A Study on the Exploration of the Constructs of Job PerformanceBased on Task Performance, Contextual Performance,Adaptive Performance and Counterproductive Work Behavior
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to (1) propose and validate the integrative job performance model composed of task performance, contextual performance, adaptive performance, and counterproductive work behavior (CWB), which have been identified as major dimensions of job performance in existing research, (2) explore the possibility of G factor in the 4 dimensions based on the integrative model, and (3) compare differences in the antecedents of personality variables and criteria of job effectiveness to confirm independence among performance dimensions. A total of 649 employees from various organizations participated in two online surveys. The main results were as follows. First, the factor structures of individual performance dimensions were examined through exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis before verifying the integrated model. A single factor structure for task performance and two-factor structure for CWB aimed at individuals (CWB-I) and organizations (CWB-O) were identified. Both contextual and adaptive performance were shown to have a hierarchical factor structure. Specifically, contextual performance consists of the 3-6 factor structure of individual-oriented (help-cooperation and consideration-courtesy), organization-oriented (organizational support and compliance), and conscientious-initiative (persistence-initiative and self-development). For adaptive performance, the 2-5 factor structure was extracted. That is, the five factors of adaptive performance are divided into two factors of reactive (coping, interpersonal adaptation, and stress) and proactive (creativity and learning). The integrative job performance model of task performance, contextual performance, adaptive performance, and CWB was verified. The hierarchical factor structure of the integrated model composed of the sub-factors of each performance dimension was also confirmed. Second, the Average Variance Extracted (AVE) demonstrated that the variance of G factor is 62.0%, supporting the presence of G factor in performance. Third, the differences were found in both antecedents of personality (HEXACO and dark personality factors) and criteria of job effectiveness (wage, promotion, job satisfaction, job engagement, burnout, and turnover intention) among the 4 dimensions of job performance. indicating the discriminant validity of performance dimensions. Finally, the implications and limitations of this study were discussed based on the above findings.
Metrics
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Allen, C., & Frame, M. (2018). The Measure of Adaptive Performance (MAP) scale: A confirmatory factor analysis with law enforcement officers. Poster presented at the 14th annual River Cities Industrial/ Organizational Psychology conference, Chattanooga, TN.https://scholar.utc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1116&context=rcio
Allen, D. G., & Griffeth, R. W. (2001). Test of a mediated performance–turnover relationship highlighting the moderating roles of visibility and reward contingency. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(5), 1014-1021.doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.1014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.1014
Ashton, M., & Lee, K. (2009). The HEXACO-60: A Short Measure of the Major Dimensions of Personality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(4), 340-345.doi:10.1080/00223890902935878 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890902935878
Bandalos, D. L. (2002). The Effects of Item Parceling on Goodness-of-Fit and Parameter Estimate Bias in Structural Equation Modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(1), 78-102.doi:10.1207/s15328007sem0901_5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0901_5
Bateman, T. S., & Organ, D. W. (1983). Job Satisfaction and the Good Soldier: The Relationship Between Affect and Employee “Citizenship.” Academy of Management Journal, 26(4), 587-595. doi:10.5465/255908 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/255908
Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big 5 Personality Dimensions and Job Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1-26.doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x
Bennett, R. J., & Robinson, S. L. (2000). Development of a measure of workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3), 349-360. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.3.349 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.3.349
Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238-246.https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
