When females are more risk aversive? Gender and Risk-taking behavior

Main Article Content

Dinara Shosaidova
Seungwoo Kwon
Jihye Park

Abstract

Although the issue of gender differences in risk taking behavior has been an interesting issue of industrial and organizational psychology fields, there is no univocal agreement on this topic. In this paper, we try to find supportive evidence that gender affects risk-taking behavior that is moderated by the frame. In addition, we extend the previous findings by adding variables such as ambition, responsibility, and internal locus of control. As expected, gender and frame interact to influence risk-taking behavior, such that positively framed men are prone to take more risks, whereas negatively framed women prefer risk-taking options. In addition, ambition and the level of internal locus of control are positively related to risk-taking behavior, while responsibility level is negatively related to risk-taking behavior. The implications and limitations of findings are discussed.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...
 

Article Details

Section
Empirical Articles
Author Biographies

Dinara Shosaidova, Korea University

Business School

Seungwoo Kwon, Korea University

Business School

Jihye Park, Korea University

Business School

References

Bliss, R., & Potter, M. (2002). Mutual fund managers: Does gender matter? Journal of Business and Economic Studies, 8, 1-15.
Bajtelsmit, V. L., & VanDerhei, J. A. (1997). ‘Risk aversion and retirement income adequacy’, in M. S. Gordon, O. S. Mitchel, & M. M. Twinney (Eds.), Positioning Pensions for the Twenty-first Century, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia: 45-66.
Bajtelsmit, V. L., Bernasek, A., & Jianakoplos, N. A. (1999). Gender differences in defined contribution pension decisions. Financial Services Review, 8, 1-10.
Bernasek, A., & Swift, S. (2001). Gender, risk, and retirement. Journal of Economic Issues, 35, 345-356.
Brockhaus, R. H. (1982). The psychology of the entrepreneur. in C. A. Kent, D. L. Sexton, & K. H. Vesper (Eds.), Encyclopedia of entrepreneurship Englewood Cliffs, Prentice Hall, NJ: pp. 39-71.
Burt, B. J. (1992). Gender and sustaining of political ambition: A study of Arizoma elected officials. Political Research Quarterly, 45(1), 11-25.
Byrnes, J. P., Miller, D. C., & Schafer, W. D. (1999). Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis, Psychological Bulletin, 125(3), 367-383.
Calicchia, J. P., & Pardine, P. (1984). Attributional style: Degree of expression, respondents’ sex, and nature of the attributional event. The Journal of Psychology, 177, 167-175.
Charness, G. (2000). Responsibility and effort in an experimental labor market. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 42, 375- 384.
Constantini, E. (1990). Political women and political ambition: Closing the gender gap. American Journal of Political Science, 34, 741- 770.
Cooper, A. C., Woo, C. Y., & Dunkelberg, W. C. (1988). Entrepreneurs’ perceived chances for success. Journal of Business Venturing, 3, 97-108.
Deaux, K., & Emswiller, T. (1974). Explanations of successful performance on sex-linked tasks: what is skill for the male and luck for the female. Journal of Personality of Social Psychology, 29(1), 80-85.
Edmunds, S. W. (1977). Unifying concepts of social responsibility. The Academy of Management Review, 2(1), 38-45.
Eysenck, H. J., & Wilson, G. D. (1991). The Eysenck Personlaity Profiler. Cymeon, Brisbane, Australia. (Specific Questionnaire available at: http://breakout2.org/down/KNOW%20 YOUR%20OWN%20MIND%20Personality%20Questionnaire.pdf)
Fingarette, H. (1966). Responsibility. Mind, New Series, pp. 58-74.
Fischoff, B. (1983). Predicting Frames. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 9, 103-116.
Freedman, S. A. (1992). Sex, gender, and locus of control in college students. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association. (100th, Washington D.C., August 14-18, 1992).
Halek, M. & Eisenhauer, J. G. (2001). Demography of risk aversion. The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 68(1), 1-24.
He, X., Inman, J., & Mittal, V. (2008). “Gender jeopardy in financial risk taking,” Journal of Marketing Research, 45, 414-424.
Hershley, J., & Schoemaker, P. (1980). Risk taking and problem context in the domain of losses: An expected utility ananlysis. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 47(1), 111-132.
Hinz, R. P., McCathy, D. D., & Turner, J. A. (1997). ‘Are women conservative investors? Gender differences in participant-directed pension investments’. in Mitchell, O. (Ed.) Positioning Pensions for the Year 2000, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia: pp.91-103
Iqbal, Z., O, S., & Baek, H. Y. (2006). Are female executives more risk-averse than male executives? Atlantic Economic Journal, 34, 63- 74.
Jinakoplos, N. A., & Bernasek, A. (1998). Are women more risk averse? Economic Inquiry, 36, 620-630.
Jinakoplos, N. A., & Bernasek, A. (1994). Decision making, risk and gender: Are managers different? British Journal of Management. 5(2), 123-138.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 43(2), 263-292.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 39(4), 341-350.
Levin, I., Snyder, M. A., & Chapman, D. P. (1988). The interaction of experiential and situational factors and gender in a simulated risky decision-making task. Journal of Psychology, 122(2), 173-181.
Mellers, B. A., Schwartz, A., & Weber, E. U. (1997). Do risk attitudes reflect in the eye of the beholder? Choice, Decision and Measurement: Essays in Honor of R. Duncan Luce, 59-73.
Newhouse, R. C. (1974). Reinforcement -responsibility differences in birth order, grade level and of sex children in grades four, five and six. Psychological Reports, 34, 699-705.
Olivares, J. A., Diaz, D., & Besser, M. (2008). Gender and portfolio choice: Are women more risk averse when selecting pension funds? Research Draft. 1-13. Journal of Economic Literature-Classification number: J16, G11, G23.
Peterson, S., & Lawson, R. (1989). Risky Business: Prospect theory and politics. Political Psychology, 10(2), 325-339.
Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 609, 80.
Rotter, J. B. (1975). Some problems and misconceptions related to the construct of internal versus external control of reinforcement. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43(1), 56-67.
Sapienza, P., Zingales, L., & Maestripieri, D. (2009). Gender differences in financial risk aversion and career choices are affected by testosterone. National Academy of Sciences, 106(36), 15268-15273.
Schubert, R., Brown, M., Gysler, M., & Brachinger, H. W. (1999). Financial decision making: Are women really more risk-averse? The American Economic Review, 89(2), 338- 385.
Simon, J., & Feather, N. (1973). Causal attributions for success and failure at university examinations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 64, 45-56.
Sunden, A. E. & Surette, B. J. (1998). Gender differences in the allocation of assets in retirement savings plans. The American Economic Review, 88(2), 207-211.
Turner, R. (1964). The social context of ambition: The study of high-school seniors on Los Angeles. San Francisco: Chandler Publications in Anthropology and Sociology.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 211, 453-458.
Wang, P. (1994). Brokers still treat men better than women. Money, 23(6), 108-110.
Weber, E. U., & Hsee, C. (1998). Cross-cultural differences in risk-perception, but cross cultural similarities in attitudes towards perceived risk. Management Science, 44(9), 1205-1217.
Weber, E. U., Hsee, C., & Sokolowska, J. (1998). What folklore tells us about risk and risk taking: A comparisons of American, German, and Chinese proverbs. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 75(2), 170-186.
Weber, E. U., & Milliman, R. (1997). Perceived risk attitudes: relating risk perception to risky choice. Management Science, 43, 122-143.