Influence of organizational culture supporting work-life balance on well-being and depression mediated by work-life balance An application of multi-group analysis across gender and age

Article Sidebar

PDF XML
Published: Feb 28, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24230/kjiop.v32i1.1-27

Main Article Content

Jeong Mi Lee
Yongmoon Graduate School of Counseling Psychology
Hwan Gyu Choi
WLBKOREA

Abstract

This study aimed to verify the structural relationship among organizational culture, work-life balance, wellbeing and depression. A total of 569 Korean employees were recruited. The measurement model and the structural model were verified and also the model applicability was examined through cross-validation across gender and age. The results show that organizational culture supporting work-life balance has positive effect on employees’ well-being and work-life balance whereas has negative effect on depression, and those effects are mediated by work-life balance. The results from the multi-group analysis showed that for both male and female employees in all age groups, organizational culture supporting work-life balance has significant effect on well-being, depression and work-life balance. In addition, it was verified that work-life balance significantly affects well-being and depression in all age groups regardless of gender.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
Lee, J. M., & Choi, H. G. (2019). Influence of organizational culture supporting work-life balance on well-being and depression mediated by work-life balance: An application of multi-group analysis across gender and age. Korean Journal of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 32(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.24230/kjiop.v32i1.1-27
Issue
Vol. 32 No. 1 (2019): Korean Journal of Industrial and Organizational Psychology
Section
Empirical Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

고영복 (2000). 사회학사전. 서울: 사회문화연구소.

김성국, 김태은 (1999). 경력(Career)개념의 변화와 미래 방향에 관한 이론적 고찰. 경영논총, 17(1).

김성남, 이규만 (2012). 경력계획, 직무적합성 및 직장․가정 갈등이 경력성공에 미치는 영향. 대한경영학회지, 25(3). 1419-1438.

김영봉, 최철용, 강병재, 박혜경, 김혜진 (2007). 교육심리학. 서울: 서현사.

김홍범, 민정아 (2011). 관광기업 유형별에 따른 조직 내 네트워킹 행동이 관광기업의 조직성과에 미치는 영향. 관광학연구. 35(1), 283-303.

김희진 (2012). 경력지향성과 네트워킹 행동이 이직의도에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구. 이화여자대학교 대학원. 석사학위 청구논문.

박권생, 박태진, 성현란, 이종한, 최해림, 홍기원 (2009). 심리학과 삶. 서울: 시그마프레스.

서형도, 조영호 (2010). 네트워크 행동과 경력만족: 조직적합성 변수의 매개효과. 한국인사조직학회, 2010(2), 1-22.

오은혜, 탁진국 (2012). 경력계획이 주관적 경력성공에 미치는 영향: 긍정심리자본의 매개효과와 미래시간전망과 코칭리더십의 조절효과. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직. 25(4), 727-748.

왕 설 (2010). 네트워킹행위와 멘토링이 경력만족 및 조직몰입에 미치는 영향: 경력 초기 중국 직장인 대상으로. 한성대학교 대학원. 석사학위 청구논문.

왕 설, 하성욱, 차종석 (2011). 네트워킹 행위와 멘토링이 경력 만족과 조직 몰입에 미치는 영향: 경력 초기 중국 80후(바링허우)세대를 대상으로. 대한경영학회. 2011 (1). 101-123.

유영민 (2000). 리더쉽유형과 조직전념도와의 관계에 관한 연구: 성취욕구, 권력욕구, 친교욕구를 조절변수로. 서강대학교 대학원 석사학위 청구논문.

윤하나, 탁진국 (2006). 주관적 경력성공에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 연구. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 19(3), 325-347.

윤형섭 (2011). 휴먼 네트워킹. 서울: 오래.

이종수 (2009). 행정학 사전. 한국: 대영문화사.

인재경영연구원 (2010). 32인의 인맥경영 전문가들이 전수하는 인맥특강. 서울: 서울경제경영, 157.

임희정 (2009). 조직문화, 멘토링 및 네트워킹이 여성관리자의 경력성공에 미치는 효과. 한국인사관리학회, 33(4). 95-120.

장환영, 손지영 (2012). 대졸 30대 직장여성의 경력성공에 대한 인식 탐색. Interdisciplinary Journal of Adult & Continuing Education. 15(2). 57-84.

전수진 (2006). 남성 관리자와 여성 관리자의 사회 네트워크 비교 분석. 산학경영연구. 9(1), 1-24.