Berry, C. M., Ones, D. S., & Sackett, P. R. (2007). Interpersonal deviance, organizational deviance, and their common correlates: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(2), 410-424.doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.410 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.410
Bergman, M. E., Donovan, M. A., Drasgow, F., Overton, R. C., & Henning, J. B. (2008). Test of Motowidlo et al.'s (1997) theory of individual differences in task and contextual performance. Human Performance, 21(3), 227- 253. doi:10.1080/08959280802137606 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08959280802137606
Borman, W., & Motowidlo, S. (1993). Expanding the Criterion Domain to Include Elements of Contextual Performance, in N. Schmitt & W. C. Borman (Eds.), Personnel Selection in Organizations, (p. 71-98), ISBN-10: 1555424 759
Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1997). Task Performance and Contextual Performance: The Meaning for Personnel Selection Research. Human Performance, 10(2), 99-109. doi:10.1207/s15327043hup1002_3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1002_3
Borman, W. C., Buck, D. E., Hanson, M. A., Motowidlo, S. J., Stark, S., & Drasgow, F. (2001). An examination of the comparative reliability, validity, and accuracy of performance ratings made using computerized adaptive rating scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(5), 965-973.doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.965 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.965
Brogden, H. E., & Taylor, E. K. (1950). The Dollar Criterion?Applying the Cost Accounting Concept to Criterion Construction. Personnel Psychology, 3(2), 133-154.doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1950.tb01691.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1950.tb01691.x
Browne, M.W. & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K.A. Bollen, & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 136-162. ISBN: 0-8039-4506-X
Burmeister, A., Wang, M., & Hirschi, A. (2020). Understanding the motivational benefits of knowledge transfer for older and younger workers in age-diverse coworker dyads: An actor–partner interdependence model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 105(7), 748-759. doi:10.1037/apl0000466 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000466
Cammann, C., Fichman, M., Jenkins, D. and Klesh, J. (1979) The Michigan Organizational Assessment Questionnaire. Unpublished Manuscript, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.https://www.scirp.org/(S(i43dyn45teexjx455qlt3d2q))/reference/ReferencesPapers.aspx?ReferenceID=2018239
Campbell, J. P. (1990). Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (p. 687-732). Consulting Psychologists Press. ISBN: 9780891060420
Campbell, J. P., McCloy, R.A., Oppler, S. H. and Sager, C. E. (1993). A Theory of Performance. In: Schmitt, N. and Borman, W.C (Eds.), Personnel Selection in Organizations(p. 35-70). Jossey-Bass Publishers. ISBN: 1555424759
Campbell, J. P. (2012). Behavior, performance, and effectiveness in the twenty-first century. In S. W. J. Kozlowski (Ed.), Oxford library of psychology. The Oxford handbook of organizational psychology, Vol. 1 (p. 159-194). Oxford University Press.doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199928309.013.0006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199928309.013.0006
Campbell, J. P., & Wiernik, B. M. (2015). The modeling and assessment of work performance. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2, 47-74. doi: 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111427 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111427
Carpenter, N. C., & Arthur, W., Jr. (2013). The conceptual versus empirical distinctiveness of work performance constructs: The impact of work performance items. In D. J. Svyantek & K. T. Mahoney (Eds.), Research in organizational sciences. Received wisdom, kernels of truth, and boundary conditions in organizational studies (p. 201-238). IAP Information Age Publishing. ISBN: 1623961 890
Carpini, J. A., & Parker, S. K. (2017). The Bigger Picture: How Organizational Citizenship Behaviors Fit Within a Broader Conceptualization of Work Performance. Oxford Handbooks Online.doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190219000.013.3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190219000.013.3
Cascio, W. F, & Aguinis. H. (2010). Applied psychology in human resource management, Pearson Education. ISBN: 9780136090953
Charbonnier-Voirin, A., & Roussel, P. (2012). Adaptive Performance: A New Scale to Measure Individual Performance in Organizations. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 29(3), 280-293.doi:10.1002/cjas.232 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.232
Chiaburu, D. S., Oh, I.-S., Berry, C. M., Li, N., & Gardner, R. G. (2011). The five-factor model of personality traits and organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(6), 1140-1166. doi:10.1037/a0024004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024004
