A study of glass ceiling effect on impression management behaviors between Korean and U.S. women managers in financial institutions Focused on supervisor support and informal network

Main Article Content

Jungjin Kim

Abstract

This study examines contextual factors regarding glass ceiling effects women’s impression management behaviors arguing that impression management is not always caused by personal traits, but more importantly by context. This study explores to develop a cross-cultural examination to investigate glass ceiling effects over impression management behaviors of Korean and American female managers and organizational factors as moderating variables. Impression management is the process whereby individuals control their impressions in seeking to influence the perception of others about their own image (Rosenfeld, Giacalone, & Riordan, 1995). In the literature on impression management, gender difference in adopting impression management strategies are often considered (Singh, Kumra, & Vinnicombe, 2002; Thacker & Wayne, 1995). Although those studies contributed to further studies on impression management, this study focuses on women managers who try to control their impression. Leary & Kowalski(1990) argued that impression management may be a reaction to the discrepancy between desired social image and actual one. This implies that when people recognize a threat to their social identity, they are more likely to engage in impression management. Women employees may be inclined to engage in impression management behaviors for the following reason: they are structurally positioned as minorities even though recently women have advanced in terms of the number of women and the proportion of higher positions attained(Burt, 1997; Ibarra, 1992), and they may be more likely to experience the ‘glass ceiling’ within their organization (Dencker, 2008; Kirchmeyer, 2002; Thacker, 1995). In this sense, when women managers perceive glass ceilings within their organizations, it can affect the women’s impression management behaviors(Greenhaus, et al., 1990; Wayne, et al. 1999; Kirchmeyer, 2002). Second, this study examines organizational related factors which can moderate the above relationship. Supervisory supports and organizational informal networks within organization provide women employees with a sense of psychological satisfaction not only in terms of the practical support for careers but personal relationships and work in general (Forret & Dougherty, 2001). Thus, it would be a straightforward reasoning that women employees with supervisor supports & organizational informal network support would decrease the motivation of impression management behaviors. For data collection, this study surveyed women employees who have worked for at least 5 years in financial institutions. In Korea, questionnaires were administered to deputy managers and those at higher levels of 22 financial institutions and a total of 148 were used. In the United States, a random sample was selected because researchers were limited in accessing companies. Many financial institutions were visited, questionnaires were administered to managers with subordinates in state of California and New York, total 128 were used for research. The analysis of the study shows that the more perceived glass ceiling of women managers in organizations are likely to show supervisor-focused impression management behaviors. Second, supervisor supports have significant moderating impact on the supervisor-focused impression management. Third, organization informal networks have significant moderating impact on job-focused impression management in both Korea & U.S women managers.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
KimJ. (2012). A study of glass ceiling effect on impression management behaviors between Korean and U.S. women managers in financial institutions: Focused on supervisor support and informal network. Korean Journal of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 25(4), 833-859. Retrieved from https://journal.ksiop.or.kr/index.php/KJIOP/article/view/251
Section
Empirical Articles
Author Biography

Jungjin Kim, Seoul Women's University

Dept. of Business Administration

Funding data

References

김아영, 김세영 (2003). 명시적 부정문항과 암묵적 부정문항이 심리척도의 요인구조에 미치는 영향. 교육평가연구, 16, 39-52.

다카하시 노부오 (2007). 성과주의의 허상. 서울: 오즈컨설팅.

양현철, 정현선, 박동건 (2013). 직장 유연성이 신입사원급 직장인들의 이직의도와 혁신적 업무행동에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 26, 149-176.

장재윤 (2001). 연봉제 도입이 조직분위기, 조직구성원들의 내재적 동기 및 창의적인 행동에 미치는 효과. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 14(3), 25-55.

Aycan, Z. (2005). The interplay between cultural and institutional/structural contingencies in human resource management practices. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16, 1083-1119.

Benson, G. S. (2006). Employee development, commitment and intention to turnover: a test of ‘employability’ policies in action. Human Resource Management Journal, 16, 173-192.

