493-y

Donahue, E. M., Robins, R. W., Roberts, B. W., & John, O. P. (1993). The divided self: Concurrent and longitudinal effects of psychological adjustment and social roles on self-concept differentiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(5), 834.https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.64.5.834

Dweck, C. S. (1996). Capturing the dynamic nature of personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 30(3), 348-362.https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1996.0024

Eid, M., & Diener, E. (1999). Intraindividual variability in affect: reliability, validity, and personality correlates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(4), 662-676.https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.4.662

Elliot, A. J., & Church, M. A. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(1), 218-232.https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.218

Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2 × 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 501-519. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.3.501

Fleeson, W. (2001). Toward a structure-and process-integrated view of personality: Traits as density distributions of states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(6), 1011-1027.https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.6.1011

Fleeson, W. (2007). Situation‐based contingencies underlying trait‐content manifestation in behavior. Journal of Personality, 75(4), 825-862.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2007.00458.x.

Fleeson, W., & Gallagher, P. (2009). The implications of big five standing for the distribution of trait manifestation in behavior: fifteen experience-sampling studies and a meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 1097-1114.https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016786

Fleeson, W., & Wilt, J. (2010). The relevance of big five trait content in behavior to subjective authenticity: do high levels of within‐person behavioral variability undermine or enable authenticity achievement? Journal of Personality, 78(4), 1353-1382.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2007.00458.x

Funder, D. C. (2009). Persons, behaviors and situations: An agenda for personality psychology in the postwar era. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(2), 120-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2008.12.041

Geukes, K.. Nestler, S., Hutteman, R., Küfner, A., & Back, M. (2017). Trait Personality and State Variability: Predicting Individual Differences in Within- and Cross-Context Fluctuations in Affect, Self-Evaluations, and Behavior in Everyday Life. Journal of Research in Personality, 69, 124-138.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2016.06.003.

Gleitman, H. (2006). Basic Psychology, 4/e. (Jang, H. G., Ahn, S. H., Lee, J. H., Shin, h. J., Jung, B. K., Lee, K. O., & Do, K. S. Trans.). Seoul: Sigmapress. (Original work published in 1995). ISBN: 8990685540

Hayes, A. F. (2009). Beyond baron and kenny: statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76(4), 408-420.https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750903310360

Heller, D., Komar, J., & Lee, W. B. (2007). The Dynamics of personality states, goals, and well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 33(6), 898-910.https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207301010

Higgins, E. T. (2000). Does personality provide unique explanations for behaviour? personality as cross‐person variability in general principles. European Journal of Personality, 14(5), 391-406.https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-0984(200009/10)14:5<391::AID-PER394>3.0.CO

Hogan, R. (2007). Personality and the fate of organizations. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. ISBN: 0-8058-4143-1

Judge, T. A., Simon, L. S., Hurst, C., & Kelley, K. (2014). What I experienced yesterday is who I am today: Relationship of work motivations and behaviors to within-individual variation in the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(2), 199-221. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034485

Kanfer, R. (1990). Motivation theory and industrial and organizational psychology. In M. D. Dunnette and L. Hough(Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Volume 1. Theory in industrial and Organizational psychology (pp. 75-170). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

Kim, S., & Yoo, T. Y. (2010). The Influence of Self-Regulation Activities and Social Network in The Relationship between Individual Goal Orientation and Job Performance. Korean Journal of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 23(3), 525-550.http://www.dbpia.co.kr/journal/articleDetail?nodeId=NODE06370376

Kwon, S. M. (2017). Personality Psychology for Understanding Human Beings. Seoul: Hakjisa. ISBN: 9788999711213

Lachmann, B., Sariyska, R., Kannen, C., Błaszkiewicz, K., Trendafilov, B., Andone, I., . . . Montag, C. (2018). Contributing to overall life satisfaction: personality traits versus life satisfaction variables revisited-is replication impossible? Behavioral Sciences, 8(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs8010001

Lazarus, R. S. (1999). Stress and emotion: A new synthesis. NY: Springer Publishing Company. ISBN: 0-8261-1250-1