Cho, I. C., & Kim, M. S. (2010). An Exploratory Study on the Construct Validity of Derailment Factors and their Effect on College Life Effectiveness: An Application of the HDS. Korean Journal of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 23(3), 575-603.doi:10.24230/ksiop.23.3.201008.575 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24230/ksiop.23.3.201008.575
Cho, J. Y., & Kim, M. S. (2015). Development and Validation of the Job Crafting Scale. Journal of Life-span Studies, 5(3), 29-46. doi:10.30528/jolss.2015.5.3.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30528/jolss.2015.5.3.003
Coleman, V. I., & Borman, W. C. (2000). Investigating the Underlying Structure of the Citizenship Performance Domain. Human Resource Management Review, 10(1), 25-44. doi:10.1016/s1053-4822(99)00037-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-4822(99)00037-6
Cortina, J. M., & Luchman, J. N. (2012). Personnel selection and employee performance. In N. W. Schmitt, S. Highhouse, & I. B. Weiner (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Industrial and organizational psychology (p. 143-183). John Wiley & Sons,doi:10.1002/9781118133880.hop212007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118133880.hop212007
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.doi:10.1177/002224378101800104 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
Gaddis, B. H., & Foster, J. L. (2013). Meta-Analysis of Dark Side Personality Characteristics and Critical Work Behaviors among Leaders across the Globe: Findings and Implications for Leadership Development and Executive Coaching. Applied Psychology, 64(1), 25-54. doi:10.1111/apps.12017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12017
Gellatly, I. R. (1996). Conscientiousness and task performance: Test of cognitive process model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(5), 474-482. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.81.5.474 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.81.5.474
Ghiselli, E. E., & Barthol, R. P. (1953). The validity of personality inventories in the selection of employees. Journal of Applied Psychology, 37(1), 18-20. doi:10.1037/h0059438 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0059438
Gough, H. G. (1971). The Assessment of Wayward Imoulse by Means of The Personnel Reaction Blank. Personnel Psychology, 24(4), 669-677.doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1971.tb00380.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1971.tb00380.x
Griffin, M. A., Neal, A., & Parker, S. K. (2007). A New Model of Work Role Performance: Positive Behavior in Uncertain and Interdependent Contexts. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 327-347.doi:10.5465/amj.2007.24634438 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24634438
Han, B. J. (2014). a problem-solving Planning. Green Rain, (p. 21-68). ISBN: 9791195174 201
Han, T. Y. (2005). Adaptive Performance and Its Individual and Team-Level Antecedents: From a Multilevel Approach. Korean Journal of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 18(1), 51-77. UCI:G704-000280.2005.18.1.004
Hogan, J., & Roberts, B. W. (1996). Issues and non-issues in the fidelity-bandwidth trade-off. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17(6), 627-637.doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199611)17:6<627::AID-JOB2828>3.0.CO;2-F DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199611)17:6<627::AID-JOB2828>3.0.CO;2-F
Hogan, R., & Hogan, J. (1997). Hogan development survey manual. Tulsa, OK: HAS.
Huang, J. L., Ryan, A. M., Zabel, K. L., & Palmer, A. (2014). Personality and adaptive performance at work: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(1), 162-179. doi:10.1037/a0034285 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034285
Hunter, J. E., & Hunter, R. F. (1984). Validity and utility of alternative predictors of job performance. Psychological Bulletin, 96(1), 72-98. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.96.1.72 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.96.1.72
Ilgen, D. R., & Pulakos, E. D, (1999) “Employee performance in today’s organizations” In D. R. Ilgen, E. D. Pulakos (Eds.), The changingnature of performance: Implications for staffing, motivation, and development, Frontiers of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. ISBN: 978-0-787-94625-8
Ilies, R., Fulmer, I. S., Spitzmuller, M., & Johnson, M. D. (2009). Personality and citizenship behavior: The mediating role of job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(4), 945-959. doi:10.1037/a0013329 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013329