Benson, J., & Hocevar, D. (1985). The impact of item phrasing on the validity of attitude scales for elementary school children. Journal of Educational Measurement, 22, 231-240.

Bento, R. F., & White, L. F. (1998). Participants' value and incentive plans. Human Resource Management, 37, 47-59.

Bond, M. H., Leung, K., & Wan, K. C. (1982). How does cultural collectivism operate? The impact of task and maintenance contributions on reward distribution. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 13, 186-200.

Brown, C., & Reich, M. (1997). Micro-macro linkages in high-performance employment systems. Organization Studies, 18, 765-781.

Campbell, D. J., Campbell, K. M., & Chia, H. B. (1998). Merit pay, performance appraisal, and individual motivation: An analysis and alternative. Human Resource Management, 37, 131.

Chang, E., & Hahn, J. (2006). Does pay-for- performance enhance perceived distributive justice for collectivistic employees?. Personnel Review, 35, 397-412.

Chen, C. C. (1995). New trends in rewards allocation preferences: A Sino-US comparison. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 408-428.

Child, J. (1996). Management in China during the age of reform (Vol. 23). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Chiu, R. K., Wai-Mei Luk, V., & Li-Ping Tang, T. (2002). Retaining and motivating employees: Compensation preferences in Hong Kong and China. Personnel Review, 31, 402-431.

Condly, S. J., Clark, R. E., & Stolovitch, H. D. (2003). The effects of incentives on workplace performance: A meta‐analytic review of research studies 1. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 16, 46-63.

Deckop, J. R., & Cirka, C. C. (2000). The risk and reward of a double-edged sword: Effects of a merit pay program on intrinsic motivation. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29, 400-418.

Deckop, J. R., Mangel, R., & Cirka, C. C. (1999). Research notes. Getting more than you pay for: Organizational citizenship behavior and pay-for-performance plans. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 420-428.

De Cuyper, N., & De Witte, H. (2011). The management paradox: Self-rated employability and organizational commitment and performance. Personnel Review, 40, 152-172.

Denison, D. R., & Mishra, A. K. (1995). Toward a theory of organizational culture and effectiveness. Organization Science, 6, 204-223.

Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice?. Journal of Social Issues, 31, 137-149.

Earley, P. C. (1994). Self or group? Cultural effects of training on self-efficacy and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 89-117.

Erez, M. (1997). A culture-based model of work motivation. In P. C. Earley, & M. Erez (Eds.), New perspectives on international industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 193-242). San Francisco: New Lexington Press.

Erez, M. (2000). Make management practice fit the national culture. In E. A. Locke (Ed.), Handbook of principles of organizational behavior (pp. 418-434). Oxford, England: Blackwell.

Erez, M. (2011). Cross-cultural and global issues in organizational psychology, In S. E. Zedeck (Ed.), APA Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, Vol.3: Maintaining, expanding, and contracting the organization (pp. 807-854). Washington, DC: APA.

Erez, M., & Earley, P. C. (1993). Culture, self-identity, and work. NY: Oxford University Press.

Farley, J. U., Hoenig, S., & Yang, J. Z. (2004). Key factors influencing HRM practices of overseas subsidiaries in China's transition economy. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 15, 688-704.

Fischer, R. (2004). Organizational reward allocation: A comparison of British and German organizations. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 28, 151-164.

Fischer, R., & Smith, P. B. (2003). Reward allocation and culture a meta-analysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34, 251-268.

Fischer, R., Smith, P. B., Richey, B., Ferreira, M. C., Assmar, E. M. L., Maes, J., & Stumpf, S. (2007). How do organizations allocate rewards? The predictive validity of national values, economic and organizational factors across six nations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38, 3-18.

Flannery, T. P., Hofrichter, D. A., & Platten, P. E. (2002). People, performance, and pay: Dynamic compensation for changing organizations. NY: Simon and Schuster.

