Development and validation of the Spiritual Management Index (SMI)
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Recently, organization is facing globalization, change, complexity, uncertainty. Also, new social-economic values such as conscious capitalism, sustainable management, stakeholder theory come into the spotlight. These changes in management include a shift from an economic focus to a balance of profits, quality of life, spirituality, and social responsibility concerns. And one of the greatest challenges facing organization is the need to develop new business models that accentuate ethical leadership, employee well-being, substantiality, and social responsibility without sacrificing profitability, revenue growth. This research suggest ‘spiritual management’ to deal with these changes. Spiritual management will enhances employee well-being, quality of life and provides employees a sense of purpose and meaning at work, a sense of interconnectedness and community. Nevertheless researches in this area are not enough and still inadequate level. In addition, there is no framework, well-defined concept and scientific diagnosis tool of spiritual management. Therefore we developed the Spiritual Management Iindex(SMI). To develop the scale we conducted researched on documentations and attended at spiritual management forum. Based on these research we developed 7 initial factors with 50items. Using these items we conducted survey, with the 261 people's survey results, we implemented the factor analysis. After validating we generated final 7 factor with 40 items. Also we conducted criterion-related validation. Spiritual management influence on happiness, organizational commitment, job engagement of employees.
Metrics
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
곽용선 (2010). 군 조직에서 상사의 변혁적 리더십이 부하의 직무스트레스와 조직몰입에 미치는 영향: 가치일치와 조직 공정성의 조절효과를 중심으로. 석사학위청구논문, 고려대학교.
국방부 (2010). 국방백서. 서울: 대한민국 국방부.
국방부 (2012). 국방백서. 서울: 대한민국 국방부.
김옥란, 김완일 (2014). 군 병사의 군 생활 적응 척도 개발 및 타당화. 상담학연구, 15(4), 1627-1646.
김원대, 김종엽 (2012, 9, 24). 병 4계급구조의 문제 진단과 개선방안. 주간국방논단, 1429(12-38).
민진 (2008). 군대조직의 특성에 관한 연구. 국방연구, 51(3), 61-92.
박승범, 박현숙 (2015). 서번트리더십이 군 조직유효성에 미치는 영향: 해병부대를 중심으로. 인적자원관리연구, 22(1), 297-318.
서미경, 박근우, 이규화 (2013). 군복무를 통한 병사의 성장과 탄력성, 대인관계의 변화. 정신보건과 사회사업, 41(4), 5-34.
서혜석, 이대식 (2008). 신세대병사의 진로발달이 군생활적응에 미치는 영향. 청소년상담연구, 16(1), 25-43.
연합뉴스 (2012, 7, 2). 軍 입대 동기끼리 내무반 쓴다.
오명자, 박희현, 이주희, 권재환 (2013). 병사의 군 생활 스트레스와 군 생활 적응의 관계에서 낙관성의 중재효과. 상담학연구, 14(2), 1051-1065.
우종필 (2012). 구조방정식모델 개념과 이해. 서울: 한나래출판사.
유연용 (2012). 병사들의 군생활 만족에 미치는 영향요인 연구. 한국군사회복지학, 5(2), 5-30.
육군본부 (2014). 육군규정. 대전: 국군인쇄창.
육군지 (2014, 4, 25). ‘전우’, 우리들의 행복한 만남.
이두희, 손승연 (2014). 군 조직에서 진성리더십이 과업성과에 미치는 영향: 팔로어 특성의 매개효과를 중심으로. 리더십연구, 5(4), 115-139.
임다영 (2011). 공유멘탈모델이 자율경영팀의 팀 효과성에 미치는 영향. 석사학위청구논문, 숙명여자대학교.
정미경, 고기숙 (2009). 군 병사들의 자아존중감과 우울이 자살의도에 미치는 영향: 우울의 매개효과 검증. 사회복지연구, 40(4), 453-483.