Jaimovich, N., & Siu, H. (2012). Job Polarization and Jobless Recoveries. doi:10.3386/w18334 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w18334
Jex, S., & Britt, T. (2008). Organizational Psychology: A Scientist-Practitioner Approach. (Y. S. Park, Y. W. Seo., J. I. Lee., J. Y. Jang., Trans.). Wiley. ISBN: 8958328878
Johnson, J. W. (2001). The relative importance of task and contextual performance dimensions to supervisor judgments of overall performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(5), 984-996. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.984 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.984
Judge, T. A., Piccolo, R. F., & Kosalka, T. (2009). The bright and dark sides of leader traits: A review and theoretical extension of the leader trait paradigm. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(6), 855-875.doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.09.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.09.004
Judge, T. A., & LePine, J. A. (2007). The bright and dark sides of personality: Implications for personnel selection in individual and team contexts. In J. Langan-Fox, C. L. Cooper, & R. J. Klimoski (Eds.), New horizons in management. Research companion to the dysfunctional workplace: Management challenges and symptoms (p. 332-355). Edward Elgar Publishing.doi:10.4337/9781847207081.00028 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781847207081.00028
Katz, D. (1964). The motivational basis of organizational behavior. Behavioral Science, 9(2), 131-146. doi:10.1002/bs.3830090206 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830090206
Kim, D. Y., & Yoo, T. Y (2002). The relationships between the Big Five personality factors and contextual performance in work organizations. Korean Journal of Industria and Organozational psyckology, 15(2), 1-24.UCI:G704-000280.2002.15.2.005
Kim, H. T. (2017). A study on the effect of servant leadership on trust in leader and job engagement (Dongeui University). Retrieved from http://dongeui.dcollection.net/jsp/common/DcLoOrgPer.jsp?sItemId=000002382294
Kim, S. N., Kim, M. S., & Han, Y. S. (2014). Exploration of Faking on Measures of Dark Side of Personality in terms of Gender, Response Situation, Type of Measures. Korean journal of woman psychology, 19, 1(2014), 71-91. doi:10.18205/kpa.2014.19.1.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18205/kpa.2014.19.1.004
Kim, Y. S., Kim, M. S., & Han, Y. S. (2013). Gender Differences on Job Burnout among South Korean Employees. Korean journal of woman psychology, 18(2), 317-337. doi:10.18205/kpa.2013.18.2.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18205/kpa.2013.18.2.004
Koopmans, L., Bernaards, C., Hildebrandt, V., van Buuren, S., van der Beek, A. J., & de Vet, H. C. W. (2013). Development of an individual work performance questionnaire. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 62(1), 6-28. doi:10.1108/17410401311285273 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/17410401311285273
Krischer, M. M., Penney, L. M., & Hunter, E. M. (2010). Can counterproductive work behaviors be productive? CWB as emotion-focused coping. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 15(2), 154-166. doi:10.1037/a0018349 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018349
Landis, R. S., Beal, D. J., & Tesluk, P. E. (2000). A Comparison of Approaches to Forming Composite Measures in Structural Equation Models. Organizational Research Methods, 3(2), 186-207. doi:10.1177/109442810032003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810032003
Lawler, E., Cammann, C., Nadler, D., & Jenkins, D. (1975). Michigan Organizational Assessment Questionnaire. PsycTESTS Dataset. doi:10.1037/t01581-000 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/t01581-000
Lee, K., Ashton, M. C., & de Vries, R. E. (2005). Predicting Workplace Delinquency and Integrity with the HEXACO and Five-Factor Models of Personality Structure. Human Performance, 18(2), 179-197.doi:10.1207/s15327043hup1802_4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1802_4
Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2012). The H Factor of Personality Why Some People Are Manipulative, Self-Entitled, Materialistic, and Exploitivea and Why It Matters for Everyone. (K. Lee, Trans.). Wilfrid Laurier University Press. ISBN: 9781554588343
Lepine, J. A., Colquitt, J. A., & Erez, A. (2000). Adaptability to Changing Task Contexts: Effects of General Cognitive Ability, Cnscientiousness, and Openness to Experience. Personnel Psychology, 53(3), 563-593. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2000.tb00214.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2000.tb00214.x
Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. (2002). To Parcel or Not to Parcel: Exploring the Question, Weighing the Merits. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 151-173. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem0902_1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_1