Lee, F. K., Sheldon, K. M., & Turban, D. B. (2003). Personality and the goal-striving process: the influence of achievement goal patterns, goal level, and mental focus on performance and enjoyment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(2), 256-265.https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.2.256

Lim, I. J., Kim, S. Y., & Park, H. J. (2004). statistical method (for education, psychology, and social research). Seoul: Hakhyunsa. ISBN: 8980602154

Lim, Y. J. (2012). Psychometric Properties of the Satisfaction with Life Scale among Korean Police Officers, University Students, and Adolescents. Korean Journal of Psychology: General, 31(3), 877-896.http://www.dbpia.co.kr/journal/articleDetail?nodeId=NODE06368283

Luhmann, M., Hofmann, W., Eid, M., & Lucas, R. E. (2012). Subjective well-being and adaptation to life events: a meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(3), 592-615.https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025948

McAdams, D. P. (2016). The person: an introduction to the science of personality psychology, 5th Edition. (Jung, S. H., Kim, S. Y., Park, K. E., & Hyun, C. S. Trans). Seoul: Sigmapress. (Original work published in 2009). ISBN: 9788968666643

McCrae, R. R., & Costa Jr, P. T. (1994). The stability of personality: observations and evaluations. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 3(6), 173-175.https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10770693

Mischel, W. (2004). Toward an integrative science of the person. Annual Review of Psychology, 55(1), 1-22.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.042902.130709

Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive- affective system theory of personality: reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological review, 102(2), 246-268. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.102.2.246

Motowidlo, S. J., & Van Scotter, J. R. (1994). Evidence that task performance should be distinguished from contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(4), 475-480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.79.4.475

Paulhus, D. L., & Martin, C. L. (1988). Functional flexibility: a new conception of interpersonal flexibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(1), 88-101.https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.55.1.88

Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). Review of the satisfaction with life scale. Psychological Assessment, 5(2), 164-172.https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.5.2.164

Payne, S. C., Youngcourt, S. S., & Beaubien, J. M. (2007). A meta-analytic examination of the goal orientation nomological net. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 128-150.https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.128

Pulakos, E. D., Arad, S., Donovan, M. A., & Plamondon, K. E. (2000). Adaptability in the workplace: development of a taxonomy of adaptive performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(4), 612-624.https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.4.612

Pulakos, E. D., Dorsey, D. W., & White, S. S. (2006). Adaptability in the workplace: selecting an adaptive workforce. In C. S. Burke, L. G. Pierce, & E. Salas (Eds.), Understanding Adaptability: A Prerequisite for Effective Performance within Complex Environments: Advances in human performance and cognitive engineering research, Vol. 6, (pp. 41-72). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1479-3601(05)06002-9

Reeve, J. (2018). Understanding motivation and emotion, 6th Edition. (Kim, A. Y., Do, S. E., Shin, T. S., Lee, W. G., Lee, E. J., & Jang, H. S. Trans.). Seoul: Pakhaksa. (Original work published in 2015). ISBN: 9788998521653

Rudolph, C. W., Lavigne, K. N., Katz, I. M., & Zacher, H. (2017). Linking dimensions of career adaptability to adaptation results: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 102, 151-173.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2017.06.003

Sheldon, K. M., Ryan, R. M., Rawsthorne, L. J., & Ilardi, B. (1997). Trait self and true self: cross-role variation in the big-five personality traits and its relations with psychological authenticity and subjective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(6), 1380-1393.https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.6.1380

Suh, E. M. (2002). Culture, identity consistency, and subjective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1378-1391. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1378

Sung, M. S, & Park, Y. S. (2005). Validity of 2×2 Achievement Goal Structure in Corporate Organizations. Korean Journal of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 18(1), 97-117. http://www.dbpia.co.kr/journal/articleDetail?nodeId=NODE06370216

van Daal, T., Donche, V., & De Maeyer, S. (2014). The impact of personality, goal orientation and self-efficacy on participation of high school teachers in learning activities in the workplace. Vocations and Learning, 7(1), 21-40.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-013-9105-5

Zweig, D., & Webster, J. (2004). What are we measuring? an examination of the relationships between the big-five personality traits, goal orientation, and performance intentions. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(7), 1693-1708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2003.07.010