정신영, 이동귀 (2011). 자살 위험 병사들의 심리특성 연구. 상담학연구, 12(3), 897-914.
정원철, 박영주 (2011). 병사의 군 부적응 및 적응력 향상 관련 국내 연구동향의 개관. 청소년학연구, 18(1), 49-71.
정책브리핑 (2015, 2, 23). 동기생활관ㆍ평일 면회… 확 달라진 병영생활.
해럴드경제 (2014, 12, 12). 병영혁신위, 22개 軍 혁신과제 마련…병사계급 일원화는 빠질 듯.
해럴드경제 (2015, 9, 27). 도입 3년째, 아직도 시끄러운 軍 ‘동기생활관’의 명암.
Ahronson, A., & Cameron, J. E. (2007). The nature and consequences of group cohesion in a military sample. Military Psychology, 19(1), 9-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08995600701323277
Anderson, C., & Brown, C. E. (2010). The functions and dysfunctions of hierarchy. Research in Organizational Behavior, 30, 55-89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2010.08.002
Arbuckle, J. (2009). Amos 18 user's guide. Armonk, New York, USA: SPSS Incorporated.
Baron, J. N., & Pfeffer, J. (1994). The social psychology of organizations and inequality. Social Psychology Quarterly, 57(3), 190-209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2786876
Bass, B. M. (1990). Bass and Stogdill’s handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications. 3d ed. New York: Free Press.
Beal, D. J., Cohen, R. R., Burke, M. J., & McLendon, C. L. (2003). Cohesion and performance in groups: A meta-analytic clarification of construct relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(6), 989-1004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.6.989
Biggart, N. W., & Hamilton, G. G. (1984). The power of obedience. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(4), 540-549. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2392938
Blinder, A. S., & Morgan, J. (2007). Leadership in groups: A monetary policy experiment. International Journal of Central Banking, 4(4), 117-150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w13391
Bluedorn, A. C. (1979). Structure, environment, and satisfaction: Toward a causal model of turnover from military organizations. Journal of Political and Military Sociology, 7, 181-207.
Boer, P. C. (2001). Small Unit Cohesion: The Case of Fighter Squadron 3-Vl.G.IV. Armed Forces & Society, 28(1), 33-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X0102800103
Burke, C. S., Stagl, K. C., Klein, C., Goodwin, G. F., Salas, E., & Halpin, S. M. (2006). What type of leadership behaviors are functional in teams? A meta-analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(3), 288-307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.02.007
Carpenter, H. H. (1971). Formal organizational structural factors and perceived job satisfaction of classroom teachers. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16(4), 460-466. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2391765
Carron, A. V. (1982). Cohesiveness in sport groups: Interpretations and considerations. Journal of Sport Psychology, 4(2), 123-138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1123/jsp.4.2.123
Dion, K. L. (2000). Group cohesion: From "field of forces" to multidimensional construct. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 4(1), 7-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.4.1.7
Fernandez, S. (2008). Examining the effects of leadership behavior on employee perceptions of performance and job satisfaction. Public Performance & Management Review, 32(2), 175-205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2753/PMR1530-9576320201
Fleishman, E. A., & Peters, D. R. (1962). Interpersonal values, leadership attitudes, and managerial “success”. Personnel Psychology, 15(2), 127-143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1962.tb01855.x
Galinsky, A. D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Magee, J. C. (2003). From power to action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3), 453-466. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.453
Greer, L. L., & van Kleef, G. A. (2010). Equality versus differentiation: The effects of power dispersion on group interaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(6), 1032-1044. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020373
Griffith, J. (1988). Measurement of group cohesion in U.S. Army units. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 9(2), 149-171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp0902_6
Griffith, J. (2002). Multilevel analysis of cohesion's relation to stress, well-being, identification, disintegration, and perceived combat readiness. Military Psychology, 14(3), 217-239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327876MP1403_3
Griffith, J., & Vaitkus, M. (1999). Relating cohesion to stress, strain, disintegration, and performance: An organizing framework. Military Psychology, 11(1), 27-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327876mp1101_3
Gruenfeld, D. H., & Tiedens, L. Z. (2010). Organizational preferences and their consequences. Handbook of social psychology. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy002033
Halevy, N., Chou, E. Y., & Galinsky, A. D. (2011). A functional model of hierarchy: Why, how, and when vertical differentiation enhances group performance. Organizational Psychology, 1(1), 32-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2041386610380991
Halevy, N., Chou, E. Y., Galinsky, A. D., & Murnighan, J. K. (2012). When hierarchy wins: Evidence from the National Basketball Association. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(4), 398-406. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611424225
Halpin, A. W. (1957). Manual for the leader behavior description questionnaire. Bureau of Business Research, College of Commerce and Administration, The Ohio State University.