Little, T. D., Rhemtulla, M., Gibson, K., & Schoemann, A. M. (2013). Why the items versus parcels controversy needn’t be one. Psychological Methods, 18(3), 285-300. doi:10.1037/a0033266 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033266
Lynda, G. (2011). (The)shift: the future of work is already here. (J. S. Cho, Trans.). Collins. ISBN: 000742793X
Maeng, S., Koo, S., & Cho, Y. I. (2018). Item Parceling in Structural Equation Modeling: Exploratory Factor Analysis Approach and Content-based Approach. Korean Journal of Human Development, 25(3), 73-89. dol: 10.15284/kjhd.2018.25.3.73 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15284/kjhd.2018.25.3.73
MacKenzie, Podsakoff, & Podsakoff. (2011). Construct Measurement and Validation Procedures in MIS and Behavioral Research: Integrating New and Existing Techniques. MIS Quarterly, 35(2), 293.doi: 10.2307/23044045 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/23044045
Marcus, B., & Schuler, H. (2004). Antecedents of Counterproductive Behavior at Work: A General Perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(4), 647-660.doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.4.647 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.4.647
McElroy, J. C., Morrow, P. C., & Rude, S. N. (2001). Turnover and organizational performance: A comparative analysis of the effects of voluntary, involuntary, and reduction-in-force turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(6), 1294-1299.doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.6.1294 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.6.1294
Motowildo, S. J., Borman, W. C., & Schmit, M. J. (1997). A Theory of Individual Differences in Task and Contextual Performance. Human Performance, 10(2), 71-83.doi:10.1207/s15327043hup1002_1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1002_1
Motowidlo, S. J., & Keil, H. J. (2013). Job performance. In N. W. Schmitt, S. Highhouse, & I. B. Weiner (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Industrial and organizational psychology (p. 82-103). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.. ISBN: 978-0-470-76887-7
Murphy, K. R. (1994). Toward a broader conception of jobs and job performance: Impact of changes in the military environment on the structure, assessment, and prediction of job performance. In M. G. Rumsey., C. B. Walker., J. H. Harris (Eds.), Personel selection and classification, Hilsdale, NJ: (p. 85-102). ISBN-10: 0805816445
Murphy, K. R., & Cleveland, J. N. (1995). Understanding Performance Appraisal: Social, Organizational, and Goal-Based Perspectives, Sage Publications, Inc. ISBN: 0803954751.
Murphy, K. R., & Lee, S. L. (1994). Personality variables related to integrity test scores: The role of conscientiousness. Journal of Business and Psychology, 8(4), 413-424.doi:10.1007/bf02230957 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02230957
Muchinsky, P. M., & Culbertson, S. S. (2015). Psychology Applied to Work. (T. Y. Yoo, Trans.). Hypergraphic Press. ISBN: 097493450X
Ones, D. S., Viswesvaran, C., & Schmidt, F. L. (1993). Comprehensive meta-analysis of integrity test validities: Findings and implications for personnel selection and theories of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 679-703.doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.78.4.679 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.4.679
Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington Books/D. C. Heath and Com. ISBN-10: 0669117889
Organ, D. W. (1997). Organizational citizenship behavior: It's construct clean-up time. Human Performance, 10(2), 85-97.https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1002_2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1002_2
Park, S. H. (2016). The Impact of individual Personality on Adaptive Performance in Organizations. Journal of Human Resource Management Research, 23(3), 167-184. UCI: G704-001783.2016.23.3.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14396/jhrmr.2016.23.3.167
Petrou, P., Demerouti, E., Peeters, M. C. W., Schaufeli, W. B., & Hetland, J. (2012). Crafting a job on a daily basis: Contextual correlates and the link to work engagement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(8), 1120-1141. doi:10.1002/job.1783 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1783
Pearlman, K., & Barney, M. (1999). Selection for a Changing Workplace. In Jerard F. K. (Eds.), Managing Selection in Changing Organizations: Human Resource Strategies. ISBN: 978-0-787-94474-2
Ployhart, R., & Bliese, P. (2006). Individual Adaptability (I-ADAPT) Theory: Conceptualizing the Antecedents, Consequences, and Measurement of Individual Differences in Adaptability. Advances in Human Performance and Cognitive Engineering Research, 3-39.doi:10.1016/s1479-3601(05)06001-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1479-3601(05)06001-7
