Mediating effect of coping behavior on the relationship between driving stress and traffic accident risk
Main Article Content
Abstract
The present study was conducted to determine the effects of driving stress on traffic accident risk. Specifically, this study verified the effects of driving stress on drivers' coping behaviors and the aptitude of mediating models through which coping behavior types affect traffic accident risk. As a result, driving stress directly increased traffic accident risk and indirectly affected them through(good and bad) coping behavior types. This indicates that driving stress directly and indirectly affect traffic accident risk by the medium of(good and bad) coping behavior types in multilateral ways.(Commercial and leisure-purposed) driving purposes showed significant differences in the relations between driving stress and traffic accident risk. Specifically, commercial drivers were affected by driving stress, compared to leisure-purposed drivers. As they were unable to defer or abandon driving even under driving stress, commercial drivers responded to the stress more sensitively and increased traffic accident risk by selecting inappropriate(bad) coping behaviors. The results show that the mere concentration on driving stress management cannot sufficiently lower the traffic accident risks caused by driving stress. This is because driving stress have indirect influences on traffic accident risk. Hence, it will be necessary to seek how to reduce driving stress and control coping behavior types in order to lower the traffic accidents risk by the stress.
Metrics
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
박선진, 이순철 (2009). 서두름 행동이 과제수행의 속도와 정확성에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 22(3), 469-485.
장승민 (2011). 일기법을 이용한 심리학 연구의 최근 동향과 전망. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 30(3), 677-706.
장재윤, 문혜진 (2014). 하루의 기분과 창의 과정 몰입 (CPE) 간의 관계. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 27(1), 165-189.
하원식, 탁진국 (2012). 코칭리더십이 맥락수행 및 창의적 행동에 미치는 영향: 조직 미덕과 학습목표지향성의 조절효과. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 25(1), 195-213.
Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10(1), 123-167.
Amabile, T. M. (1995). KEYS: Assessing the climate for creativity. Instrument published Center for Creative Leadership, Greensboro.
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Westview press.
Amabile, T. M. (1997). Motivating creativity in organizations: On doing what you love and loving what you do. California Management Review, 40(1), 39-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/41165921
Amabile, T. M. (1998). How to kill creativity. Harvard Business Review, 76, 77-87.
Amabile, T. M., Barsade, S. G., Mueller, J. S., & Staw, B. M. (2005). Affect and creativity at work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 367-403. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2005.50.3.367
Amabile, T. M., & Conti, R. (1999). Changes in the work environment for creativity during downsizing. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 630-640.
Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154-1184.
Amabile, T. M., & Gryskiewicz, N. D. (1989). The creative environment scales: Work environment inventory. Creativity Research Journal, 2(4), 231-252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10400418909534321
Amabile, T. M., Hadley, C. N., & Kramer, S. J. (2002). Creativity under the gun. Harvard business review, 80, 52-63.
Amabile, T., & Kramer, S. (2011). The progress principle: Using small wins to ignite joy, engagement, and creativity at work. Harvard Business Press.