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Humphrey, S. E., Morgeson, F. P., & Mannor, M. J. (2009). Developing a theory of the strategic core of teams: A role composition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1), 48-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012997
Hurtz, G. M., & Donovan, J. J. (2000). Personality and job performance: the Big Five revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(6), 869-879. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.6.869
Ingraham, L. H., & Manning, F. J. (1981). Cohesion: Who needs it, what is it and how do we get it to them. Military Review, 61(6), 3-12.
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Scientific Software International.
Judge, T. A., & Bono, J. E. (2001). Relationship of core self-evaluations traits—self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability—with job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 80-92.. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.80
Judge, T. A., Piccolo, R. F., & Ilies, R. (2004). The forgotten ones? The validity of consideration and initiating structure in leadership research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(1), 36-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.1.36
Keller, R. T. (2006). Transformational leadership, initiating structure, and substitutes for leadership: A longitudinal study of research and development project team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1), 202-210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.1.202
Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110(2), 265-284. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.110.2.265
Kirke, C. (2010). Military cohesion, culture and social psychology. Defense & Security Analysis, 26(2), 143-159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14751798.2010.488856
Lee, S. Y., & Brand, J. L. (2005). Effects of control over office workspace on perceptions of the work environment and work outcomes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25, 323-333. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.08.001
Leonard, J. S. (1990). Executive pay and firm performance. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 43, 13-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001979399004300302
Levesque, L. L., Wilson, J. M., & Wholey, D. R. (2001). Cognitive divergence and shared mental models in software development project teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 135-144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.87
MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130-149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130
MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams, J. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(1), 99-128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3901_4
Magee, J. C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Social hierarchy: The self-reinforcing nature of power and status. The Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 351-398. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520802211628
Manning, F. J., & Fullerton, T. D. (1988). Health and well-being in highly cohesive units of the U.S. Army. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18(6), 503-519. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1988.tb00032.x
Mast, M. S. (2010). Interpersonal behaviour and social perception in a hierarchy: The interpersonal power and behaviour model. European Review of Social Psychology, 21(1), 1-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2010.486942
Moody, J., & White, D. R. (2003). Structural cohesion and embeddedness: A hierarchical concept of social groups. American Sociological Review, 68(1), 103-127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3088904
Motowidlo, S. J., & Borman, W. C. (1978). Relationships between military morale, motivation, satisfaction, and unit effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63(1), 47-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.63.1.47
Mullen, B., & Cooper, C. (1994). The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. Psychological Bulletin, 115(2), 210-227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.115.2.210
O’Connell, M. J., Cummings, L. L., & Huber, G. P. (1976). The effects of environmental information and decision unit structure on felt tension. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61(4), 493-500. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.61.4.493
Oliver, L. W., Harman, J., Hoover, E., Hayes, S. M., & Pandhi, N. A. (1999). A quantitative integration of the military cohesion literature. Military Psychology, 11(1), 57-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327876mp1101_4
Overbeck, J. R., Correll, J., & Park, B. (2005). Internal status sorting in groups: The problem of too many stars. Status and Groups Research on Managing Groups and Teams, 7, 171-202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1534-0856(05)07008-8
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879-903. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
Porter, L. W., & Lawler, E. E. (1964). The effects of “tall” versus “flat” organization structures on managerial job satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 17(2), 135-148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1964.tb00057.x
Porter, L. W., Steers, R. M., Mowday, R. T., & Boulian, P. V. (1974). Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover among psychiatric technicians. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59(5), 603-609. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0037335
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879-891. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
Ronan, W. W., & Prien, E. P. (1973). An analysis of organizational behavior and organizational performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 9, 78-99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(73)90038-X
Ronay, R., Greenaway, K., Anicich, E. M., & Galinsky, A. D. (2012). The path to glory is paved with hierarchy: When hierarchical differentiation increases group effectiveness. Psychological Science, 23(6), 669-677. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611433876
Salo, M., & Siebold, G. L. (2008). Variables impacting peer group cohesion in the Finnish conscript service. Journal of Political and Military Sociology, 36(1), 1-18.