Podsakoff, N. P., Whiting, S. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & Blume, B. D. (2009). Individual and organizational-level consequences of organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta- analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1), 122-141.https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013079 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013079
Podsakoff, & Williams. (1986). The relationship between job performance and job satisfaction. In E. A. Locke (Eds.), Generalizing from laboratory to field setting, (p. 207-253). ISBN: 066909692X
Prentice, C., & Thaichon, P. (2019). Revisiting the job performance–burnout relationship. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 28(7), 807-832. doi:10.1080/19368623.2019.1568340 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2019.1568340
Pulakos, E. D., Arad, S., Donovan, M. A., & Plamondon, K. E. (2000). Adaptability in the workplace: Development of a taxonomy of adaptive performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(4), 612-624.doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.85.4.612 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.4.612
Pulakos, E. D., Borman, W. C., & Hough, L. M. (1988). Test validation for scientific understanding: Two demonstrations of an approach to studying predictor-criterion linkages. Personnel Psychology, 41(4), 703-716.doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1988.tb00648.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1988.tb00648.x
Pulakos, E. D., Schmitt, N., Dorsey, D. W., Arad, S., Hedge, J. W., & Borman, W. C. (2002). Predicting adaptive performance: Further tests of a model of adaptability. Human Performance, 15(4), 299-324.doi: 10.1207/S15327043HUP1504_01 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327043HUP1504_01
Roberts, B. W., Harms, P. D., Caspi, A., & Moffitt, T. E. (2007). Predicting the counterproductive employee in a child-to-adult prospective study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(5), 1427-1436.doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1427 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1427
Roberts, B. W., Jackson, J. J., Fayard, J. V., Edmonds, G., & Meints, J. (2009). Conscientiousness. In Leary, M. R., & Hoyle, R. H. (Eds). Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 369-381). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Rolland, J. P., & De Fruyt, F. (2003). The validity of FFM personality dimensions and maladaptive traits to predict negative affects at work: A six month prospective study in a military sample. European Journal of Personality, 17(Suppl1), S101-S121. doi: 10.1002/per.485 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/per.485
Rotundo, M., & Sackett, P. R. (2002). The relative importance of task, citizenship, and counterproductive performance to global ratings of job performance: A policy-capturing approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 66-80. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.87.1.66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.1.66
Sackett, P. R., & Wanek, J. E. (1996). New developments in the use of measures of honesty, integrity, conscientiousness, dependability, trustworthiness, and reliability for personnel selection. Personnel Psychology, 49(4), 787-829.doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1996.tb02450.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1996.tb02450.x
Sackett, P. R., Lievens, F., Van Iddekinge, C. H., & Kuncel, N. R. (2017). Individual differences and their measurement: A review of 100 years of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 25-273. doi:10.1037/apl0000151 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000151
Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The Measurement of Work Engagement With a Short Questionnaire: A Cross-National Study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701-716. doi: 10.1177/0013164405282471 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282471
Schaufeli, W., Leiter, M., Maslach, C. & Jackson, S. (1996) Maslach Burnout Inventory-General Survey. In Maslach, C., Jackson, S. E. and Leiter, M. P. (Eds), The Maslach Burnout Inventory: Test Manual, Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA.
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 262-274.doi:10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.262 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.262
Schmitt, N., & Chan, D. (2014). Adapting to rapid changes at work: Definitions, measures and research. In D. Chan (Ed.), Organization and management series. Individual adaptability to changes at work: New directions in research (p. 3-17). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. ISBN: 0415832918.
