The effectiveness of job embeddedness in turnover studies A meta-analysis
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The main objective of this study is to investigate the strength of the relationship among job embeddedness, organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover intentions among Korean employees using meta-analytic methods with theoretical rationale. The results from meta-analysis of 44 Korean studies are as follows. First, the true-score correlations among on-the-job embeddedness, fit to organization, organization-related sacrifice, and turnover intention are -.569, -.462, -.414 each (k = 14-30, N = 4657-8299); the 95% CIs and 80% CVs for all relationships had no zero. Second, the true-score correlations among on-the-job embeddedness, three sub-factors, and work-related attitudes (affective commitment, job satisfaction) are all positively correlated and the 95% CIs and 80% CVs for all relationships had no zero. Third, the magnitude of true-score relationship between on-the-job embeddedness and work-related variables is somewhat stronger in this meta-analysis than in counterpart studies in western countries. Finally, estimating the incremental validity of on-the-job embeddedness using meta-analytic structural equation model, on-the- job embeddedness remains negatively related with turnover intention, after affective commitment and job satisfaction are controlled. This meta-analytic findings contribute to understanding of the relationships among job embeddedness and work-related variables among Korean employees. Future studies should attempt to overcome the limitations of this study such as lack of information related to demographics. Further, more primary studies are needed since there were very few available studies on actual turnover and off-the-job embeddedness. Hopefully, this study will be a good guide for the future Korean studies on job embeddedness.
Metrics
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
고득영, 유태용 (2012). 직무자율성과 혁신행동 간의 관계: 직무만족의 매개효과와 성격과 조직혁 신풍 토의 조절효과. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 25(1), 215-238.
권나영, 김민수, 오인수 (2016), 직무 자율성이 직무만족에 미치는 영향: 직무개선과 일 열의의 개인 내-개인간 다수준 매개효과를 중심으로, 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 29(4), 573-590.
김도영, 유태용 (2002). 성격의 5요인과 조직에서의 맥락수행간의 관계. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 15(2), 1-24.
김명소, 김혜원 (2000). 우리나라 기혼여성들의 심리적 안녕감의 구조분석 및 주관적 안녕감과의 관계분석. 한국심리학회지: 여성, 5(1), 27-41.
김수안, 민경환 (2011). 탄력성 척도의 비교 및 탄력성과 정서적 특성과의 관계 탐색. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 25(5), 223- 243. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2011.25.2.012
김주환, 김민규, 홍세희 (2009). 구조방정식으로 논문 쓰기. 서울: 커뮤니케이션북스.
김희진, 정승철 (2016). 직장인의 직무스트레스가 번영에 미치는 영향: 회복행동을 통한 정서적 안정성의 조절된 매개효과. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 29(3), 411-432.
박소희 (2016). 성격이 적응 수행에 미치는 영향에 대한 연구. 한국인적자원관리학회: 인적자원관리연구 23(3), 167-184.
신교수, 한태영 (2015). 직무열의와 생성감이 중장년 근로자 노후준비에 미치는 영향: 멘토링의 매개효과 및 성차의 효과. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 28(4), 609-634.
오선영, 노상충, 강민우, 서용원 (2015). 변혁적 리더십과 인간존중의 조직문화에 의한 회복탄력성이 조직구성원의 행복감과 조직효과성에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 28(4), 829-854.
오선영, 서용원(2015). 대인갈등이 관계 손상에 미치는 영향에 대한 긍정 감정의 조절효과: 조절된 매개 모형. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 28(4), 663∼688.
유치성, 손영우, 박인조 (2016), 자아탄력성, 감정 경험, 삶의 의미 및 직무만족의 구조적 관계 - 변혁적 리더십의 조절 효과. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 29(2), 175- 201.
유성경, 심혜원 (2002). 적응 유연한 청소년들의 심리적 보호요소 탐색. 한국교육심리학회: 교육심리연구 16(4), 189-206.
유태용, 이채령 (2016). 성격이 과업수행과 적응수행에 미치는 영향: 직무가공의 매개효과와 리더 임파워링 행동의 조절효과. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 29(4), 607- 630.