Schacter, S., Ellertson, N., McBride, D., & Gregory, D. (1951). An experimental study of cohesiveness and productivity. Human Relations, 4, 229-238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675100400303
Shamir, B. (2000). Perceived combat readiness as collective efficacy: Individual-and group-level analysis. Military Psychology, 12(2), 105-119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327876MP1202_2
Shelley, H. P. (1958). Focused leadership and cohesiveness in small groups. Sociometry, 23(2), 209-216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2785684
Shields, D. L. L., Gardner, D. E., Bredemeire, B. J. L., & Bostro, A. (1997). The relationship between leadership behaviors and group cohesion in team sports. The Journal of Psychology, 131(2), 196-210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00223989709601964
Shrout, P. E. & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental Studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7(4), 422-445. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.7.4.422
Siebold, G. L. (1999). The evolution of the measurement of cohesion. Military Psychology, 11(1), 5-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327876mp1101_2
Siebold, G. L. (2007). The essence of military group cohesion. Armed Forces & Society, 33(2), 286-295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X06294173
Sondak, H., & Bazerman, M. H. (1991). Power balance and the rationality of outcomes in matching markets. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(1), 1-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90031-N
Steinhardt, M. A., Dolbier, C. L., Gottlieb, N. H., & McCalister, K. T. (2003). The relationship between hardiness, supervisor support, group cohesion, and job stress as a predictors of job satisfaction. American of Journal of Health Promotion, 17(6), 382-389. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4278/0890-1171-17.6.382
Tabernero, C., Chambel, M. J., Curral, L., & Arana, J. M. (2009). The role of task-oriented versus relationship-oriented leadership on normative contract and group performance. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 37(10), 1391-1404. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2009.37.10.1391
Taylor, A. B., Mackinnon, D. P., & Tein, J. Y. (2008). Tests of the three-path mediated effect. Organizational Research Methods, 11(2), 241-269. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428107300344
Tiedens, L. Z., & Fragale, A. R. (2003). Power moves: Complementarity in dominant and submissive nonverbal behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(3), 558-568. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.3.558
Tiedens, L. Z., Unzueta, M. M., & Young, M. J., (2007). An unconscious desire for hierarchy? The motivated perception of dominance complementarity in task partners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(3), 402-414. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.3.402
Van Vugt, M., Hogan, R., & Kaiser, R. B. (2008). Leadership, followship, and evolution: Some lessons from the past. American Psychologist, 63(3), 182-196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.63.3.182
Vegt, G., Emans, B. J., & Vliert, E. (2001). Patterns of interdependence in work teams: A two-level investigation of the relations with job and team satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 54, 51-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2001.tb00085.x
Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17(3), 601-617. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700305
Williams, J. M., & Hacker, C. M. (1982). Causal relationships among cohesion, satisfaction, and performance in women's intercollegiate field hockey teams. Journal of Sport Psychology, 4, 324-337. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1123/jsp.4.4.324