Amabile, T. M., Schatzel, E. A., Moneta, G. B., & Kramer, S. J. (2004). Leader behaviors and the work environment for creativity: Perceived leader support. Leadership Quarterly, 15(1), 5-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.12.003
Andrews, F. M. (1967). Creative ability, the laboratory environment, and scientific performance. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 14, 76-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.1967.6448326
Andrews, F. M., & Farris, G. F. (1972). Time pressure and performance of scientists and engineers: A five-year panel study. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 8(2), 185-200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(72)90045-1
Baas, M., De Dreu, C. K., & Nijstad, B. A. (2008). A meta-analysis of 25 years of mood- creativity research: Hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus?. Psychological Bulletin, 134(6), 779-806. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012815
Baer, M., & Oldham, G. R. (2006). The curvilinear relation between experienced creative time pressure and creativity: moderating effects of openness to experience and support for creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 963-970. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.963
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands-resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309- 328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115
Barron, F. (1955). The disposition toward originality. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51(3), 478-485. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0048073
Beal, D. J., Trougakos, J. P., Weiss, H. M., & Green, S. G. (2006). Episodic processes in emotional labor: perceptions of affective delivery and regulation strategies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(5), 1053-1065. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.1053
Binnewies, C., & Wörnlein, S. C. (2011). What makes a creative day? A diary study on the interplay between affect, job stressors, and job control. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(4), 589-607. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.731
Bolger, N., DeLongis, A., Kessler, R. C., & Schilling, E. A. (1989). Effects of daily stress on negative mood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(5), 808-818 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.808
Boswell, W. R., Olson-Buchanan, J. B., & LePine, M. A. (2004). Relations between stress and work outcomes: The role of felt challenge, job control, and psychological strain. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64(1), 165-181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-8791(03)00049-6
Bouckenooghe, D., Raja, U., & Butt, A. N. (2013). Combined effects of positive and negative affectivity and job satisfaction on job performance and turnover intentions. The Journal of Psychology, 147(2), 105-123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2012.678411
Brayfield, A. H., & Rothe, H. F. (1951). An index of job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 35(5), 307-311. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0055617
Button, S. B., Mathieu, J. E., & Zajac, D. M. (1996). Goal orientation in organizational research: A conceptual and empirical foundation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67(1), 26-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1996.0063
Cavanaugh, M. A., Boswell, W. R., Roehling, M. V., & Boudreau, J. W. (2000). An empirical examination of self-reported work stress among US managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(1), 65-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.1.65
Dalal, R. S., Bhave, D. P., & Fiset, J. (2014). Within-person variability in job performance: A theoretical review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 40, 1396-436. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314532691
De Dreu, C. K. (2003). Time pressure and closing of the mind in negotiation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91(2), 280-295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-5978(03)00022-0
DeLongis, A, Hemphill, K. J., & Lehman, D. R. (1992). A structured diary methodology for the study of daily events. In G. Bryant (Ed.), Methodological issues in applied psychology (pp. 83-109). Plenum Press: NY.
Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41(10), 1040- 1048. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1040
Edland, A., & Svenson, O. (1993). Judgment and decision making under time pressure. In O. Svenson & A. J. Maule (Eds.), Time pressure and stress in human judgment and decision making (pp. 27-40). New York: Plenum Press.
Fishbein, M. (1973). The prediction of behaviors from attitudinal variables. In C. D. Mortensen & K. K. Sereno (Eds.), Advances in communication research (pp. 3-38). New York: Harper & Row.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Fleishman, E. A. (1953). The description of supervisory behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 37(1), 1-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0056314
Freedman, J. L., & Edwards, D. R. (1988). Time pressure, task performance, and enjoyment. In J. McGrath (Ed.), The social psychology of time: New perspectives (Vol. 91, pp. 113-133). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Frese, M., Teng, E., & Wijnen, C. J. (1999). Helping to improve suggestion systems: Predictors of making suggestions in companies. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 1139- 1155 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199912)20:7<1139::AID-JOB946>3.0.CO;2-I
Fuller, J. A., Stanton, J. M., Fisher, G. G., Spitzmüller, C., Russell, S. S., & Smith, P. C. (2003). A lengthy look at the daily grind: time series analysis of events, mood, stress, and satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(6), 1019-1033. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.6.1019
Gardner, D. G. (1990). Task complexity effects on non-task-related movements: A test of activation theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 45(2), 209-231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(90)90012-X
Gardner, D. G., & Cummings, L. L. (1988). Activation theory and job design: Review and reconceptualization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 81-122.
George, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2002). Understanding when bad moods foster creativity and good ones don’t: the role of context and clarity of feelings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 687-697. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.687
George, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2007). Dual tuning in a supportive context: Joint contributions of positive mood, negative mood, and supervisory behaviors to employee creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 605-622. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.25525934
Hargadon, A. B. (2002). Brokering knowledge: Linking learning and innovation. Research in Organizational Behavior, 24, 41-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(02)24003-4
Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort‐reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(3), 287-302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1348/096317900167038
Janssen, O. (2001). Fairness perceptions as a moderator in the curvilinear relationship between job demands, and job performance and job satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 1039-1050.
Judge, T. A., Thoresen, C. J., Bono, J. E., & Patton, G. K. (2001). The job satisfaction-job performance relationship: A qualitative and quantitative review. Psychological Bulletin, 127(3), 376-407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.3.376
Kurtzberg, T. R. (2005). Feeling creative, being creative: An empirical study of diversity and creativity in teams. Creativity Research Journal. 17(5), 51-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1701_5
Kurtzberg, T. R., & Mueller, J. S. (2005). The influence of daily conflict on perceptions of creativity: A longitudinal study. International Journal of Conflict Management, 16(4), 335-353.
Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer publishing company.
LePine, J. A., Podsakoff, N. P., & LePine, M. A. (2005). A meta-analytic test of the challenge stressor-hindrance stressor framework: An explanation for inconsistent relationships among stressors and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), 764-775. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.18803921
Locke, E. A. (1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 1297-1347). Chicago: Rand McNally.
Luthans, F., & Youssef, C. M. (2007). Emerging positive organizational behavior. Journal of Management, 33, 321-349. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307300814
Mackinnon, D. W. (1965). Personality and the realization of creative potential. American Psychologist, 20(4), 273-281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0022403
Nonaka, I. (1991). The knowledge-creating company. Harvard Business Review, 69(6), 96-104.
Ohly, S., & Fritz, C. (2010). Work characteristics, challenge appraisal, creativity, and proactive behavior: A multi‐level study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(4), 543-565. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.633
Oldham, G. R. (2003). Stimulating and supporting creativity in organizations. In S. Jackson, M. Hitt, & A. DeNisi (Eds.), Managing knowledge for sustained competitive advantage (pp. 243-273). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39(3), 607-634.
Pelled, L. H., & Xin, K. R. (1999). Down and out: An investigation of the relationship between mood and employee withdrawal behavior. Journal of Management, 25(6), 875-895. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639902500605
Podsakoff, N. P., LePine, J. A., & LePine, M. A. (2007). Differential challenge stressor-hindrance stressor relationships with job attitudes, turnover intentions, turnover, and withdrawal behavior: a meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(2), 438-454. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.438
Raudenbush, S. W., Bryk, A. S., Cheong, Y. F., Congdon, R. T., & Du Toit, M. (2011). HLM 7. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International Inc.
Reis, H. T., & Wheeler, L. (1991). Studying social interaction with the Rochester Interaction Record. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 269-318. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60332-9
Riketta, M. (2008). The causal relation between job attitudes and performance: a meta-analysis of panel studies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2), 472-481. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.472
Rodan, S., & Galunic, C. (2004). More than network structure: how knowledge heterogeneity influences managerial performance and innovativeness. Strategic Management Journal, 25(6), 541-562. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.398
Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi- sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(3), 293-315. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.248
Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580-607.
Semmer, N. K., Zapf, D., & Dunckel, H. (1995). Assessing stress at work: A framework and an instrument. In O. Svane, & C. Johansen (Eds.), Work and health: Scientific basis of progress in the working environment (pp. 105-113). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
Shalley, C. E., & Gilson, L. L. (2004). What leaders need to know: A review of social and contextual factors that can foster or hinder creativity. Leadership Quarterly, 15(1), 33-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.12.004
Shalley, C. E., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G. R. (2004). The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: where should we go from here?. Journal of Management, 30(6), 933-958. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.007
Tett, R. P., & Burnett, D. D. (2003). A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 500-517. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.500
Tierney, P., Farmer, S. M., & Graen, G. B. (1999). An examination of leadership and employee creativity: The relevance of traits and relationships. Personnel Psychology, 52, 591-620. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1999.tb00173.x
Tourigny, L., Baba, V. V., & Wang, X. (2010). Burnout and depression among nurses in Japan and China: The moderating effects of job satisfaction and absence. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21(15), 2741-2761. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2010.528656
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063-1070. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
Welbourne, J. L., Eggerth, D., Hartley, T. A., Andrew, M. E., & Sanchez, F. (2007). Coping strategies in the workplace: Relationships with attributional style and job satisfaction. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 70(2), 312-325. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2006.10.006
Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17(3), 601-617. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700305
Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 293-321. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1993.3997517
Zhou, J. (2003). When the presence of creative coworkers is related to creativity: role of supervisor close monitoring, developmental feedback, and creative personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 413-422. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.413
Zivnuska, S., Kiewitz, C., Hochwater, W. A., Perrewe, P. L., & Zellars, K. L. (2002). What is too much or too little? The curvilinear effects of job tension on turnover intent, value attainment, and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 1344-1360. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb01440.x