The development and effect of risk sensitivity improvement program for driver

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Feb 28, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24230/kjiop.v28i1.61-74

Main Article Content

Soonyeol Lee
Road Traffic Authority

Abstract

This study developed Risk Sensitivity Improvement program for Driver. A driver 62 people were developing a training program which can improve risk sensitivity factors was verified its effectiveness. By separating the driver from the control group and the experimental group populations was performed education program training a session, when compared to the risk sensitivity level before and 2 weeks after training showed significant improvements in risk sensitivity. The degree of risk sensitivity is improved risk sensitivity(Risk Sensitivity: RS) measure item were verified by. Risk sensitivity measure item was measured part of the risk perception and emotional anxiety. Control group and experimental group risk sensitivity level prior to performing risk sensitivity enhancement training program showed the same level. Repeated measures ANOVA and paired sample results to verify the effectiveness of using the t-test, the experimental group performed improving the risk sensitivity of a single session education program showed significant improvement in risk-sensitive than the control group. The risk-sensitive development programs through improved education could verify that it can be an effective training program that can make a difference in risk driving behavior of the driver.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
Lee, S. (2015). The development and effect of risk sensitivity improvement program for driver. Korean Journal of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 28(1), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.24230/kjiop.v28i1.61-74
Issue
Vol. 28 No. 1 (2015): Korean Journal of Industrial and Organizational Psychology
Section
Empirical Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

경찰청 (2014). 2013년 교통사망원인 통계.
도로교통공단 (2014). 교통안전교육 현황분석
어지영, 김도경, 김영록 (2012). 노인교통안전교육의 효과평가, 한국도로학회, 14, 1, 63-72.
오주석, 이순철 (2011). 운전행동 결정요인의 구성과 위험운전행동과의 관계, 한국심리학회지: 사회문제, 17(2), 175-197.
오주석, 황봉기, 이순철, 이종학, 김종민, 노관섭 (2011). 주관적 운전부하 수준과 PG기법 적용효과의 관계, 대한교통학회지, 29, 2, 37-45.
이순열 (2015, 심사중). 위험감수성(Risk Sensitivity: RS) 측정문항 개발과 그 적용의 타당성: 불안지각과 위험지각을 중심으로, 교통연구, 25, 1.
이순열, 이순철 (2010). 교통사고 위험지수에 대한 확인적 요인분석과 타당화 연구, 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 23(1), 75-87.
이순철 (2000). 교통심리학, 서울: 학지사.
이순철, 오주석, 박선진, 이순열, 최병희 (2012). 운전면허결격 감경 교육 프로그램 개발 연구. 도로교통공단.
이영애 (2005). 위험지각 연구의 최근 동향, 한국심리학회지: 실험, 17(3), 265-277.
이종학, 오주석 (2014). 운전자 교통안전교육 효과 연구, 한국도로학회, 16, 1, 40-46.
Earle, T. C. (2010). Trust in risk management, Risk Analysis, 30, 541-574.
Klebelsberg, D. (1982). Verkehrs-Psychologie, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 윤홍섭 (역) (1989), 교통심리학, 성원사.
Lerner, J. S., & Ketlner, D. (2000). Beyond valence: Toward a model of emotion-specific influences on judgement and choice. Cognition and Emotion, 14, 473-493.
Reason, J., Manstead, A., Stradling, S., Baxter, J., & Campbell, K. (1990). Error and violation on the roads: A real distinction? Ergonomics, 33, 1315-1332.
Rumar, K. (1985). The role of perceptual and cognitive filters in observed behavior. In Evans, L., Schwing, R. C., editors, Human Behaivor and Traffic Safety, New York, NY: Plenu Press, pp. 151-165.
Sabey, B. E., & Taylor, H. (1980). The known risks we run: The highway. TRRL Report SR 567 (Crowthorne: Transport and Road Research Laboratory).
Slovic, P. (2000). The perception of risk. London: Earthscan Publications.
Slovic, Pl, Finucane, M. L., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2004). Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Analysis, 24, 311-322.