Shin, K. H. (2003). The Maslach Bunout Inventory -General Survey (MBI-GS): An Application In South Korea. Korean Journal of Industria and Organozational psyckology, 16(3), 1-17.UCI: G704-000280.2003.16.3.009
Sonnentag, S., Volmer, J., & Spychala, A. (2008). Job Performance. The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Behavior: Volume I - Micro Approaches, 427-448.doi:10.4135/9781849200448.n24 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849200448.n24
Spector, P. E. (1997). The role of frustration in antisocial behavior at work. In R. A. Giacalone & J. Greenberg (Eds.), Antisocial behavior in organizations (p. 1–17). Sage Publications, Inc. ISBN: 0803972369
Sun, D. I. (2017). The future of work: what changes and what and comes. Inpluential. Influential ISBN: 9791186560365
Son, H. S., & Yoo, T. Y. (2011). The Effect of Openness, Extroversion, and Core Self- Evaluation on Commitment to Change and Adaptive Performance. Korean Journal of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 24(2), 281-306.doi: 10.24230/ksiop.24.2.201105.281 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24230/ksiop.24.2.201105.281
Tehseen, S., Ramayah, T., & Sajilan, S. (2017). Testing and Controlling for Common Method Variance: A Review of Available Methods. Journal of Management Sciences, 4(2), 142-168. doi:10.20547/jms.2014.1704202 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20547/jms.2014.1704202
Thoresen, C. J., Bradley, J. C., Bliese, P. D., & Thoresen, J. D. (2004). The Big Five Personality Traits and Individual Job Performance Growth Trajectories in Maintenance and Transitional Job Stages. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 835-853. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.835 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.835
Tims, M., & Bakker, A. B. (2010). Job crafting: Towards a new model of individual job redesign. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 36(2), doi:10.4102/sajip.v36i2.841 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v36i2.841
Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291170 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291170
Viswesvaran, C. (1993). Modeling Job Performance: Is There a General Factor?.doi:10.21236/ada294282 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21236/ADA294282
Viswesvaran, C., & Ones, D. S. (1999). Meta- Analyses of Fakability Estimates: Implications for Personality Measurement. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59(2), 197-210.doi:10.1177/00131649921969802 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00131649921969802
Viswesvaran, C., & Ones, D. S. (2000). Perspectives on Models of Job Performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8(4), 216-226. doi:10.1111/1468-2389.00151 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2389.00151
Viswesvaran, C., Schmidt, F. L., & Ones, D. S. (2005). Is There a General Factor in Ratings of Job Performance? A Meta-Analytic Framework for Disentangling Substantive and Error Influences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(1), 108-131.doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.1.108 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.1.108
Vroom, V.H. (1964). Work and motivation. Wiley. ISBN: 0787900303
Warr, P. (2007). Work, Happiness, and Unhappiness. Psychology Press. doi:10.4324/9780203936856 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203936856
Williams, C. R., & Livingstone, L. P. (1994). Another Look at The Relationship Between Performance and Voluntary Turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 37(2), 269-298. doi:10.5465/256830 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/256830
Williams, K. D., & Karau, S. J. (1991). Social loafing and social compensation: The effects of expectations of co-worker performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(4), 570-581. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.61.4.570 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.4.570
Yang, D. M., & Shim, D. S. (2015). The Effects of Job Demand and Job Control on Work-Family Conflict, Burnout and Turnover Intention. Korean Corporation Management Review, 60, 87-108.UCI: G704-002085.2015.22.2.009
Yoo, Y. S., Kim, M. S., & Noh, S. Y. (2020). A latent profile analysis of job performance types based on task performance, contextual performance and counterproductive work behavior, Journal of the Korea Academia- Industrial, 21(4), 145-155.doi: 10.5762/KAIS.2020.21.4.145
Yoo, T. Y. (2007). The Relationship between HEXACO Personality Factors and a Variety of Performance in Work Organization. Korean Journal of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 20(3), 283-314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24230/ksiop.20.3.200708.283
Yoo, T. Y. (2008). The Interaction Effect of Personality Factors in Predicting Job Performance. Conference of the Korean Psychology, 1, 268-269. Retrieved from http://www.dbpia.co.kr/journal/articleDetail?nodeId= NODE06377581
Yoo, T. Y., Lee, K. B., & Ashton, M. C. (2004). Psychometric Properties of the Korean Version of the HEXACO Personality Inventory. Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 8(3), 61-75.UCI: G704-000424.2004.18.3.003