Garbers, Y., & Konradt, U. (2014). The effect of financial incentives on performance: A quantitative review of individual and team‐based financial incentives. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87, 102-137.

Gehart, B., & Milkovich, G. T. (1992). Employee and compensation: Research and practice, In M. D. Dunette, & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Palo Alto. CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

Gluskinos, U. M. (1988). Cultural and political considerations in the introduction of Western technologies: The Mekorot project. Journal of Management Development, 6, 34-46.

Gong, Y., Shenkar, O., Luo, Y., & Nyaw, M. K. (2005). Human resources and international joint venture performance: A system perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 36, 505-518.

Halepete, J., Seshadri Iyer, K. V., & Park, S. C. (2008). Wal-Mart in India: a success or failure?. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 36, 701-713.

Hastings, D. F. (1999). Lincoln Electric's harsh lessons from international expansion. Harvard Business Review, 77, 162-180.

He, W., Chen, C. C., & Zhang, L. (2004). Rewards-allocation preferences of Chinese employees in the new millennium: The effects of ownership reform, collectivism, and goal priority. Organization Science, 15, 221-231.

Heine, S. J., & Lehman, D. R. (2004). Move the body, change the self: Acculturative effects on the self-concept. In M., Schaller, & C. S. Crandall (Eds.), The psychological foundations of culture (pp. 305-331). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Heneman, R. L., Greenberger, D. B., & Strasser, S. (1988). The relationship between pay-for-performance perceptions and pay satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 41, 745-759.

Heneman, R. L., & Werner, J. M. (2005). Merit pay: Linking pay to performance in a changing world. Greenwich, CT: IAP.

Hofstede, G. (1980). Motivation, leadership, and organization: Do American theories apply abroad? Organizational Dynamics, 9, 42-63.

Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (Vol. 3). London: McGraw-Hill.

Hofstede, G., Neuijen, B., Ohayv, D. D., & Sanders, G. (1990). Measuring organizational cultures: A qualitative and quantitative study across twenty cases. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 286-316.

House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (Eds.). (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Hui, C. H., Triandis, H. C., & Yee, C. (1991). Cultural differences in reward allocation: Is collectivism the explanation?. British Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 145-157.

Joe, S. (2004). Uchigawa Kara Mita Fujitsu: ‘Seika Shugi’ No Houkai. (윤정원 역, 후지쯔 성과주의 리포트, 도서출판 들녘, 2005)

Kabanoff, B. (1991). Equity, equality, power, and conflict. Academy of Management Review, 16, 416-441.

Kim, K. I., Park, H. J., & Suzuki, N. (1990). Reward allocations in the United States, Japan, and Korea: A comparison of individualistic and collectivistic cultures. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 188-198.

Kotter, J. P. (2008). Corporate culture and performance. NY: Simon and Schuster.

Lawler, E. E. (1971). Pay and organizational effectiveness: A psychological view. NY: McGraw- Hill.

Lawler, E. E. (1990). Strategic pay: Aligning organizational strategies and pay systems. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Lawler, E. E. (2000). Rewarding excellence: Pay strategies for the new economy. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Lawler, E. E., Mohrman, S. A., & Ledford, G. E., Jr.(1992). Employee involvement and total quality management: Practices and results in Fortune 1000 companies. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Lerner, M. J. (1974). The justice motive: “Equity” and "parity" among children. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 539-550.

Leung, K., & Bond, M. H. (1984). The impact of cultural collectivism on reward allocation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 793-804.

Leung, K., & Park, H. J. (1986). Effects of interactional goal on choice of allocation rule: A cross-national study. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, 111-120.

Leventhal, G. S. (1976). Fairness in social relationships. In J. Thibaut, J. Spence, & R. Carson (Eds.), Comtemporary topics in social psychology. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.

Levine, D. I. (1992). What do wage buy? Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 462-483.

Macdonald, S., & Maclntyre, P. (1997). The generic job satisfaction scale: Scale development and its correlates. Employee Assistance Quarterly, 13, 1-16.

Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.

Marsden, D., & Richardson, R. (1994). Performing for pay? The effects of ‘merit pay’ on motivation in a public service. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 32, 243-261.

Naughton, B. (1996). Growing out of the plan: Chinese economic reform, 1978-1993. NY: Cambridge University Press.

Newcomb, T. M. (1958). Attitude development as a function of reference groups: The Bennington study. In E. Maccoby, T. Newcomb, & E. Hartley (Eds.), Readings in social psychology (pp. 265-275). NY: Holt.

Newman, K. L., & Nollen, S. D. (1996). Culture and congruence: The fit between management practices and national culture. Journal of International Business Studies, 27, 753-779.

Nolan, P. (2001). China and the global economy. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.

Ouchi, W. G. (1980). Markets, bureaucracies, and clans. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25, 129-141.

Peterson, M. F., & Thomas, D. C. (2007). Organizational behavior in multinational organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28, 261-279.

Pillutla, M. M., Farh, J. L., Lee, C., & Lin, Z. (2007). An investigation of traditionality as a moderator of reward allocation. Group & Organization Management, 32, 233-253.

Pilotte, W. J., & Gable, R. K. (1990). The impact of positive and negative item stems on the validity of a computer anxiety scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 50, 603-610.

Ralston, D. A. (2008). The crossvergence perspective: Reflections and projections. Journal of International Business Studies, 39, 27-40.

Reis, H. T., & Judd, C. M. (2000). Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology. NY: Cambridge University Press.

Ross, L., & Nisbett, R. E. (2011). The person and the situation: Perspectives of social psychology. London: Pinter & Martin Publishers.

Sama, L. M., & Papamarcos, S. D. (2000). Hofstede's IC dimension as predictive of allocative behaviors: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Value-Based Management, 13, 173-188.

Schmitt, N., & Stults, D. M. (1985). Factors defined by negatively keyed items: The result of careless respondents? Applied Psychological Measurement, 9, 367-373.

Schneider, B. (1987). The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 40, 437-453.

Schuler, R. S., & Jackson, S. E. (1995). Understanding human resource management in the context of organizations and their environments. Annual Review of Psychology, 46, 237-264.

Schuler, R. S., & Rogovsky, N. (1998). Understanding compensation practice variations across firms: The impact of national culture. Journal of International Business Studies, 29, 159-177.

Singh, J., Verbeke, W., & Rhoads, G. K. (1996). Do organizational practices matter in role stress processes? A study of direct and moderating effects for marketing-oriented boundary spanners. Journal of Marketing, 60, 69-86.

Tett, R. P., & Meyer, J. P. (1993). Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover intention, and turnover: path analyses based on meta‐analytic findings. Personnel Psychology, 46, 259-293.

Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism & collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Triandis, H. C., Bontempo, R., Villareal, M. J., Asai, M., & Lucca, N. (1988). Individualism and collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives on self-ingroup relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 323.

Warner, M. (1996). Human resources in the People's Republic of China: The ‘three systems’ reforms. Human Resource Management Journal, 6, 32-43.

Warner, M. (2004). Human resource management in China revisited: Introduction. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 15, 617-634.

Weiner, N. (1980). Determinants and behavioral consequences of pay satisfaction: A comparison of two model. Personnel Psychology, 33, 741-757.

Williams, M. L., McDaniel, M. A., & Nguyen, N. T. (2006). A meta-analysis of the antecedents and consequences of pay level satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 392.

Witt, M. A. (2008). Crossvergence 10 years on: Impact and further potential. Journal of International Business Studies, 39, 47-52.

Wright, J. C., & Mischel, W. (1987). A conditional approach to dispositional constructs: the local predictability of social behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1159.

Zhou, J., & Martocchio, J. J. (2001). Chinese and American managers' compensation award decisions: A comparative policy-capturing study. Personnel Psychology, 54, 115-145.