이종구 (2010). 직무역량을 기반으로 한 관리직 분류의 적절성 탐색. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 23(4), 783-801.
이종만 (2014). 직장인의 주관적 안녕감에 영향을 미치는 요인. 한국콘텐츠학회논문지, 14(1), 400-408.
이태정 (2003). 몰입 경험이 진로 태도 성숙 및 진로 결정 효능감에 미치는 영향. 홍익대학교 대학원 박사학위 논문,
이학식, 임지훈 (2013). 구조방정식 모형분석과 AMOS 20.0. 집현재.
임영재 (2015). 번영감의 선행영향요인과 효과성에 관한 실증연구. 충북대학교 경영학박사학위논문.
박상언, 김학수, 임영재 (2016). 번영감(Thriving at Work): 개념, 선행 영향요인, 그리고 효과성. 인사조직학회지: 인사·조직연구, 24 (2), 155~184.
정승철 (2015), 번영척도(flourishing Scale)의 타당화 연구: 개인적 요인 및 직무관련 요인과의 관계 탐색. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 28(2), 135-145.
정예슬, 박지영, 손영우, 하유진 (2013), 직업가치 유형이 조직몰입에 미치는 차별적 영향: 직무열의, 직무만족의 매개효과와 개인-조직 적합성의 조절효과. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 26(4), 507-532.
조영복, 주규하 (2013). 코칭행동이 조직구성원의 역할행동에 미치는 영향: 번영감의 매개효과. 대한경영학회지 경영학회, 26(10), 2711-2728.
최낙환, 김영성 (2013). 판매종업원의 역할행동에 영향을 미치는 업무열의요인에 관한 연구. 경영연구, 28(4), 111-138.
최해수 (2016). 호텔기업 직무피드백 특성이 직무만족과 조직몰입에 미치는 영향: 감성조절의 조절된 매개 효과. 대한관광경영학회지: 관광연구, 31(2), 223-242.
탁진국, 서형준, 김혜선, 남동엽, 정희정, 권누리, 김소영, 정일진 (2015), 일의 의미 척도개발 및 타당화. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직. 28(1), 437-456.
탁진국, 서형준, 원용재, 심현주 (2017). 일의 의미척도 구성타당도 검증: 직장인을 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 30 (3), 357-372.
탁진국, 이은주, 임그린 (2015). 경력적응성 척도의 타당화 검증. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 28(4), 591∼608.
한태영 (2004). 직무수행의 3요인 모형: 과제수행, 맥락수행, 및 적응수행 요인. 한국심리학회, 한국심리학회 학술대회 자료집, 234- 235.
홍세희 (2000). 구조 방정식 모형의 적합도 지수 선정기준과 그 근거. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 19(1), 161-177.
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc.
Benson, P. L., & Scales, P. C. (2009). The definition and preliminary measurement of thriving in adolescence. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4, 85-104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760802399240
Brown, D., Arnold, R., Fletcher, D. & Standage, M. (2017). Human thriving: A conceptual debate and literature review. European Psychologist, 22(3). 167-179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000294
Carver, C. S. (1998). Resilience and thriving: Issues, models, and linkages. Journal of Social Issues, 54, 245-266. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1998.tb01217.x
Carmeli, A. & Spreitzer G. (2009). Trust, connectivity, and thriving: Implications for innovative behaviors at work. Journal of Creative Behavior, 43(3), 169-191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2009.tb01313.x
Campbell J. P. & Wiernile B. M. (2015). The Modeling and Assessment of Work Performance. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology. 2, 47-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111427
Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of good- ness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(3), 464-504. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834
Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542-575. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.542
Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Biswas-Diener, R., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D., & Oishi, S. (2009). New measures of well-being. Assessing wellbeing: The collected works of Ed Diener (Vol. 3), 247-266. New York, NY: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2354-4_12
Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D. W., Oishi, S., & Biswas- Diener, R. (2010). New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 97(2), 143- 156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9493-y
Epel, E. S., McEwen, B. S., & Ickovics, J. R. (1998). Embodying psychological thriving: Physical thriving in response to stress. Journal of Social Issues, 54(2), 301-322. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1998.tb01220.x
Gagne, D. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 331-362. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.322
Gerbasi, A., Porath, C. L., Parker, A., Spreitzer, G., & Cross, R. (2015). Destructive de-energizing relationships: How thriving buffers their effect on performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(5), 1423-1433. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000015
Jiang, K., Liu, D., McKay, P. F., Lee, T. W., & Mitchell, T. R. (2012). When and how is job embeddedness predictive of turnover? A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(5), 1077-1096. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028610
Kocak Ӧ. E., (2016). How to Enable Thriving at Work through Organizational Trust. Journal of Research in Business & Social Science 5(4), 40-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v5i4.580
Levy R., Milner. K. (2016). The role of implicit person theories and psychological capital in workplace thriving. A research report, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. Maslow, A. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 40, 370-396.