전수진, 박경규 (2009). 사회 네트워크가 고용 및 승진가능성의 지각에 미치는 영향에 있어 정보접근의 매개효과에 대한 연구. 한독경상학회, 27(1). 1-27.

정명호, 박혜원 (2009). 조직 내 상이한 네트워크가 직무태도에 미치는 차별적 효과. 산업관계연구, 19(1). 37-64.

조 양 (2013). 네트워킹 행동과 조직의 심리적 계약 이행이 직무소진에 미치는 영향: 중국 직장인 대상으로. 한성대학교 대학원. 석사학위 청구논문.

최준섭 (2011). 리더의 사회적 네트워킹 행동이 조직유효성에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구: 신뢰와 신뢰성의 조절효과를 중심으로. 아주대학교 대학원. 석사학위 청구논문.

파이낸셜뉴스 (2013. 07.17). 직장인 거짓우정의 목적 1위는? ‘원활한 업무협조 위해’. http://www.fnnews.com/view?ra=Sent0601m_View&corp=fnnews&arcid=201307170100175110009870&cDateYear=2013&cDateMonth=07&cDateDay=17

Brass, D. J. (1984). Being in the right place: A structural analysis of individual influence on an organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 518-539. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2392937

Forret, M. L., & Dougherty, T. W. (2001). Correlates of networking behavior for managerial and professional employees, Group and Organization Management, 26(3), 283-311. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601101263004

Forret, M. L., & Dougherty, T. W. (2004). Networking behaviors and career outcomes: differences for men and women?, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(3), 419-437. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.253

Gerrg, R. J. & Zimbardo, P. G. (1999). Psychology and Life, Allyn & Bacon.

Luthans, F., Rosenkrantz, S. A., & Hennessey, H. W. (1985). What do successful managers really do? An observation study of managerial activities. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 21(3), 255-270. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002188638502100303

Ibarra, H. (1992). Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in and access in and advertising firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 422- 447. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2393451

Jha, S. (2010). Need for Growth, Achievement, Power and Affiliation: Determinants of Psychological Empowerment. Global Business Review, 11(3), 379-393. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/097215091001100305

Judge, T. A., Cable, D. M., Boudreau, J. W., & Bretz, R. D. (1995). An Empirical Investigation of The Predictors of Executive Career Success. Personnel Psychology, 48(3), 485-519. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01767.x

Maslow, A. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York. NY: Harper.

Matsui, T., Okada, A. & Kakuyama, T. (1982). Influence of Achievement Need on Goal Setting, Performance, and Feedback Effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(5), 654-648. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.67.5.645

McClelland, D. C. (1985). Human motivation. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.

Mirvis, P. H., & Hall, D. T. (1994). Psychological success and the boundaryless career. Journal of organizational behavior, 15(4), 365-380. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030150406

Morrison, E. W. (2002). Newcomers' relationships: The role of social network ties during socialization. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1149-1160.

Murray, H. A. (1938). Explorations in Personality. Oxford University Press.

Ng, T. W. H., Eby, L. T., Sorensen, K. L. & Feldman, D. C. (2005). Predictors of Objective and Subjective Career Success: A Meta-Analysis. Personnel Psychology, 58, 367- 408. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00515.x

Orpen, C. (1996). Dependency as a Moderator of the Effects of Networking Behavior on Managerial Career Success. The Journal of Psychology, 130(3), 245-248. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1996.9915006

Rasdi, R. M., Garavan, T. N., & Ismail, M. (2013). Networking behaviors and managers' career success in the Malaysian public service: The moderating effect of gender. Personnel Review, 42(6), 684-703. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-07-2010-0117

Seibert, S. E., Crant, J. M., & Kraimer, M. L. (1999). Proactive Personality and Career Success. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(3), 416-427. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.84.3.416

Sparrowe, R. T., Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Kraimer, M. L. (2001). Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups. Academy of management journal, 44(2), 316-325

Wang, J. (2009). Networking in the workplace: Implications for women's career development. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2009(122), 33-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.332

Wiesenfeld, B. M., Raghuram, S., & Garud, R. (2001). Organizational identification among virtual workers: The role of need for affiliation and perceived work-based social support. Journal of Management, 27(2), 213- 229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630102700205

Wolff, H. G., & Moser, K. (2009). Effects of Networking on Career Success: A Longitudinal Study, Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1), 196-206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013350

Wolff, H. G., & Kim, S. (2012). The relationship between networking behaviors and the Big Five personality dimensions. Career Development International, 17(1), 43-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/13620431211201328