도로교통공단 (2010). 2010년판 교통사고통계.
박선진, 이순철, 김종회, 김인석 (2006). 오류와 착오가 고령운전자의 운전행동에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 사회문제, 12(1), 55-79.
신용균, 한덕웅, 류준범 (2009). 운전분노척도에 의한 과속운전 행동의 예측. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 14(1), 159-173.
안귀여루 (2001). 통제 소재에 따른 스트레스 과제에 대한 인지적 평가와 생리적 반응의 차이. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 6(1), 127-143.
오주석, 이순철 (2011). 운전행동 결정요인의 구성과 위험운전행동과의 관계. 한국심리학회지: 사회문제, 17(2), 175-197.
이순열, 이순철 (2007). 음주운전자들의 운전확신수준 특성이 교통사고에 미치는 영향: 경로분석을 이용한 연구. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 20(1), 43-55.
이순철 (2000). 교통심리학. 서울: 학지사
이순철, 오주석, 박선진, 이순열, 김인석 (2006). 고령운전자와 청소년운전자의 운전확신차이와 운전행동과의 관계. 한국심리학회: 사회문제, 12(1), 81-102.
진창원 (2007). 교통안전학. 동화기술.
최상진, 박정열, 김정인, 손영미 (2003). 한국사회의 교통문화. 한국심리학회지: 사회문제, 9(특집호), 15-34.
최상진, 손영미, 김정인, 박정열 (2001). 음주운전 결정요인에 관한 심리학적 연구. 대한교통학회지, 19(6), 33-47.
한덕웅, 이경성 (2002). 도로교통사고를 유발한 원인의 설명: 운전자와 교통경찰의 관점 비교. 한국심리학회지: 사회문제, 8(1), 41-59.
Abramowitz, S. I. (1969). Locus of Control and Self-reported Depression among College Student. Psychological Reports, 25, 149-150.
Allred, K. D. & Smith, T. W. (1989). The Hardy Personlity; Cognitive physiological response to evaluative threat. Journal of personality and social psychology, 56, 257-266.
Arthur, W., & Doverspike, D. (1992). Locus of control and auditory selective attention as predictors of driving accident involvement: A comparative longitudinal investigation. Journal of Safety Research, 23, 73-80.
Guastello, S. J., & Guastello, D. D. (1986). The relation between locus of construct and involvement in traffic accidents. The Journal of Psychology, 120(3), 293-297.
Hoyt, M. F. (1973). Internal-external control and beliefs about automobile travel. Journal of Research in Personality, 7, 288-293.
Iversen, H., & Rundmo, T. (2002). Personality, risky driving and accident involvement among Norwegian drivers. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 1251-1263.
Lajunen, T., & Summala, H. (1995). Driving experience, personality, and skill and safety motive dimensions in drivers’ self-assessments. Personality and Individual Differences, 3, 307-318.
Lefcourt, H. M. (1981). The construction and development of the multidimensional- multiattributional causality scales. In H. M. Lefcourt(Ed.), Research with the locus of control construct, 1, 245-277.
Lucidi, F., Giannini, A. M., Sgalla, R., Mallia, L., Devoto, A., & Reichmann, S. (2010) Young novice driver subtypes: Relationship to driving violations, errors and lapses. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 42, 1698-1696.
McGwin, G. Jr., & Brown, D. B. (1999). Characteristics of traffic crashes among young, middle-aged, and older drivers. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 31, 181-198.
Montag, I., & Comrey, A. L. (1987). Internality and externality as correlates of involvement in fatal driving accidents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 339-343.
Nils, P. G. (1996). Young drivers' overestimation of their own skill-An experiment on the relation between training strategy and skill. Accident Analysis and prevention, 28(2), 243-250.
Özkan, T., & Lajunen, T. (2005). Multidimensional traffic locus of control scale (T-LOC):factor structure and relationship to risky driving. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 533-545.
Rotter, J. B. (1954). Social learning and clinical psychology. NY: Prentice-Hall.
Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80.
Rotter, J. B. (1976). Some provlems and misconceptions related to the construct of internal versus external control of reinforcement. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43, 56-67.
Tanck, R. H., Robbins, P. R. (1979) Assertiveness, locus of control and coping behaviors used to diminish tension. Journal of Personality Assessment, 43, 396-400.
Wallston, K. A., & Wallston, B. S. (1981). Health Locus of Control scales. In H. M. Lefcourt (Ed.), Research with the locus of control construct, 1, 189-243.
Warner, H., Özkan, T., & Lajunen, T. (2010) Can the trafﬁc locus of control (T-LOC) scale be successfully used to predict Swedish drivers'speeding behaviour?. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 42, 1113-1117.
Williams, A. F. (1972). Factors associated with seat belt use in families. Journal of Safety Research, 4, 133-138.
- Abstract viewed - 68 times
- PDF downloaded - 43 times
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© Korean Journal for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2015
Road Traffic Authority
How to Cite
The relationship between multidimensional traffic locus of control and reckless driving behavior
Vol 28 No 1 (2015): Korean Journal of Industrial and Organizational Psychology
Submitted: Jul 11, 2019
Published: Feb 28, 2015
This study investigated the relationship between Traffic Locus of Control(T-LOC) and Reckless Driving Behavior, by using correlation analysis and a hierarchical regression for the data gathered through 294 adults. First, this study examined correlation analysis between T-LOC and Driving Behavior Determinants(DBD). As a result, “Self” and “Other drivers” factors of T-LOC were positively correlated with ‘Interpersonal Anger’ factor, “Vehicle/Environment” factor was positively correlated with ‘Avoiding Problems’ factor, and external “Fate” was positively correlated with ‘Avoiding Problems’, ‘Benefit/Stimulus Seeking’, ‘Interpersonal Anger’ and ‘Aggression’. Whereas, there was positively correlated between all T-LOC and ‘Interpersonal Anger’. The result to examine influence of T-LOC on Reckless Driving Behavior was showed that T-LOC had significant amount of explained variance on Speed Driving and Wild Driving of Reckless Driving Behavior. And this showed that Fate effected on all Reckless Driving Behavior. That is, drivers who think that an accident caused by a ‘fate’ which can’t be observed, unlike their actions, other drivers, vehicles and driving environments tend to drive more dangerously.