Niessen, C., Sonnentag, S., & Sach, F. (2012). Thriving at work - A diary study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 468-487. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.763
Nimon, K. Reio, T. G. (2011). Regression commonality analysis: a technique for quantitative theory building. Human Resource Development Review, 10(3). Nix, G., Ryan, R. M., Manly, J. B., & Deci, E. L. (1999). Revitalization through self regulation: The effects of autonomous and controlled motivation on happiness and vitality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 266-284.
Paterson T. A. (2014). The institutional logics of rigor and relevance: An analysis of the rigor-relevance relationship and its impact on management research legitimacy. Ph.D. Dissertation, The University of Nebraska-Lincoln. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing, 3617435.
Paterson, T. A., Luthans, F., & Jeung, W. (2014). Thriving at work: Impact of psychological capital and supervisor support. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35, 434-446. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1907
Peens M.(2017). No best before date: Thriving at work during late career. Ph.D. Dissertation, Fielding Graduate University. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing, 10257672.
Porath, C., Spreitzer, G., Gibson, C., & Garnett, F. G. (2012). Thriving at work: Toward its measurement, construct validation, and theoretical refinement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 250-275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.756
Prem R., Ohly S., Kubicek B., & Korunka C. (2017). Thriving on challenge stressors? Exploring time pressure and learning demands as antecedents of thriving at work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38, 108-123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2115
Rogers, C. (1961), On Becoming a Person: A Therapist’s View of Psychotherapy. London: Constable.
Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personalityand Social Psychology, 57, 1069-1081. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069
Schaufeli, W. B. & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demand, job resource, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25. 293-315. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.248
Seligman, M. E. P. & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000a). Positive psychology [Special issue]. American Psychologist, 55.
Seligman, M. E. P. & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000b). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55, 5-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.55.1.5
Spreitzer, G.M. (1995). Psychological Empowerment in the Workplace: Dimensions, Measurement, and Validation. Academic Management Journal, 38, 1442-1465.
Spreitzer, G.M. (1996). Social structural characteristics of psychological empowerment: Academic Management Journal, 39, 483- 504. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/256789
Spreitzer, G., Sutcliffe, K., Dutton, J., Sonenshein, S., & Grant, A. M. (2005). A socially embedded model of thriving at work. Organization Science, 16, 537-549. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0153
Spreitzer, G., Sutcliffe, K., (2007), Thriving in organizations. Positive Organizational Behavior, 74-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446212752.n6
Spreitzer, G., Porath, C. L., & Gibson, C. B. (2012). Toward human sustainability: How to enable more thriving at work. Organizational Dynamics, 41, 155-162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2012.01.009
Spreitzer, G., Porath, C. (2013). Self-Determination as Nutriment for Thriving: an Integrative Model of Human Growth at Work. For Publication in Gagne.
Wallace, J. C., Butts, M. M., Johnson, P. D., Stevens, F. G., & Smith, M. B. (2016). A multilevel model of employee innovation: Understanding the effects of regulatory focus, thriving, and employee involvement climate. Journal of Management, 42, 982-1004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313506462